Evaluation of corneal topographic changes and surgically induced astigmatism after transconjunctival 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery

  • Kemal Tekin
  • Kenan Sonmez
  • Merve Inanc
  • Kubra Ozdemir
  • Yasin Sakir Goker
  • Pelin Yilmazbas
Original Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the corneal topographic changes and postvitrectomy astigmatism after 27-gauge (g) microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) by using Pentacam HR-Scheimpflug imaging system.

Methods

This prospective descriptive study included 30 eyes of 30 patients who underwent 27-g MIVS. All eyes underwent a Pentacam HR examination preoperatively and on the first week, first month and third month postoperatively. The power of the corneal astigmatism, mean keratometry (K m), K 1 and K 2 values and corneal asphericity (Q value) values for the both front and back surfaces of the cornea, index of surface variance (ISV), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), index of height asymmetry (IHA), index of height decentration (IHD) and higher-order aberrations including coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, higher-order root-mean-square and total RMS were recorded. Additionally, the mean induced astigmatism was estimated by vector analysis.

Results

No statistically significant changes were observed in the mean power of corneal astigmatism, mean keratometry, K 1 and K 2 values, corneal asphericity values, ISV, IVA, IHA, IHD and higher-order aberrations on the first week, first month and third month after the operation. The mean surgically induced astigmatism was calculated as 0.23 ± 0.11 D on the first week, 0.19 ± 0.10 D on the first month and 0.19 ± 0.08 D on the third month postoperatively.

Conclusion

Minor corneal surface and induced astigmatic changes are expected to result in rapid visual rehabilitation after pars plana vitrectomy with the 27-g MIVS system.

Keywords

Corneal topography Induced astigmatism Microincision vitrectomy surgery Pars plana vitrectomy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Lakhanpal RR, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Jr LJ, Chong LP, Chang TS, Javaheri M, Fujii GY, Barnes AC, Alexandrou TJ (2005) Outcomes of 140 consecutive cases of 25-gauge transconjunctival surgery for posterior segment disease. Ophthalmology 112:817–824CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fabian ID, Moisseiev J (2011) Sutureless vitrectomy: evolution and current practices. Br J Ophthalmol 95:318–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spirn MJ (2009) Comparison of 25, 23 and 20-gauge vitrectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:195–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson JT (2011) Advantages and limitations of small gauge vitrectomy. Surv Ophthalmol 56:162–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oshima Y, Wakabayashi T, Sato T, Ohji M, Tano Y (2010) A 27-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless microincision vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology 117:93–102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Toygar O, Mi CW, Miller DM, Riemann CD (2016) Outcomes of transconjunctival sutureless 27-gauge vitrectomy with silicone oil infusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:2111–2118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romano MR, Scotti F, Vinciguerra P (2015) 27-Gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: is it feasible? Ann Acad Med Singap 44:185–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khan MA, Rahimy E, Gupta OP, Hsu J (2016) Combined 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixation of an Akreos AO60 intraocular lens using Gore-Tex suture. Retina 36:1602–1604CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan MA, Shahlaee A, Toussaint B, Hsu J, Sivalingam A, Dugel PU, Lakhanpal RR, Riemann CD, Berrocal MH, Regillo CD, Ho AC (2016) Outcomes of 27 gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery for posterior segment disease. Am J Ophthalmol 161:36–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sternberg P Jr, Hatchell DL, Foulks GN, Landers MB 3rd (1985) The effect of silicone oil on the cornea. Arch Ophthalmol 103:90–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaffe NS (1981) Postoperative corneal astigmatism. In: Jaffe NS (ed) Cataract surgery and its complications. Mosby, St Louis, pp 92–110Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jampel HD, Thompson JT, Nunez M, Michels RG (1987) Corneal astigmatic changes after pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 7:223–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wirbalauer C, Hoerauf H, Roider J, Laqua H (1998) Corneal shape changes after pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:822–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuen CY, Cheung BT, Tsang CW, Lam RF, Baig NB, Lam DS (2009) Surgically induced astigmatism in phacoemulsification, pars plana vitrectomy, and combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy: a comparative study. Eye (Lond) 23:576–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park DH, Shin JP, Kim SY (2009) Surgically induced astigmatism in combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy; 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge standart vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247:1331–1337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Domniz YY, Cahana M, Avni I (2001) Corneal surface changes after pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:868–872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weinberg D, Lichter H, Loya N, Axer-Siegel R, Muzmacher L, Gabbay U, Yassur Y (1999) Corneal topographic changes after retinal and vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 106:1521–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azar-Arevalo O, Arevalo JF (2001) Corneal topography changes after vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 32:168–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Slusher MM, Ford JG, Busbee B (2002) Clinically significant corneal astigmatism and pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 33:5–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim YK, Hyon JY, Woo SJ, Park KH, Yu YS, Chung H (2010) Surgically induced astigmatism after 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Eye (Lond) 24:799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Nohutcu AF (2005) Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival (25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 140:939–941CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yanyali A, Horozoglu F, Macin A, Bozkurt KT, Aykut V, Acar BT, Nohutcu AF (2011) Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival 23-gauge sutureless vitrectomy. Int Ophthalmol 31:277–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Citirik M, Batman C, Bicer T, Zilelioglu O (2009) Keratometric alterations following the 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy versus the conventional pars plana vitrectomy. Clin Exp Optom 92:416–420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Paula AC, Nassaralla Júnior JJ, Rodrigues FW, da Silva RE, Correa e Silva RS, Barbosa Junior DR (2012) Alterations in the corneal topography after pars plana vitrectomy with the standard system of 20-gauge and the 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Semin Ophthalmol 27:11–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Galway G, Drury B, Cronin BG, Bourke RD (2010) A comparison of induced astigmatism in 20- vs 25-gauge vitrectomy procedures. Eye (Lond) 24:315–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okamoto F, Okamoto C, Sakata N, Hiratsuka K, Yamane N, Hiraoka T, Kaji Y, Oshika T (2007) Changes in corneal topography after 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus after 20-gauge standard vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 114:2138–2141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Avitabile T, Castiglione F, Bonfiglio V, Castiglione F (2010) Transconjunctival sutureless 25-gauge versus 20-gauge standard vitrectomy: correlation between corneal topography and ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements of sclerotomy sites. Cornea 29:19–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grandinette AA, Kniggendorf V, Moreira LB, Moreira Junior CA, Moreira AT (2015) A comparison study of corneal topographic changes following 20-, 23-, and 25-G pars plana vitrectomy. Arq Bras Oftalmol 78:283–285Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kemal Tekin
    • 1
  • Kenan Sonmez
    • 1
  • Merve Inanc
    • 1
  • Kubra Ozdemir
    • 1
  • Yasin Sakir Goker
    • 1
  • Pelin Yilmazbas
    • 1
  1. 1.Ankara Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations