Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 925–932 | Cite as

An Embedding Based IR Model for Disaster Situations

  • Ayan Bandyopadhyay
  • Debasis Ganguly
  • Mandar Mitra
  • Sanjoy Kumar Saha
  • Gareth J.F. Jones
Article
First Online:
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

Twitter (http://twitter.com) is one of the most popular social networking platforms. Twitter users can easily broadcast disaster-specific information, which, if effectively mined, can assist in relief operations. However, the brevity and informal nature of tweets pose a challenge to Information Retrieval (IR) researchers. In this paper, we successfully use word embedding techniques to improve ranking for ad-hoc queries on microblog data. Our experiments with the ‘Social Media for Emergency Relief and Preparedness’ (SMERP) dataset provided at an ECIR 2017 workshop show that these techniques outperform conventional term-matching based IR models. In addition, we show that, for the SMERP task, our word embedding based method is more effective if the embeddings are generated from the disaster specific SMERP data, than when they are trained on the large social media collection provided for the TREC (http://trec.nist.gov/) 2011 Microblog track dataset.

Keywords

Microblog Twitter Information retrieval Word embedding 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, A., Ghosh, K., Majumder, P., Mitra, M. (2012). Query expansion for microblog retrieval. IJWS, 1(4), 368–380.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWS.2012.052535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corso, G.M.D., Gulli, A., Romani, F. (2005). Ranking a stream of news. In: WWW.Google Scholar
  3. Diaz, F.,Mitra, B., Craswell, N. (2016). Query expansion with locally-trained word embeddings. arXiv:1605.07891.
  4. Dong, A., Chang, Y., Zheng, Z., Mishne, G., Bai, J., Zhang, R., Buchner, K., Liao, C., Diaz, F. (2010). Towards recency ranking in web search. In: WSDM, pp. 11–20. ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1718487.1718490.
  5. Efron, M. (2010). Hashtag retrieval in a microblogging environment. SIGIR pp. 787–788. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1835449.1835616.
  6. Ghosh, S., & Ghosh, K. (2016). Overview of the FIRE 2016 microblog track: Information extraction from microblogs posted during disasters. In: Working notes of FIRE 2016 - Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation, Kolkata, India, December 7-10, 2016., pp. 56–61. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1737/T2-1.pdf.
  7. Ghosh, S., Ghosh, K., Chakraborty, T., Ganguly, D., Jones, G.J.F., Moens, M. (eds.) (2017). Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Exploitation of Social Media for Emergency Relief and Preparedness co-located with European Conference on Information Retrieval, SMERP@ECIR 2017, Aberdeen, UK, April 9, 2017, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1832. CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1832.
  8. Hiemstra, D. (2000). Using language models for information retrieval. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente.Google Scholar
  9. Imran, M., Castillo, C., Diaz, F., Vieweg, S. (2015). Processing social media messages in mass emergency: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(4), 67:1–67:38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ganesh, J., Gupta, M., Varma, V. (2016). Doc2sent2vec: A novel two-phase approach for learning document representation. In: SIGIR.Google Scholar
  11. Jelinek, F., & Mercer, R.L. (1980). Interpolated estimation of markov source parameters from sparse data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Practice.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, H.K., Kim, H., Cho, S. (2017). Bag-of-concepts: Comprehending document representation through clustering words in distributed representation. Neurocomputing, 266(Supplement C), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.046. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231217308962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kusner, M.J., Sun, Y., Kolkin, N.I., Weinberger, K.Q. (2015). From word embeddings to document distances. In: Proceedings of the 32Nd International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 37, ICML’15, pp. 957–966. JMLR.org. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3045118.3045221.
  14. Lau, J.H., & Baldwin, T. (2016). An empirical evaluation of doc2vec with practical insights into document embedding generation. arXiv:1607.05368.
  15. Le, Q., & Mikolov, T. (2014). Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning - Volume 32, ICML’14, pp. II–1188–II–1196. JMLR.org. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3044805.3045025.
  16. MacKay, D.J., & Peto, L.C.B. (1994). A hierarchical dirichlet language model. Natural Language Engineering, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
  17. Massoudi, K., Tsagkias, E., de Rijke, M., Weerkamp, W. (2011). Incorporating query expansion and quality indicators in searching microblog posts. ECIR, 2011, 362–367.Google Scholar
  18. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J. (2013a). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:1301.3781.
  19. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J. (2013b). In Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., & Weinberger, K.Q. (Eds.), Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, (pp. 3111–3119). New York: Curran Associates, Inc. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5021-distributed-representations-of-words-and-phrases-and-their-compositionality.pdf.
  20. Mikolov, T., Yih, W., Zweig, G. (2013). Linguistic Regularities in Continuous Space Word Representations. In: NAACL HLT 2013.Google Scholar
  21. Ounis, I., Macdonald, C., Lin, J., Soboroff, I. (2011). Overview of the trec-2011 microblog track. In: Proceeddings of the 20th Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2011), vol. 32.Google Scholar
  22. Ponte, J., & Croft, W. (1998). A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proc. ACM SIGIR.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M.F. (1997). Readings in information retrieval. chap. An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping, (pp. 313–316). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=275537.275705.Google Scholar
  24. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Jones, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1994). Okapi at TREC-3. In: Proceedings of the Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 1994). NIST.Google Scholar
  25. Varga, I., et al. (2013). Aid is out there: Looking for help from tweets during a large scale disaster. In: Proc. ACL.Google Scholar
  26. Xing, C., Wang, D., Zhang, X., Liu, C. (2014). Document classification with distributions of word vectors. In: Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific, pp. 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/APSIPA.2014.7041633.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayan Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  • Debasis Ganguly
    • 2
  • Mandar Mitra
    • 1
  • Sanjoy Kumar Saha
    • 3
  • Gareth J.F. Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Indian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.IBM ResearchDublinIreland
  3. 3.Jadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  4. 4.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options