Advertisement

Indo-Iranian Journal

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Pāṇinian accounts of the Vedic subjunctive:

leṭ kr̥ṇvaíte
  • Peter M. Scharf
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

To determine which Vedic texts Pāṇini knew requires a comprehensive approach that establishes a high correlation between the complete set of linguistic traits his treatise describes and the complete set of linguistic traits exhibited in each text in question. The examination of individual linguistic traits is inadequate to determine which texts he knew because neither the Vedic nor the grammatical tradition is uniform and static. Bronkhorst (Pāṇinian Studies: Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, p. 75, 1991) calls into question the assumption that Vedic texts were known to Pāṇini in the form we have received them, while Cardona (Pāṇinian Studies: Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume, p. 130, 1991) shows that Pāṇini’s silence concerning certain Vedic forms may be due to deference to certain received exegetical traditions. The current paper considers a case where the Pāṇinian grammatical tradition entertains disagreement over the derivation of obscure forms. Doubt concerning the recurrence of the term pit (3.4.92) into 3.4.94 brings into question whether Pāṇini systematically accounts for stem strengthening in the present subjunctive. Kātyāyana, Patañjali, Jayāditya, and Jinendrabuddhi remain silent on the point. Rāmacandra, Śrīkriṣṇa, and Bhaṭṭojidīkṣita assert that pit recurs, thereby allowing stem strengthening. Haradatta, on the other hand, maintains that a rule of indeterminate variation, 3.4.117 chandasy ubhayathā, accounts for it. Nāgeśa points out that the latter procedure is more comprehensive in that it accounts for the lack of stem strengthening in exceptional forms, such as kr̥ṇvaíte in the R̥gveda. The implication is that the former procedure fails to account for the form, which, if Pāṇini’s knowledge of texts were to be established based upon the consideration of individual traits, would imply the absurdity that Pāṇini, as interpreted by Rāmacandra et al. did not know the R̥gveda. On the contrary, however, the procedure of Rāmacandra et al. can employ another rule of indeterminate variation: 3.1.85 vyatyayo bahulam. This procedure, which provides a systematic explanation of the present subjunctive generally and requires a rule of indeterminate variation only to account for exceptional forms, is preferable to leaving the account of stem strengthening in the present subjunctive generally to a rule of indeterminate variation. Since both procedures rely on rules of indeterminate variation to account for the R̥gvedic form, however, it is impossible to establish either Pāṇini’s knowledge or ignorance of the text on the basis of his account of the subjunctive. The controversy demonstrates that the depth and variety of the Indian grammatical tradition must be taken into account in determining which rules describe which linguistic facts and that it is inadequate to consider individual traits. A comprehensive approach is required.

Keywords

Verbal Termination Vedic Text Interpretational Tradition Indeterminate Variation Grammatical Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aithal, K. P. (1996). Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī and Vedic ritual literature. In D. B. Kapp (Ed.), Nānāvidhaikatā: Festschrift für Hermann Berger (pp. 1–7). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, B. P. (1986). Vedic grammar: Vaidikavyakaranam: Bhaṭṭojidīkṣitaviracitā Vaidikī Prakriyā: text, English translation, Sanskrit exposition, and exhaustive grammatical notes with illustrations. Calcutta: Sanskrit Pustak Bhandar. Google Scholar
  3. Bhawe, S. S. (1953). Pāṇini’s rules and vedic interpretation. In Proceedings (and transactions) of the All-India oriental conference (vol. 17, pp. 231–240). (Ahmedabad, 1953). Google Scholar
  4. Bhawe, S. S. (1955). Pāṇini’s rules and vedic interpretation. In S.K. Chatterji jubilee volume: presented on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday (26th November, 1955) (pp. 237–249). IL 16. Google Scholar
  5. Bhawe, S. S. (1957–62). The soma hymns of the R̥gveda: a fresh interpretation. 3 vols. The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda Research Series 3, 5, 6. Baroda: Oriental Institute. Google Scholar
  6. Bronkhorst, J. (1980). Theoretical aspects of Pāṇini’s grammar. Leiden: Leiden University. [Ph.D. diss. Leiden]. Google Scholar
  7. Bronkhorst, J. (1981). The orthoepic diaskeuasis of the R̥gveda and the date of Pāṇini. Indo-Iranian Journal, 23, 83–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronkhorst, J. (1991). Pāṇini and the Veda reconsidered. In M. M. Deshpande & S. Bhate (Eds.), Pāṇinian Studies: Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume (pp. 75–121). Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of Michigan, no. 37. Ann Arbor: The Univesity of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies. Google Scholar
  9. Bronkhorst, J. (1996). Pāṇini and the Kaṭhas. In H.-P. Schmidt & A. Wezler (Eds.), Veda-Vyākaraṇa-Vyākhyāna: Festschrift Paul Thieme zum 90. Geburtstag am 18. März 1995 dargebracht von Schülern, Freunden und Kollegen (pp. 59–65). StII 20. Google Scholar
  10. Cardona, G. (1972). Review of Hoffmann (1967). Kratylos 15.1 (1970 [1972]): 47–51. Google Scholar
  11. Cardona, G. (1984). On the Mahābhāṣya evidence for a Pāṇinīya Dhātupāṭha without meaning entries. In S. D. Joshi (Ed.), Am r̥tadhārā: Prof. R. N. Dandekar Felicitation Volume (pp. 79–84). Delhi: Ajanta Publications. Google Scholar
  12. Cardona, G. (1991). On Pāṇini, Śākalya, Vedic dialects and Vedic exegetical traditions. In M. M. Deshpande & S. Bhate (Eds.), Pāṇinian Studies: Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume (pp. 123–134). Google Scholar
  13. Cardona, G. (1997a). Pāṇini: his work and its traditions. Vol. 1, Background and Introduction, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 2d. Google Scholar
  14. Cardona, G. (1997b). Vedic tradition and descriptions of grammarians. In M. Witzel (Ed.), Inside the Texts, Beyond the Texts: New Approaches to the Study of the Vedas (pp. 33–38). HOS Opera Minora 2. Cambridge: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University. Google Scholar
  15. Cardona, G. (1997c). Escape rules in Pāṇini: Sūtras of the type ‘anyebhyo ’pi dr̥śyate’. In Xth World Sanskrit Conference, International Association of Sanskrit Studies, January 3–9, 1997, Taralabalu Kendra, Bangalore 560 032, India, English Abstracts, (pp. 412–413). New Delhi: Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. Google Scholar
  16. Cardona, G. (1999). Recent Research in Pāṇinian Studies. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Google Scholar
  17. Cardona, G. (2005). Pāṇinian sūtras of the type anyebhyo ’pi dr̥śyate. In M. A. Dhaky & J. B. Shah (Eds.), Jambūjyoti: Munivara Jambūvijaya Festschrift (pp. 91–107). Shresthi Kasturbhai Lalbhai Smarak Nidhi volume 7. Ahmedabad: Shresthi Kasturbhai Lalbhai Smarak Nidhi, Sharadaben Chimanbhai Educational Research Centre. Google Scholar
  18. Deshpande, M. M. (1991). Pāṇinian reflections on Vedic infinitives: On infinitives with -tosUN and -KasUN. In M. M. Deshpande (Ed.) Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit conference, Vol. V, Pāṇini and the Veda (pp. 19–31). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
  19. Devasthali, G. V. (1963). Sāyaṇa utilising Pāṇini in his R̥g-veda bhāṣya. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, new series, 38, 165–173. Google Scholar
  20. Devasthali, G. V. (1965). Pāṇini as an aid to R̥gvedic interpretation. In S. N. Gajendragadhkar & S. A. Upadhyay (Eds.), H.D. Velankar commemoration volume: a volume of Indological studies by his students presented to Professor H.D. Velankar on the occasion of his seventy-second birthday on 3rd October 1965 (pp. 20–26). Bombay: Professor H.D. Velankar Commemoration Volume Committee. Google Scholar
  21. Devasthali, G. V. (1967). Pāṇini and R̥gvedic exegesis. Indian Antiquary, third series 2.3, 1-8. Google Scholar
  22. Devasthali, G. V. (1968). Pāṇini and R̥gvedic exegesis. ABORI, 48–49, 7. [Reprint PCASS A 22]. Google Scholar
  23. Dīkṣita, P. (1997). lakārāṇāṁ punarvyavasthāpanam. In Xth World Sanskrit Conference, International Association of Sanskrit Studies, January 3-9, 1997, Taralabalu Kendra, Bangalore: Sanskrit Abstracts, pp. 187–189. New Delhi: Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan. [Sanskrit]. Google Scholar
  24. Franke, R. O. (1891a). Review of Liebich 1891. Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen 1891: 951–983. Google Scholar
  25. Franke, R. O. (1891b). Was ist Sanskrit? (Bezzenbergers) Beiträge zur Kunde der indogermanischen Sprachen 17: 54–90. Göttingen. Google Scholar
  26. Geldner, K. F. (1951). Der Rig-veda. Part 2. Harvard Oriental Series 34. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Gopal Shastri. (1987). Aṣṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. Gopal Dutt Pande (Ed.), Chaukhamba Surbharati Granthamala 19. 3d. Vārāṇasī : Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan. Google Scholar
  28. Hoffmann, K. (1967). Der Injunktiv im Veda: Eine synchronische Funktionsuntersuchung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter. Google Scholar
  29. Joshi, S. D., & Bhate, S. V. (1984). The Fundamentals of Anuvr̥tti. Pune: University of Poona. PCASS B9. Pune: University of Poona. Google Scholar
  30. Kielhorn, L. F. (Ed.) (1985). The Vyākaraṇa-mahābhāṣya of Patañjali. 3 vols. Third edition revised and furnished with additional readings references and select critical notes by K. V. Abhyankar. Pune: BORI, 1962, 1965, 1972, Reprint: 1985. Google Scholar
  31. Kiparsky, P. (1980). Pāṇini as a Variationist. S. D. Joshi (Ed.), Publications of the Centre of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, Class B, no. 6. Pune: Centre of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, University of Poona, in collaboration with the MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google Scholar
  32. Kuiper. (1965). Review of Bhawe 1957-62. Indo-Iranian Journal, 8, 245–247. Google Scholar
  33. Kumārī, A. (1990-91). leṭ lakāra: eka vivecana. Kurukshetra University Research Journal: Arts and Humanities, 24-25, 330–340. [Hindi]. Google Scholar
  34. Laddu, S. D. (1969). The laukika, vaidika and yājñika accentuation with the munitraya of Sanskrit grammar. In G. V. Devasthali (Ed.), Professor R. N. Dandekar felicitation volume (pp. 93–111). Indian Antiquary, third series 3. Bombay: Popular Prakashan. Google Scholar
  35. Laddu, S. D. (1971a). Ancient Sanskrit grammarians and the literary records. Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal, 9, 315–322. Google Scholar
  36. Laddu, S. D. (1971b). Vedic forms and Pāṇini: a glance. In R̥ṣikalpanyāsa [Festshcrift Rajeshwar Shastri Dravid], English section, pp. 54–68. Google Scholar
  37. Laddu, S. D. (1972). The device of contiguity as a key to interpreting Pāṇini’s rules. Center of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, Studies (E), 1, 157–171. Google Scholar
  38. Liebich, B. (1891). Pāṇini: ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der indischen Literatur und Grammatik. Leipzig: Haessel. [Reprint of chapter 5 In Staal 1972: 159-65.]. Google Scholar
  39. Lubotsky, A. (1997). A R̥gvedic Word Concordance. 2 parts. American Oriental Series 82. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society. Google Scholar
  40. Mayank, M. (1991). Pāṇini’s acquaintance with the Atharvaveda. In Madhav Murlidhar Deshpande (Ed.), Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. V, Pāṇini and the Veda (pp. 32–45). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
  41. Meenakshi, K. (1991). Vedic infinitive and Pāṇini. In Madhav Murlidhar Deshpande (Ed.), Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. V, Pāṇini and the Veda (pp. 46–54). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
  42. Mishra, J. (1994). Pāṇini’s approach to chandas. In B. Banerjee, M. K. Gangopadhyay, D. Ghosh & R. Basu (Eds.), Cultura Indica, Tributes to an Indologist: Professor Dr. Asoke Chatterjee Sastri (pp. 91–92). Delhi: Sharada Publishing House. Google Scholar
  43. Miśra, M. (Ed.). (1980). Prakriyākaumudī by Rāmacandrācārya with Prakāśa by Śrīk r̥ṣṇa. [Rāmacandrācārya-praṇītā Prakriyākaumudī Śrīk r̥ṣṇa-viracitayā Prakāśa-vyākhyayā saṁvalitā.] Part 3. Sarasvatībhavana-granthamālā 112. Varanasi: Research Institute, Sampurnanand Sanskrit Vishvavidyalaya. Google Scholar
  44. Miśra, Ś. (Ed.). (1985). Kāśikāvr̥tti of Jayāditya and Vāmana: Along with Commentaries Vivaraṇapañcikā-Nyāsa of Jinendrabuddhi and Padamañjarī of Haradatta Miśra. 6 Parts. Varanasi: Ratna Publications. Google Scholar
  45. Miśra, Ś., (Ed. trans.). (1986). Pāṇinīyavyākaraṇasūtravr̥tti Kāśikā of Vāmana and Jayāditya. Ed. with the Prakāśa Hindi Commentary and Introduction. 2 Parts. Kāśī Sanskrit Series 37. 6d. Vārāṇasī : Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sanasthan. Google Scholar
  46. Nāgeśa. (1996, 1998, 1998). B r̥hat-śabdenduśekhara. [Nāgeśabhaṭṭa-viracito Br̥hacchabdenduśekharaḥ.] Ed. Śrī Sītārāmaśāstrī. 3 parts (continuously paginated). Sarasvatī bhavana-granthamālā 87. Varanasi: Research Institute, Sampurnanand Sanskrit University. Google Scholar
  47. Palsule, G. B. (1972a). Pāṇini 3.4.87-8 vis-à-vis Vedic imperatives in -si. In B. R. Saksena, S. P. Chaturvedi & A. P. Misra (Eds.), K. C. Chaṭṭopādhyāya felicitation volume, (2 vols. paginated continuously 1971–72), vol. 2., pp. 443–53. Journal of the Ganganāth Jhā Kendrīya Sanskrit Vidyāpeeth 27.3/4, 28.1/2. Google Scholar
  48. Palsule, G. B. (1972b). Pāṇini’s treatment of tense and mood formations. Center of Advanced Study in Sanskrit, Studies (E), 1, 173–183. [3.4.88]. Google Scholar
  49. Palsule, G. B. (1982). Two Vedic rules of Pāṇini: 8.3.47 and 8.3.10. In T. N. Dharmadhikari (Ed.), tilaka-mahārāṣṭra-vidyāpīṭha-śākhābhūta vaidika-saṁśodhana-maṇḍalena prakāśitaḥ suvarṇamahotsava-granthaḥ [Golden Jubilee volume, Vaidika Sanaśodhana Maṇḍala] (pp. 185–188). Pune: Vaidika Sanaśodhana Maṇḍala. Google Scholar
  50. Palsule, G. B. (1991). Pāṇini and the Vedic verbal system with special reference to the modal forms. In M. M. Deshpande (Ed.), Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Vol. V, Pāṇini and the Veda (pp. 55–64). Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar
  51. Pansikar, V. L. S. (Ed.). (1985). The Siddhāntakaumudī with Tattvabodhinī commentary of Jñānendrasarasvatī and Subodhinī commentary of Jayakr̥ṣṇa. [Tattvabodhinī-samākhya-vyākhyā-saṁvalitā Siddhāntakaumudī nāma Bhaṭṭojidīkṣita-praṇītā pāṇinīya-vyākaraṇa-sūtra-vr̥ttiḥ. Jñānendrasarasvatī-viracitottarakr̥dantāntaṁ Tattvabodhinī-vyākhyā, svara-vaidikyoḥ Jayakr̥ṣṇak r̥tā Subodhinī. Vāsudevaśarmaṇā ṭippaṇyādibhiḥ pariṣk r̥tā saṁśodhitā ca.] New Delhi: Meharcand Lachhmandass Publications. Google Scholar
  52. Patanjal, D. P. (1963). A critical study of R̥gveda (1.137-163), particularly from the point of view of Pāṇinian grammar. New Delhi: Patañjal Publications. Google Scholar
  53. Renou, L. (1960). La théorie des temps du verbe d’après les grammariens sanskrits. Journal Asiatique, 248, 305–337. Paris. [Reprint: In Staal 1972: 500-25.]. Google Scholar
  54. Śarma, I. (1994). siddhāntakaumudī vaidikī-prakriyā: eka samīkṣātmaka adhyayana [Pāṇini’s Vedic rules in the Siddhānta Kaumudī]. [Hindi] Delhi: Parimal Publications. Google Scholar
  55. Śarmā, R. & Kudāla, Ś. (Eds.). (1937). Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa Mahābhāṣya: with Kaiyaṭa’s Pradīpa and Nāgeśa’s Uddyota. Vol. 3 (adhyāya 3), Bombay: Nirnaya-Sagar Press. Google Scholar
  56. Schmid, W. P. (1960). Zum Problem k r̥ṇoti-karoti. Indogermanische Forschungen, 65(3), 235–248. Google Scholar
  57. Sharma, R. N. (1987, 1990, 1995, 1999, 2001, 2003). The Ashṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. 6 vols. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal. Google Scholar
  58. Sharma, A., Deshpande, K., & Padhye, D. G. (Eds.). (1969, 1970). Kāśikā: A Commentary on Pāṇini’s Grammar by Vāmana and Jayāditya 2 Parts. Sanskrit Academy Series nos. 17, 20. Hyderabad: Sanskrit Academy, Osmania University. Google Scholar
  59. Shastri, D. N. (1974). Vedic conjugational system. In Satyavrat Shastri, et al. (Eds.), Śrī-cārudeva-śāstry-abhinandana-granthaḥ [Charudeva Shastri felicitation volume] (pp. 294–298). Delhi: The Charudeva Shastri Felicitation Volume Committee. Google Scholar
  60. Shivaramaiah, B. K. (1969). A note on ‘bahulaṁ chandasi’. Mysore Orientalist, 2, 7–11. Google Scholar
  61. Thieme, P. (1935). Pāṇini and the Veda: Studies in the early history of linguistic science in India. Allahabad: Globe Press. Google Scholar
  62. van Nooten, B. A. (1967). Pāṇini’s replacement technique and the active finite verb. Language, 43, 883–902. Baltimore: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vasu, Ś. C. (1891). The Ashṭādhyāyī of Pāṇini. 2 vols. 1d Allahabad. Reprint: Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1980. Google Scholar
  64. Varma, S. (1950). The Vedic accent and the interpreters of Pāṇini. Journal of the Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 26, 1–9. Google Scholar
  65. Whitney, W. D. (1893a). On recent studies in Hindu grammar. American Journal of Philology, 14, 171–197. Reprint: Staal 1972: 165–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whitney, W. D. (1893b). The Veda in Pāṇini. Giornale della Società Asiatica Italiana, 7, 243–254. Rome. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ClassicsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations