A Relational Approach to Evil Action: Vulnerability and its Exploitation

Article

References

  1. Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, David J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. 1951/1993. The Authoritarian personality. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Bagnoli, Carla. 2017. Vulnerability and the incompleteness of practical reason. In Vulnerability, autonomy, and applied ethics, ed. Christine Straehle, 13–32. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, Lynne Rudder. 2015. Human persons as social entities. Journal of Social Ontology 1: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, Peter Brian. 2012. Evil and moral psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, Christopher. 1992. Ordinary men: Reserve police battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of war. When is life grievable. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Calder, Todd. 2013. Is evil just very wrong? Philosophical Studies 163: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calder, Todd. 2015. Evil and its opposite. Journal of Value Inquiry 49: 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Card, Claudia. 2002. The atrocity paradigm: A theory of evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christman, John. 2004. Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves. Philosophical Studies 117: 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Wijze, Stephen. 2002. Defining evil: Insights from the problem of dirty hands. The Monist 85: 210–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodds, Susan. 2014. Dependence, care, and vulnerability. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 181–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2008. The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20: 1–23.Google Scholar
  15. Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2010. The vulnerable subject and the responsive state. Emory Law Journal 60: 251–275.Google Scholar
  16. Formosa, Paul. 2008. A conception of evil. Journal of Value Inquiry 42: 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Formosa, Paul. 2014. The role of vulnerability in Kantian ethics. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 88–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Frankfurt, Harry. 1998. The importance of what we care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. French, Peter A. 2011. War and moral dissonance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, Marilyn. 1991. The social self and the partiality debates. In Feminist ethics, ed. Claudia Card, 161–179. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  21. Fulbrook, Mary. 2012. A small town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Garrard, Eve. 1998. The nature of evil. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 1: 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garrard, Eve. 2002. Evil as an explanatory concept. The Monist 85: 320–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garrard, Eve, and David McNaughton. 2012. Speak no evil? Midwest Studies in Philosophy 36: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilson, Erinn C. 2014. The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Goldberg, Zachary J. 2017a. Evil and a worthwhile life. In Reflections on ethics and responsibility: Essays in honor of Peter A. French, ed. Zachary J. Goldberg, 145–164. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldberg, Zachary J. 2017b. Normative judgments and the narration of evil. In Das Böse erzählen, ed. Eike Brock, and Ana Honnacker, 63–82. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goodin, Robert E. 1987. Exploiting a situation and exploiting a person. In Modern theories of exploitation, ed. Andrew Reeve, 166–200. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Held, Virginia. 1987. Non-contractual society: A feminist view. Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary 13: 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kekes, John. 1990. Facing evil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kekes, John. 2005. The roots of evil. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Landesman, Peter. 2002. A woman’s work. The NY Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/15/magazine/a-woman-s-work.html?pagewanted=all&pagewanted=print. Accessed: 25 April 2017.
  34. Lifton, Robert Jay. 2000. The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. MacKenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mackenzie, Catriona. 2014. The importance of relational autonomy and capabilities for an ethics of vulnerability. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 33–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  38. McGinn, Colin. 1997. Ethics, evil, and fiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, Sarah Clark. 2012. The ethics of need: agency, dignity, and obligation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Morton, Adam. 2004. On evil. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nedelsky, Jennifer. 1989. Reconceiving autonomy: Sources, thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36.Google Scholar
  42. Neiman, Susan. 2002. Evil in modern thought: An alternative history of philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Neiman, Susan. 2009. Moral clarity: A guide for grown-up idealists. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  44. Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Oshana, Marina A.L. 1998. Personal Autonomy and Society. Journal of Social Philosophy 29: 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oshana, Marina A.L. 2006. Personal autonomy in society. New York: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  47. Perrett, Roy. 2002. Evil and human nature. The Monist 85: 304–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rachels, James. 2004. Drawing Lines. In Animal rights, ed. Cass R. Sunstein, and Martha C. Nussbaum, 162–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  50. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  51. Reader, Soran. 2007. Needs and moral necessity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, Luke. 2007. Is evil action qualitatively distinct from ordinary wrongdoing? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85: 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell, Luke. 2012. Evil and incomprehensibility. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 36: 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell, Luke. 2014. Evil: A philosophical investigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sample, Ruth J. 2003. Exploitation: What it is and why it’s wrong. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  56. Sandel, Michael J. 1984. The procedural republic and the unencumbered self. Political Theory 12: 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scheffler, Samuel. 1997. Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26: 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schildrick, Margarit. 2002. Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Scully, Jackie Leach. 2014. Disability and vulnerability: On bodies, dependence, and power. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 204–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Singer, Marcus G. 2004. The concept of evil. Philosophy 79: 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
  62. Steiner, Hillel. 2002. Calibrating evil. The Monist 85: 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas, Laurence. 1993. Vessels of evil: American slavery and the Holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Turner, Bryan S. 2006. Vulnerability and human rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Vetlesen, Arne Johan. 2005. Evil and human agency: Understanding collective evildoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wallace, R.Jay. 2012. Duties of love. Aristotelian Society Supplementary 86: 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waller, James E. 2002. Becoming evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Waller, James E. 2014. The ordinariness of extraordinary evil: The making of perpetrators of genocide and mass killing. In Ordinary people as mass murderers: Perpetrators in comparative perspectives, ed. Olaf Jensen, and Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann, 145–164. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Walzer, Michael. 1995. The communitarian critique of liberalism. In New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities, ed. Amitai Etzioni, 71–89. London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wertheimer, Alan. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Zimbardo, Philip. 2008. The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations