Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 303–309 | Cite as

Comment on “A Conceptual Framework for Quality Healthcare Accessibility: a Scalable Approach for Big Data Technologies”

  • Paul L. Delamater
Article
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

ᅟFloating Catchment Area (FCA) metrics incorporate the supply of health care resources, potential population demand for those resources, and the distance separating people and supply locations to characterize the spatial accessibility of health care resources for populations. In this work, I challenge a number of assertions offered in a recently published FCA-based paper and provide a critique of the authors' proposed metric. Within my critique, I present a number of broad observations and recommendations regarding FCA metrics and their implementation in a Geographic Information System (GIS). In doing so, I aim to initiate a broader discussion of access to health care, spatial accessibility, and FCA metrics that transcends disciplinary boundaries.

Keywords

Geographic information systems Health care analytics Health care accessibility Gravity models 

References

  1. Bell, S., Wilson, K., Bissonnette, L., & Shah, T. (2013). Access to primary health care: does neighborhood of residence matter? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 85–105.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.685050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dai, D., & Wang, F. (2011). Geographic disparities in accessibility to food stores in southwest Mississippi. Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design, 38(4), 659–677.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b36149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delamater, P. L. (2013). Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health & Place, 24, 30–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delamater, P. L., Messina, J. P., Grady, S. C., WinklerPrins, V., & Shortridge, A. M. (2013). Do more hospital beds lead to higher hospitalization rates? A spatial examination of Roemer’s law. PLoS One, 8(2), e54900.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fransen, K., Neutens, T., De Maeyer, P., & Deruyter, G. (2015). A commuter-based two-step floating catchment area method for measuring spatial accessibility of daycare centers. Health & Place, 32, 65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guagliardo, M. (2004). Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. International Journal of Health Geographics, 3(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  7. Joseph, A. E., & Bantock, P. R. (1982). Measuring potential physical accessibility to general practitioners in rural areas: a method and case study. Social Science & Medicine, 16(1), 85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90428-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khan, A. A. (1992). An integrated approach to measuring potential spatial access to health care services. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 26(4), 275–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0121(92)90004-O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwan, M.-P. (1998). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Langford, M., Fry, R., & Higgs, G. (2012a). Measuring transit system accessibility using a modified two-step floating catchment technique. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26(2), 193–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.574140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langford, M., Higgs, G., & Fry, R. (2012b). Using floating catchment analysis (FCA) techniques to examine intra-urban variations in accessibility to public transport opportunities: the example of Cardiff, Wales. Journal of Transport Geography, 25, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, Z., Serban, N., & Swann, J. L. (2015). An optimization framework for measuring spatial access over healthcare networks. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 273.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0919-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin, B.-C., Chen, C.-W., Chen, C.-C., Kuo, C.-L., Fan, I., Ho, C.-K., Liu, I.-C., & Chan, T.-C. (2016). Spatial decision on allocating automated external defibrillators (AED) in communities by multi-criterion two-step floating catchment area (MC2SFCA). International Journal of Health Geographics, 15(1), 17.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-016-0046-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo, J. (2014). Integrating the huff model and floating catchment area methods to analyze spatial access to healthcare services. Transactions in GIS, 18(3), 436–448.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Luo, W., & Qi, Y. (2009). An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health & Place, 15(4), 1100–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luo, W., & Wang, F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design, 30(6), 865–884.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McGrail M.R., Humphreys J.S., (2014) Measuring spatial accessibility to primary health care services: Utilising dynamic catchment sizes. Applied Geography 54:182-188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGrail, M. (2012). Spatial accessibility of primary health care utilising the two step floating catchment area method: an assessment of recent improvements. International Journal of Health Geographics, 11(1), 50.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-11-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Plachkinova, M., Vo, A., Bhaskar, R., & Hilton, B. (2018). A conceptual framework for quality healthcare accessibility: a scalable approach for big data technologies. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(2).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9726-y.
  21. Radke, J., & Mu, L. (2000). Spatial decompositions, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs. Annals of GIS, 6(2), 105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10824000009480538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wan, N., Zhan, F. B., Zou, B., & Chow, E. (2011). A relative spatial access assessment approach for analyzing potential spatial access to colorectal cancer services in Texas. Applied Geography, 32, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations