Breaking the mold: a new type of multilateral sustainable development negotiation
Participants in the Open Working Group (OWG) on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were reminded time and again that there is no model for the process to develop the SDGs. They resolved to not repeat the closed process used to develop the Millennium Development Goals, but the OWG began work when failures to reach consensus and fatigue with multilateral environmental negotiations dominated delegates’ minds, rather than examples of successfully negotiated outcomes. The OWG Co-Chairs were faced with the daunting task of guiding delegates’ efforts to develop a proposed set of crisp SDGs and targets that all could agree to, and thus, had to accomplish the following goals: (1) reduce delegation rigidity, both of individual Member States and within coalitions; (2) maximize the sense of participation, transparency, and ownership to get the most buy-in at the end; and (3) develop a sense of trust that would change the relationship between Member States. To do this, the OWG Co-Chairs broke the mold of UN multilateral negotiations that Member States and observers had become familiar with and created a different approach. This article examines how the OWG accomplished these goals and overcame the shortcomings of other multilateral negotiating processes on sustainable development to produce a widely supported consensus outcome at a time when governments have struggled to achieve agreement in many multilateral negotiation tracks.
KeywordsPost-2015 development agenda Sustainable Development Goals United Nations Negotiations Environment Development
Group of 77
Latin American and Caribbean Group
Millennium Development Goals
Open Working Group
Sustainable Development Goals
United Nations Conference on Environment and Development
United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
United Nations General Assembly
Western European and Others Group
- Blavoukos, S., & Bourantonis, D. (2011). Chairing multilateral negotiations: the case of the United Nations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Busby, J. W. (2010). After Copenhagen: Climate governance and the road ahead. Working Paper. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
- Chair’s Summary. (2011). High level dialogue on institutional framework for sustainable development, 19–21 July 2011, Solo, Indonesia. http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/Chairs%20Summary%20from%20Solo%20meeting.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Chasek, P. S. (2001). Earth negotiations: Analyzing thirty years of environmental diplomacy. Tokyo: UNU Press.Google Scholar
- Chasek, P. S., & Wagner, L. M. (2012). An Insider’s Guide to Multilateral Environmental Negotiations Since the Earth Summit. In P. S. Chasek & L. M. Wagner (Eds.), The roads from Rio: Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations (pp. 1–16). New York: RFF Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chasek, P. S., Wagner, L. M., & Doran, P. (2012). Lessons learned on the roads from Rio. In P. S. Chasek & L. M. Wagner (Eds.), The roads from Rio: Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations (pp. 253–272). New York: RFF Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Colombia and Guatemala. (2011). Rio+20: Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A proposal from the Governments of Colombia and Guatemala. http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/colombiasdgs.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2011). Inputs of the Government of Colombia to draft zero of the outcome document. http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/372Colombia.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Davenport, D., Wagner, L. M., & Spence, C. (2012). Earth negotiations on a Comfy Couch: Building negotiator trust through innovative processes. In P. S. Chasek & L. M. Wagner (Eds.), The roads from Rio: Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations (pp. 39–58). New York: RFF Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Depledge, J., & Chasek, P. S. (2012). Raising the tempo: The escalating pace and intensity of environmental negotiations. In P. S. Chasek & L. M. Wagner (Eds.), The roads from Rio: Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations (pp. 19–38). New York: RFF Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
- Frankel, S., & Regan, M. (2011). The PGA handbook: A practical guide to the United Nations General Assembly. New York: Permanent Mission of Switzerland to the United Nations. http://www.unitar.org/ny/sites/unitar.org.ny/files/UN_PGA_Handbook.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Hoffmann, M. J. (2005). Ozone depletion and climate change: Constructing a global response. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Hopmann, P. T. (1996). The negotiation process and the resolution of international conflicts. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- IISD. (2012a). Summary of the Initial Discussions on the “Zero Draft” of the Outcome Document for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development: 25–27 January 2012. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 27(16) (30 January). http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb2716e.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- IISD. (2012b). Summary of the UNCSD Informal Informal Consultations: 23 April–4 May 2012. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 27(35) (7 May). http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb2735e.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- IISD. (2012c). UNCSD informal consultations: Tuesday, 19 June 2012. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 27(48) (20 June). http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb2748e.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- IISD. (2014). Summary of the thirteenth session of the UN General Assembly Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals: 14–19 July 2014. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 32(13) (22 July). http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb3213e.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Kolb, D. M., & Faure, G. (1994). Organization theory: The interface of structure, culture, procedures and negotiation processes. In I. W. Zartman (Ed.), International multilateral negotiations: Approaches to the management of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Meilstrup, P. (2010). The runaway summit: The background story of the Danish presidency of COP15, the UN Climate Change Conference. In N. Hvidt, & H. Mouritzen (Eds.), Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS: pp. 113–135. http://subweb.diis.dk/graphics/Publications/Books2010/YB2010/YB2010-Runaway-summit_WEB.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- OWG. (2014). Focus areas document. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/3276focusareas.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested games: Rational choice in comparative politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- UN. (1992). Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
- UN General Assembly. (2012). The future we want. A/RES.66/288 (11 September). http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288&Lang=E. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- UN General Assembly. (2014). Report of the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals established pursuant to General Assembly resolution 66/288. A/RES/68/309 (12 September 2014). http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/309. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- Wagner, L. M., Hajjar, R., & Appleton, A. (2012). Global alliances to strange bedfellows: The Ebb and flow of negotiating coalitions. In P. S. Chasek & L. M. Wagner (Eds.), The roads from Rio: Lessons learned from twenty years of multilateral environmental negotiations. New York: RFF Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zartman, I. W., & Berman, M. (1982). The practical negotiator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar