Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 1033–1046 | Cite as

Routinisation of B2B E-commerce by small firms: A process perspective

  • Probir Kumar Banerjee
  • Louis C. Ma
Article

Abstract

Prior research on e-business based on the TOE framework and the factor based variance approach have yielded mixed results in that differences exist in terms of the identified technology, organisation and environmental factors and their influence at different steps of the routinisation trajectory. In this research we probe deeper into the routinisation phenomenon and investigate the process in a bid to understand ‘when’ and ‘why’ certain TOE factors become crucial determinants at different stages of the routinisation process. The context of our study is integration of B2B e-markets by four small firms. Our findings from interpretive case studies indicate that changes in organisational characteristic (such as IT infrastructure), environmental characteristics (such as e-business usage in the industry), and perceptions of e-business (risk and benefit) over time influenced movement along the routinisation trajectory. There is evidence that in high risk e-business, the ability to conduct trials with controlled risk is a crucial determinant of progression from initial to continued usage. Also, contrary to the independent effects of the organisation, environment and technology characteristics assumed in prior research, we found that it is the interaction effect of the three factors that determined initial attitude, initial usage and continued usage. Based on our findings we develop a process model of e-business routinisation and discuss the theoretical and practical implications.

Keywords

E-Business Routinisation Process theory Technology adoption B2B E-Markets TOE framework Risk Small firm Interpretivist case study 

References

  1. Al-Qirim, N. (2007). The adoption of eCommerce communications and applications technologies in small businesses in New Zealand. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications: Intelligent agents in eservices, 6(4), 462–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, C. P., & Sambamurthy, V. (1999). Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 304–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A strategic analysis of electronic marketplace. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, J., & Niehaves, B. (2007). Epistemological perspectives on IS research: a framework for analysing and systematizing epistemological assumptions. Information Systems Journal, 17(2), 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude towards IT usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229–254.Google Scholar
  8. Bonoma, T. V. (1985). Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems, and a process. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hui, K. L. (2001). Determinants of small business EDI adoption: an empirical investigation. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Child, J. (2001). Trust -the fundamental bond in global collaboration. Organizational Dynamics, 29(4), 274–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependant variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doolin, B. (1998). Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical in interpretive research on information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durkin, M., & McGowan, P. (2001). ‘Net effect’ — views from the periphery: exploring the role and importance of the Internet on marketing activity in entrepreneurial firms. Irish Marketing Review, 14(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, T. S., & Webster, R. L. (1999). Innovativeness of information systems managers toward telecommuting: structural equation model. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 39(3), 92–98.Google Scholar
  19. Evans, P. B., & Wurster, B. S. (1997). Strategy and the new economics of information. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 70–83.Google Scholar
  20. Fichman, R. G., & Kemerer, C. (1999). The illusory diffusion of innovation: an examination of assimilation gaps. Information Systems Research, 10(3), 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fillis, I., & Wagner, B. (2005). E-business development: an exploratory investigation of the small firm. International Small Business Journal, 23, 604–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1992). Do norms matter in marketing relationships? Journal of Marketing, 56, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hofstede, G. J., Oosterkamp, E. B., Fritz, M., & van Sprundel, G. J. (2009). A process perspective on trust building in B2B: Evidence from the agri-food sector. EFITA Conference, 289–300. Proceedings of the 7th EFITA Conference, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 6–8, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. Hung K. L., & Jamieson, R. (2003). TRiTAM: A Model for Integrating Trust and Risk Perceptions in Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce; 16th Bled eCommerce Conference on eTransformation, Bled, Slovenia, June 9–11, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Joshi, A. W., & Arnold, S. J. (1997). The impact of buyer dependence on buyer opportunism in buyer-supplier relationships: the moderating role of relational norms. Psychology and Marketing, 14(8), 823–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaufmann, R. J., & Dant, R. (1992). The dimensions of commercial exchange. Marketing Letters, 3, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, K., & Prabhakar, B. (2000). Initial trust, perceived risk, and the adoption of internet banking. Proceedings of the Twenty first International Conference on Information Systems. International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 537–543). Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, Special Issue on Intensive Research, 23(1), 67–93.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, M. K. O., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2004). Internet retailing adoption by Small-to-Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs): a multiple-case study. Information Systems Frontiers, 6(4), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Malone, T. W., Benjamin, R. I., & Yates, J. (1989). The logic of electronic markets. Harvard Business Review, 67(3), 166–168.Google Scholar
  33. Markides, C. C. (1998). Strategic innovation in established companies. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 31–42.Google Scholar
  34. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. Oh, K. Y., Cruickshank, D., & Anderson, A. R. (2009). The adoption of e-trade innovations by Korean small and medium sized firms. Technovation, 29, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raymond, L. (2001). Determinants of web site implementation in small business internet research. Electronic Network Applications and Policy, 11(5), 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sethi, V., & King, W. R. (1994). Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Science, 40(12), 1601–1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thong, J. Y. L. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small business. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 187–214.Google Scholar
  42. Thong, J. Y. L. (2001). Resource constraints and information systems implementation in Singaporean small businesses. Omega, 29(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  44. Walsham, G. (1995). The emergence of interpretivism in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 6(4), 376–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williamson, O. E. (1998). The institutions of governance. The American Economic Review, Nashville, 88(2), 75. 5 pgs.Google Scholar
  46. Wu, I. L., & Chuang, C. H. (2009). Analyzing contextual antecedents for the stage-based diffusion of electronic supply chain management. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(6), 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research-design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Yu, C. S., & Tao, Y. H. (2009). Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption. Technovation, 29, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business research methods (7th ed.). Orlando: Florida, Dryden Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Operations and MISUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Continuing and Professional Education, Department of Information SystemsCity University of HongKowloon TongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations