Advertisement

The challenges of the post-COP21 regime: interpreting CBDR in the INDC context

  • Zou Ji
  • Fu Sha
Postface

Introduction

All countries should prepare intended nationally determined contributions (INDC) and publish them ahead of COP21. However, fundamental questions such as how to establish long-term targets beyond 2020, how to enforce the common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR), and respective capabilities (RC) principle remain unanswered. Even a precise definition of the notion of INDCs remains unsettled; these might be the source of protracted misunderstanding between Parties. The papers in this Special Issue provide very useful and innovative material about how the notion of equitable access to development enables the provision of credible responses to these questions. In this article, we add some additional insights showing how framing these challenge in terms of bifurcations towards innovative development allows for defining the CBDR principle as a precondition and the key driver of a cooperative process beneficial for all Parties in terms of the sustainability of their...

Keywords

CBDR INDC Invention of development paths Climate change 

Abbreviations

CBDR

Common but differentiated responsibilities

GCF

Global climate fund

GHG

Greenhouse gas

INDC

Intended nationally determined contributions

IPCC

Intergovernmental panel on climate change

LDCs

Least developed countries

MNCs

Multinational corporations

RC

Respective capabilities

R&D

Research and development

UNFCCC

United Nations framework convention on climate change

References

  1. Aglietta, M., Hourcade, J.-C., Jaeger, C. C., & Perrissin Fabert, B. (2015). Financing transition in an adverse context: Climate finance beyond carbon finance. In International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics.Google Scholar
  2. CDIAC. (2013). Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC) [WWW Document]. URL http://cdiac.ornl.gov/. Accessed Aug 9, 15.
  3. Hourcade, J.-C., & Ghersi, F. (2002). The economics of a lost deal: Kyoto–The Hague–Marrakesh. The Energy Journal, 23, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P. R., & Cassen, C. (2015). Climate policy architecture for the Cancun’s paradigm shift: Building upon the lessons from history. In International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics.Google Scholar
  5. Krugman, P. (2009). The return of depression economics and the crisis of 2008 (Reprint ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  6. Méjean, A., Lecocq, F., & Mulugetta, Y. (2015). Equity, burden sharing and development pathways: Reframing international climate negotiations. In International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics.Google Scholar
  7. Rajan, R. (2010). Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. The World Bank. (2014). Data | The World Bank [WWW Document]. URL http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed Sept 9, 15).
  9. UNCTAD. (2008). World investment report, transnational corporations, agricultural production and development. United Nations, New York and Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Climate Change Strategy and International CooperationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations