Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 57–60 | Cite as

Pyogenic granuloma of the lacrimal sac

  • Bülent Yazıcı
  • Ayşe Tör Ayvaz
  • Sibel Aker
Case Report

Abstract

In this report, we describe three adult patients diagnosed with lacrimal sac pyogenic granuloma. The presenting symptoms were acute dacryocystitis, lacrimal mass, and bloody tears. The nasolacrimal drainage pathway was obstructed in all cases. Radiologic evaluation performed in one patient revealed the presence of a well-defined mass in the sac with homogenous contrast uptake. Histopathologic examination revealed capillary proliferation and inflammatory cells in a fibromyxoid stroma. The patients were followed up for 11–23 months after external dacryocystorhinostomy without recurrence of the tumor or nasolacrimal obstruction. Pyogenic granuloma may develop from the lacrimal sac mucosa and may cause bloody epiphora. Such a tumor is visualized as a hemorrhagic mass lesion, and it may not have a negative effect on the outcome of DCR.

Keywords

Lacrimal sac Pyogenic granuloma Dacryocystorhinostomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Mills SE, Cooper PH, Fechner RE (1980) Lobular capillary hemangioma: the underlying lesion of pyogenic granuloma—a study of 73 cases from the oral and nasal mucous membranes. Am J Surg Pathol 4:470–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asiyo MN, Stefani FH (1992) Pyogenic granulomas of the lacrimal sac. Eye 6:97–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haritoglou C, Hoops JP (2002) Pyogenes Granulom des Tränensackes bei chronischer Dakryozystitis. [Pyogenic granuloma of the lacrimal sac.]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:373–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson NG, Wojno TH, Grossniklaus HE (2003) Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 19:173–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee-Wing MW, Ashenhurst ME (2001) Clinicopathologic analysis of 166 patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 108:2038–2040CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tucker N, Chow D, Stockl F, Codere F, Burnier M (1997) Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinicopathologic review of 150 patients. Ophthalmology 104:1882–1886PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marthin JK, Lindegaard J, Prause JU, Heegaard S (2005) Lesions of the lacrimal drainage system: a clinicopathological study of 643 biopsy specimens of the lacrimal drainage system in Denmark 1910–1999. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:94–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferry AP (1989) Pyogenic granuloma of the eye and ocular adnexa: a study of 100 cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 87:327–347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heathcote JG, Allen LH, Willis NR (1987) Plasma cell granuloma of the lacrimal sac. Can J Ophthalmol 22:387–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ciftci F, Ersanli D, Civelek L et al (2005) Histopathologic changes in the lacrimal sac of dacryocystorhinostomy patients with and without silicone intubation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 21:59–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Valenzuela AA, McNab AA, Selva D et al (2006) Clinical features and management of tumors affecting the lacrimal drainage apparatus. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 22:96–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bülent Yazıcı
    • 1
  • Ayşe Tör Ayvaz
    • 1
  • Sibel Aker
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUludağ University Faculty of MedicineBursaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of PathologyUludağ University Faculty of MedicineBursaTurkey

Personalised recommendations