Semiautomatic procedure to assess changes in the eye accommodative system

  • Aikaterini I. Moulakaki
  • Daniel Monsálvez-Romín
  • Alberto Domínguez-Vicent
  • José J. Esteve-Taboada
  • Robert Montés-Micó
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate a new semiautomatic procedure to assess in vivo changes in the crystalline lens and ciliary muscle during accommodation.

Methods

A total of 14 subjects were divided into two groups, young (aged between 20 and 25 years) and adult (aged between 35 and 40 years), and measured with an anterior segment optical coherence tomography. A semiautomatic procedure was implemented to measure the central lens thickness (CLT), anterior lens radius (ALR) and the ciliary muscle area (CMA) for the unaccommodated eye and for a vergence of − 3.00 D.

Results

The CLT increase for each population group was smaller than 5%, and the dispersion of each group was similar between them. Contrariwise, the reduction in the ALR was about 30% for both groups, although the young one showed the largest variability. The CMA increase was smaller than 30% for both groups, and the dispersion was similar between them. For each metric, differences between both groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

The semiautomatic procedure seems to be useful for the in vivo analysis of the accommodative system. Additionally, the results obtained showed that changes in the CLT were much smaller compared to those obtained for the ALR or CMA.

Keywords

Crystalline lens Ciliary muscle Presbyopia Accommodation Optical coherence tomography Ageing 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Ministerio de Economía y Competitivad Research Project SAF2013-44510-R with ERDF funds (European Regional Development Fund) from European Union. Aikaterini I. Moulakaki is a “Marie Curie Early Stage Researcher” from the AGEYE Initial Training Network Program FP7-People-2013-608049 Project, Daniel Monsálvez-Romín is a “Formación de Profesorado Universitario” grantee (FPU13/05332, Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte), and Alberto Domínguez-Vicent is an “Atracció de Talent” grantee (UV-INV-PREDOC13-110412, University of Valencia, Spain).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Von Helmholtz H (1855) Über die Akkommodation des Auges. Arch Ophthalmol 1:1–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strenk S, Strenk L, Koretz J (2005) The mechanism of presbyopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 24:379–393CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Strenk S, Semmlow J, Strenk L, Munoz P, Gronlund-Jacob J, DeMarco J (1999) Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:1162–1169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tamm S, Tamm E, Rohen J (1992) Age-related changes of the human ciliary muscle. A quantitative morphometric study. Mech Ageing Dev 62:209–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luo B, Brown G, Luo S, Brown M (2008) The quality of life associated with presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 145:618–622CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leung C, Chan W, Ko C, Chui S, Woo J, Tsang M, Tse R (2005) Visualization of anterior chamber angle dynamics using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 112:980–984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dada T, Sihota R, Gadia R, Aggarwal A, Mandal S, Gupta V (2007) Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:837–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strenk S, Strenk L, Guo S (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the anteroposterior position and thickness of the aging, accommodating, phakic, and pseudophakic ciliary muscle. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:235–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ursea R, Silverman R (2010) Anterior-segment imaging for assessment of glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 5:59–74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sheppard A, Davies L (2010) In vivo analysis of ciliary muscle morphologic changes with accommodation and axial ametropia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:6882–6889CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sheppard A, Davies L (2011) The effect of ageing on in vivo human ciliary muscle morphology and contractility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:1809–1816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shao Y, Tao A, Jiang H, Shen M, Zhong J, Lu F, Wang J (2013) Simultaneous real-time imaging of the ocular anterior segment including the ciliary muscle during accommodation. Biomed Opt Express 4:466–480CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruggeri M, de Freitas C, Williams S, Hernandez V, Cabot F, Yesilirmark N, Alawa K, Chang Y, Yoo S, Gregori G, Parel J, Manns F (2016) Quantification of the ciliary muscle and crystalline lens interaction during accommodation with synchronous OCT imaging. Biomed Opt Express 17:1351–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richdale K, Sinnott L, Bullimore M, Wassenaar P, Schmalbrock P, Kao C, Patz S, Mutti D, Glasser A, Zadnik K (2013) Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:1095–1105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benjamin WJ (2006) Borish’s clinical refraction, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, p 1003Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Montés-Micó R, Alió J, Muñoz G, Charman W (2004) Temporal changes in optical quality of air-tear film interface at anterior cornea after blink. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1752–1757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown N (1974) The change in lens curvature with age. Exp Eye Res 19:175–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Du C, Shen M, Li M, Zhu D, Wang M, Wang J (2012) Anterior segment biometry during accommodation imaged with ultralong scan depth optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 119:2479–2485CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richdale K, Bullimore M, Sinnott L, Zadnik K (2016) The effect of age, accommodation, and refractive error on the adult human eye. Optom Vis Sci 93:3–11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neri A, Ruggeri M, Protti A, Leaci R, Gandolfi S, Macaluso C (2015) Dynamic imaging of accommodation by swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:501–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun Y, Fan S, Zheng H, Dai C, Ren Q, Zhou C (2014) Noninvasive imaging and measurement of accommodation using dual-channel SD-OCT. Curr Eye Res 39:611–619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramasubramanian V, Glasser A (2015) Objective measurement of accommodative biometric changes using ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:511–526CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dubbelman M, van der Heijde G, Weeber H (2005) Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vis Res 45:117–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shao Y, Tao A, Jiang H, Mao X, Zhong J, Shen M, Lu F, Xu Z, Karp C, Wang J (2015) Age-related changes in the anterior segment biometry during accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:3522–3530CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tabernero J, Chirre E, Hervella L, Prieto P, Artal P (2016) The accommodative ciliary muscle function is preserved in older humans. Sci Rep 6:25551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barraquer R, Michael R, Abreu R, Lamarca J, Tresserra F (2006) Human lens capsule thickness as a function of age and location along the sagittal lens perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:2053–2060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Glasser A, Campbell M (1998) Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vis Res 38:209–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glasser A, Campbell M (1999) Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia. Vis Res 39:1991–2015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koretz J, Neider M, Kaufman P, Bertasso A, DeRousseau C, Bito L (1987) Slitlamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye I: survey of the anterior segment. Exp Eye Res 44:307–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Koretz J, Bertasso A, Neider M, True-Gabelt B, Kaufman P (1987) Slit-lamp studies of the rhesus monkey eye: II. Changes in crystalline lens shape, thickness and position during accommodation and aging. Exp Eye Res 45:317–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ostrin L, Glasser A (2007) Effects of pharmacologically manipulated amplitude and starting point on Edinger-Westphal-stimulated accommodative dynamics in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:313–320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glasser A, Wendt M, Ostrin L (2006) Accommodative changes in lens diameter in rhesus monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:278–286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Glasser A, Kaufman P (1999) The mechanism of accommodation in primates. Ophthalmology 106:863–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wasilewski R, McDonald J, Heatley G, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman P, Croft M (2008) Surgical intervention and accommodative responses II: forward ciliary body accommodative movement is facilitated by zonular attachments to the lens capsule. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:5495–5502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kaufman P, Bito L, DeRousseau C (1982) The development of presbyopia in primates. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 102:323–326PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pardue M, Sivak J (2000) Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci 77:204–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Croft M, McDonald J, Katz A, Lin T, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman P (2013) Extralenticular and lenticular aspects of accommodation and presbyopia in human versus monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:5035–5048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Croft M, Nork T, McDonald J, Katz A, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Kaufman P (2013) Accommodative movements of the vitreous membrane, choroid, and sclera in young and presbyopic human and nonhuman primate eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:5049–5058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lewis H, Kao C, Sinnott L, Bailey M (2012) Changes in ciliary muscle thickness during accommodation in children. Optom Vis Sci 89:727–737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lossing L, Sinnott L, Kao C, Richdale K, Bailey M (2012) Measuring changes in ciliary muscle thickness with accommodation in young adults. Optom Vis Sci 89:719–726CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Richdale K, Bailey M, Sinnott L, Kao C, Zadnik K, Bullimore M (2012) The effect of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle and accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 89:1507–1511CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kao C, Richdale K, Sinnott L, Grillot L, Bailey M (2011) Semiautomatic extraction algorithm for images of the ciliary muscle. Optom Vis Sci 88:275–289CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Optometry Research Group (GIO), Optics, Optometry and Vision Sciences DepartmentUniversity of ValenciaBurjassotSpain

Personalised recommendations