Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 81–90 | Cite as

A survey on CIO concerns-do enterprise architecture frameworks support them?

  • Åsa Lindström
  • Pontus Johnson
  • Erik Johansson
  • Mathias Ekstedt
  • Mårten Simonsson


The challenge of IT management is today considerable. In industry, the organizational role of the Chief Information Officer (CIO) has been promoted as the owner of these challenges. In spite of a general acceptance of the problems associated with the responsibilities of the CIO, very little academic research has been conducted on the issues and constraints of this role. In order to address these shortcomings, this article presents the results of a survey in which Swedish CIOs have prioritized their most important concerns.

In academia, a response to the IT system management challenges has presented itself in the discipline of Enterprise Architecture. The article argues that the CIO role is the primary stakeholder of Enterprise Architecture, so his/her need for decision support should guide Enterprise Architecture research and framework development. Therefore, the article presents a brief review over how well two existing Enterprise Architecture frameworks address the surveyed concerns of the CIO.

Results from the survey indicate that the three highest prioritized concerns of CIOs are to decrease the cost related to the business organization, to improve the quality of the interplay between the IT organization and the business organization and to provide new computer-aided support to the business organization.

The comparison between the CIOs' prioritization and the foci of the frameworks shows some discrepancies. The largest disharmony lies in the lack of decision support for issues related to the IT organization. Furthermore, support for explicitly estimating and managing costs is lacking within the frameworks.


Enterprise architecture Chief information officer (CIO) Enterprise architecture frameworks Strategic information system management IT management 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armour F, Kaisler S, Liu S. A big-picture look at enterprise architecture. IT Professional 1999;1(1):35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbacci M, Klein M, Longstaff T, Weinstock C. Quality Attributes. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-021, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Bass L, Clements P, Kazman R. Software Architecture in Practice, Reading, Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Boehm B. A Spiral Model for software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer 1988;21:61–72.Google Scholar
  5. Bolles G. This old infrastructure: Enterprise Architecture,, published January 1 st, 2004.
  6. Brackett M. Data Sharing. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, 1994.Google Scholar
  7. Cassidy A. Information Systems Strategic Planning. Boca Raton, Florida. St Licie Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  8. Chief Information Officer Council. The Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework. CIO Council, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (formerly known as the Information Management Reform Act), Division E National Defense Authorization Act for FY, February 10, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. CIO Role Survey. CIO Insight Magazine April 2002. (350 senior American executives) 2002.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Commerce, Enterprise IT Architecture Advisory Group Home Page, February 20, 2004.
  12. DoD Architecture Framework Working Group. The DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0. Department of Defense, 9 February, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. Ekstedt M, Johnson P, Lindstöm Å, et al. Consistent enterprise software system architecture for the CIO- A utility-cost based approach. In: Proceedings of the 37rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Enns H, Huff S. CIO Influence Behaviors: Antecedents, consequences, and moderators. In: Proceedings of SIGCPR ’99. 1999;194– 199.Google Scholar
  15. Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office website,, accessed April 1, 2004.
  16. Focal Point, User manual, 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Gottschalk P. Strategic management of IS/IT functions: The role of the CIO in norwegian organisations. International Journal of Information Management 1999;19:389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gottschalk P, Taylor N. Strategic Management of IS/IT Functions: The role of the CIO, In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on system Sciences, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. Homer R, Nelson K. In their own Words: CIO visions about the future of In-House IT organizations. The Data Base for Advances in Information systems 2003;34(4).Google Scholar
  20. Johnson P, Ekstedt M, Silva E, Plazaola L. Using enterprise architecture for CIO Decision-Making: On the importance of theory. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research, april, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson P. Enterprise Software System Integration–An Architectural Perspective, Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), 2002.Google Scholar
  22. Karlsson J. A systematic approach for prioritizing software requirements, Doctoral Dissertation No. 526 Linköpings University, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Linthicum D. Enterprise Application Integration. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Addison Wesley, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. McGovern J, Ambler S, Stevens M, Linn J, Jo E, Sharan V. A Practical Guide to Enterprise Architecture. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Moriconi M, Xiaolei Q, Riemenschneider R, Li G, Secure software architectures. In: Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. O’Rourke C, Fishman N, Selkow W. Enterprise Architecture, Using the Zachman Framework. Boston Massachusetts, Thomson Course Technology, 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Perks C, Beveridge T. Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. New York, Springer Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
  28. Ruh W, Maginnis F, Brown W. Enterprise Application Integration. New York, Wiley, 2001.Google Scholar
  29. Silva Molina E, Evaluating IT Investments—A business process simulation approach, Licentiate Thesis, KTH, April 2003.Google Scholar
  30. Sowa J, Zachman J. Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 1992;31(3).Google Scholar
  31. Spewak S. Enterprise Architecture Planning Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
  32. The Open Group, The Open Group Architectural Framework Version 8. The Open Group, 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Watts H, Managing the Software Process, Reading. Massachusetts, Addison-Wesley, 1989.Google Scholar
  34., 20 February 2004.
  35. Zachman J. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal 1987;26:(3).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Åsa Lindström
    • 1
  • Pontus Johnson
    • 1
  • Erik Johansson
    • 1
  • Mathias Ekstedt
    • 1
  • Mårten Simonsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial Information and Control SystemsRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations