Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 853–860 | Cite as

Early isolated optic neuropathy caused by cyclosporine

  • Karin Mimouni
  • Moshe Lusky
  • Michal Kramer
  • Michael Gdalevich
  • Dov Weinberger
  • Michael MimouniEmail author
Original Paper
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To examine, for the first time, whether cyclosporine intake has an early isolated effect on the optic nerve.

Materials and methods

This observational case series consisted of 192 eyes of 98 patients treated with cyclosporine. Patient age and duration and dosage of cyclosporine were recorded, and visual acuity, optic nerve function, visual fields, and visual evoked potential (VEP) were tested. Fundus examination was also performed. Patients with glaucoma, vascular retinopathies, and deep amblyopia were excluded.

Results

Mean patient age was 46 years, average duration of treatment was 6 years, and median dosage of cyclosporine was 200 mg daily. VEP was tested in 73 patients (142 eyes) and yielded a delayed P100 wave in 9 (12.32%) (14 eyes). Among these 9 patients, abnormal findings were also noted on the Ishihara colour test in 42.86% of the eyes, and on the visual field test in 64.3% of the eyes. Abnormal VEP showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) with older age (> 46 years) and a non-significant correlation with longer duration of treatment. Higher abnormal VEP potential was not correlated with higher cyclosporine dose, and there was no correlation between abnormal VEP and blood level of cyclosporine.

Conclusion

Optic neuropathy was significantly associated with older age in cyclosporine-treated patients. A correlation between optic neuropathy with longer duration of cyclosporine treatment was noted but was not statistically significant. We suggest that tests of optic nerve function, including VEP, be a part of the follow-up of patients receiving cyclosporine.

Keywords

Systemic Cyclosporine Optic neuropathy VEP 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to dedicate this paper to Dr. Lea Averbuch-Heller (1958–2000) who mentored us regarding the possible relationship between systemic cyclosporine treatment and optic neuropathy early in our careers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (place name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Colombo D, Ammirati E (2011) Cyclosporine in transplantation—a history of converging timelines. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 25:493–504Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kahan BD (2009) Forty years of publication of transplantation proceedings–the second decade: the cyclosporine revolution. Transplant Proc 41:1423–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kyriakides G, Miller J (2004) Use of cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 36:167S–172SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hesselink DA, Smak Gregoor PJ, Weimar W (2004) The use of cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 36:99S–106SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drachman BM, DeNofrio D, Acker MA, Galetta S, Loh E (1996) Cortical blindness secondary to cyclosporine after orthotopic heart transplantation: a case report and review of the literature. J Heart Lung Transplant 15:1158–1164Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghalie R, Fitzsimmons WE, Bennett D, Kaizer H (1990) Cortical blindness: a rare complication of cyclosporine therapy. Bone Marrow Transplant 6:147–149Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lopez-Jimenez J, Sanchez A, Fernandez CS, Gutierrez C, Herrera P, Odriozola J (1997) Cyclosporine-induced retinal toxic blindness. Bone Marrow Transplant 20:243–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernauer W, Gratwohl A, Keller A, Daicker B (1991) Microvasculopathy in the ocular fundus after bone marrow transplantation. Ann Intern Med 115:925–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Avery R, Jabs DA, Wingard JR, Vogelsang G, Saral R, Santos G (1991) Optic disc edema after bone marrow transplantation. Possible role of cyclosporine toxicity. Ophthalmology 98:1294–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Porges Y, Blumen S, Fireman Z, Sternberg A, Zamir D (1998) Cyclosporine-induced optic neuropathy, ophthalmoplegia, and nystagmus in a patient with Crohn disease. Am J Ophthalmol 126:607–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katz B (1997) Disk edema subsequent to renal transplantation. Surv Ophthalmol 41:315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blasco Morente G, Tercedor Sanchez J, Garrido Colmenero C, Martinez Garcia E, Molina-Carballo A (2015) Pseudotumor cerebri associated with cyclosporine use in severe atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 32:237–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akagi T, Manabe S, Ishigooka H (2010) A case of cyclosporine-induced optic neuropathy with a normal therapeutic level of cyclosporine. Jpn J Ophthalmol 54:102–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walter SH, Bertz H, Gerling J (2000) Bilateral optic neuropathy after bone marrow transplantation and cyclosporin A therapy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK, Honavar SG (2000) Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing. Ophthalmology 107:1303–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sharma AK, Goldberg I, Graham SL, Mohsin M (2000) Comparison of the Humphrey swedish interactive thresholding algorithm (SITA) and full threshold strategies. J Glaucoma 9:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1999) Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:143–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1998) Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:268–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chu NS (1987) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: latency changes with gender and age. Clin Electroencephalogr 18:159–162Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mitchell KW, Howe JW, Spencer SR (1987) Visual evoked potentials in the older population: age and gender effects. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Armstrong RA, Slaven A, Harding GF (1991) The influence of age on the pattern and flash visual evoked magnetic response (VEMR). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 11:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Celesia GG, Daly RF (1977) Effects of aging on visual evoked responses. Arch Neurol 34:403–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomoda H, Celesia GG, Brigell MG, Toleikis S (1991) The effects of age on steady-state pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 77:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allison T, Wood CC, Goff WR (1983) Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:619–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kazis A, Vlaikidis N, Pappa P, Papanastasiou J, Vlahveis G, Routsonis K (1983) Somatosensory and visual evoked potentials in human aging. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 23:49–59Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Celesia GG, Kaufman D, Cone S (1987) Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kupersmith MJ, Nelson JI, Seiple WH, Carr RE, Weiss PA (1983) The 20/20 eye in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 33:1015–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diem R, Tschirne A, Bahr M (2003) Decreased amplitudes in multiple sclerosis patients with normal visual acuity: a VEP study. J Clin Neurosci 10:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyRabin Medical CenterPetah TiqvaIsrael
  2. 2.Sackler Faculty of MedicineTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.The District Health OfficeBarzilai Medical CenterAshkelonIsrael
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologyRambam Health Care Campus Affiliated with the Technion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations