Advertisement

Information Systems Frontiers

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 71–83 | Cite as

Facilitator’s Roles in a Videoconference Learning Environment

  • Ulf Hedestig
  • Victor Kaptelinin
Article

Abstract

The paper reports a study of a videoconference-based environment in decentralized university education and factors contributing to the success of teaching and learning in the environment. The focus of the paper is on the role of a person having the formal responsibilities of a technician. An ethnographic study conducted over the course of a year revealed that the contribution of this person far exceeded the scope of formal responsibilities. The person, who was acting in the setting as a facilitator, was found to possess expertise, which was critically important for supporting interaction between remote participants at several levels, such as attention management, time management, acquisition of setting-specific skills, and coordination within a larger institutional context. The findings suggest that “supra-situational” activities can be important factors for the successful functioning and development of emerging learning environments.

Key Words

videoconferences facilitation distance education decentralized education coordination activity theory distributed cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borghoff U, Schlichter J. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Introduction to Distributed Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Bowers J, Button G, Sharrock W. Workflow from within and without: Technology for cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor, In: Marmolin H, Sundblad Y, Schhmidt K, eds. Proceedings of The Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Stockholm, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995:51–66.Google Scholar
  3. Bowker GC, Star SL, Turner W, Gasser L, eds. Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work. Beyond the Great Divide. London, England, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll J, ed. Designing Interactions: Psychology at the User Interface. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll J, Kellogg W, Rosson M. The task-artifact cycle. In: Carroll J, ed. Designing Interactions: Psychology at the User Interface. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press,1991.Google Scholar
  6. Cole M, Engeström Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salomon G, ed. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  7. Diamond L, Roberts S. Effective Videoconferencing. Techniques for Better Business Meetings. Menlo Park, CA, USA: Crisp Publications Inc., 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Dourish P, Bly S. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Bauersfeld P, Bennett J, Lynch G, eds. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’92). Monterey, CA, US: ACM Press, 1992:514–547.Google Scholar
  9. Engeström Y. Learning, Working, and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki, Finland: Sity Publisher, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. Esbjörnsson M. Förutsättningar för den distribuerade utbildningen. Den fysiska och virtuella miljöns påverkan på inlärningsprocessen. Department of Informatics, Report No 97.14, Umea University, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Halverson C. Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to do with theories? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1/2), Dordrecht: Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002;243–267.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison S, Dourish P. Re-place-ing Space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’96. Boston, MA, USA: ACM Press, 1996:67–76.Google Scholar
  13. Hedestig U, Kaptelinin V. Re-contextualization of teaching and learning in videoconference-based environments: An empirical study. In: Stahl G, ed., Proceedings CSCL 2002, Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Boulder: CO, USA. Hillsdale, NJ, USA. Lawrence Erlbaum, January 7–11, 2002;179–188.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Kaptelinin V. Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In: Nardi B, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, Chapter 3, 1996:45–68.Google Scholar
  16. Kaptelinin, V. Social thinking reaches out to software practice: The challenge of bridging activity systems. In: Dittrich Y, Floyd C, Klischewski R, eds. Social Thinking–-Software Practice. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, Chapter 3, 2002:45–68.Google Scholar
  17. Kaptelinin V, Cole M. Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing. In: Koschmann T, Hall R, Miyake N, eds. CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, Chapter 8, 2002:297–310.Google Scholar
  18. Keiper R. The VTC Technology Guide. A Manual of Video Teleconferencing Technology and Network Implementation. Keiper Associates Inc, Fairfax, VA, USA. 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Leontiev AN. Activity, Consciousness, Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
  20. Matusov E. Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1996;3(1):25–47.Google Scholar
  21. Monteiro E. Monsters: From systems to actor-networks. In: Braa K, Sørensen C, Dahlbom B, eds. Planet Internet. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 2000:239–249.Google Scholar
  22. Nardi B. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi B, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1996:69–102.Google Scholar
  23. Petrovsky VA. On the activity of the personality. Voprosy Psikhologii (Questions of Psychology), #3, 1975 (in Russian), 1975.Google Scholar
  24. Piaget J. Genetic Epistemology. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  25. Sachs P. Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 1995;38(9 Sept.):36–44.Google Scholar
  26. Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edition. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. Suchman L. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. Wulf V, Schinzel B. Lecture and tutorial via the Internet–-Experiences from a pilot project connecting five universities. In: Müldner T, ed. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunication (ED-MEDIA & ED-TeleCOM 98), Freiburg, Germany, Charlottesville, VA, USA: AACE Press, 1998:1562–1567.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations