Skip to main content
Log in

A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them?

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The challenge of IT management is today considerable. In industry, the organizational role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) has been promoted as the owner of these challenges. In spite of a general acceptance of the problems associated with the responsibilities of the CIO, very little academic research has been conducted on the issues and constraints of this role. In order to address these shortcomings, this article presents the results of a survey in which Swedish CIOs have prioritized their most important concerns.

In academia, a response to the IT system management challenges has presented itself in the discipline of Enterprise Architecture. The article argues that the CIO role is the primary stakeholder of Enterprise Architecture, so his/her need for decision support should guide Enterprise Architecture research and framework development. Therefore, the article presents a brief review over how well two existing Enterprise Architecture frameworks address the surveyed concerns of the CIO.

Results from the survey indicate that the three highest prioritized concerns of CIOs are to decrease the cost related to the business organization, to improve the quality of the interplay between the IT organization and the business organization and to provide new computer-aided support to the business organization.

The comparison between the CIOs' prioritization and the foci of the frameworks shows some discrepancies. The largest disharmony lies in the lack of decision support for issues related to the IT organization. Furthermore, support for explicitly estimating and managing costs is lacking within the frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armour F, Kaisler S, Liu S. A big-picture look at enterprise architecture. IT Professional 1999;1(1):35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbacci M, Klein M, Longstaff T, Weinstock C. Quality Attributes. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-021, 1995.

  • Bass L, Clements P, Kazman R. Software Architecture in Practice, Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1998.

  • Boehm B. A Spiral Model for software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer 1988;21:61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolles G. This old infrastructure: Enterprise Architecture, http://www.cioinsight.com, published January 1 st, 2004.

  • Brackett M. Data Sharing. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy A. Information Systems Strategic Planning. Boca Raton, Florida. St Licie Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chief Information Officer Council. The Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework. CIO Council, 1999.

  • Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (formerly known as the Information Management Reform Act), Division E National Defense Authorization Act for FY, February 10, 1996.

  • CIO Role Survey. CIO Insight Magazine April 2002. (350 senior American executives) 2002.

  • Department of Commerce, Enterprise IT Architecture Advisory Group Home Page https://secure.cio.noaa.gov/hpcc/docita/, February 20, 2004.

  • DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. The DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0. Department of Defense, 9 February, 2004.

  • Ekstedt M, Johnson P, Lindstöm Å, et al. Consistent enterprise software system architecture for the CIO- A utility-cost based approach. In: Proceedings of the 37rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.

  • Enns H, Huff S. CIO Influence Behaviors: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators. In: Proceedings of SIGCPR ’99. 1999;194– 199.

  • Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office website, http://www.feapmo.gov, accessed April 1, 2004.

  • Focal Point, User manual, 2004.

  • Gottschalk P. Strategic management of IS/IT functions: The role of the CIO in norwegian organisations. International Journal of Information Management 1999;19:389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk P, Taylor N. Strategic Management of IS/IT Functions: The role of the CIO, In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on system Sciences, 2000.

  • Homer R, Nelson K. In their own Words: CIO visions about the future of In-House IT organizations. The Data Base for Advances in Information systems 2003;34(4).

  • Johnson P, Ekstedt M, Silva E, Plazaola L. Using enterprise architecture for CIO Decision-Making: On the importance of theory. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research, april, 2004.

  • Johnson P. Enterprise Software System Integration–An Architectural Perspective, Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2002.

  • Karlsson J. A systematic approach for prioritizing software requirements, Doctoral Dissertation No. 526 Linköpings University, 1998.

  • Linthicum D. Enterprise Application Integration. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Addison Wesley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern J, Ambler S, Stevens M, Linn J, Jo E, Sharan V. A Practical Guide to Enterprise Architecture. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriconi M, Xiaolei Q, Riemenschneider R, Li G, Secure software architectures. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 1997.

  • O’Rourke C, Fishman N, Selkow W. Enterprise Architecture, Using the Zachman Framework. Boston Massachusetts, Thomson Course Technology, 2003.

  • Perks C, Beveridge T. Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. New York, Springer Verlag, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruh W, Maginnis F, Brown W. Enterprise Application Integration. New York, Wiley, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Molina E, Evaluating IT Investments—A business process simulation approach, Licentiate Thesis, KTH, April 2003.

  • Sowa J, Zachman J. Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 1992;31(3).

  • Spewak S. Enterprise Architecture Planning Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open Group, The Open Group Architectural Framework Version 8. The Open Group, 2002.

  • Watts H, Managing the Software Process, Reading. Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1989.

  • http://www.focalpoint.se

  • http://www.opengroup.org, 20 February 2004.

  • Zachman J. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 1987;26:(3).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Åsa Lindström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindström, Å., Johnson, P., Johansson, E. et al. A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them?. Inf Syst Front 8, 81–90 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7972-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7972-0

Keywords

Navigation