Two Truths Theory: What is vyavahāra? Language as a Pointer to the Truth

Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Mādhyamikas argue that ultimate reality, which is without any delimitation and hence cannot be verbalized in itself (anakṣara), can be expressed in words on the basis of the attribution or superimposition (samāropa) of the basis for the application of the word (pravṛttinimitta). The denotation theory of ultimate reality Bhartṛhari advances in the Dravyasamuddeśa of his Vākyapadīya convincingly explains that, insofar as ultimate reality is spoken of, we must say that it is denoted by the word; ultimate reality is said to be ineffable only in the sense that it is far from what is conveyed as something by the word; language is a pointer to the ultimate reality. The point that the application of a word to ultimate reality depends on the attribution of the basis for the application of the word to it naturally leads to an idea that one should not hypostatize the basis, although without resorting to it any word cannot be used to convey the ultimate reality; otherwise, it would have to be said that the ultimate reality to which the word is applied has in essence the property which serves as the basis. Such a property is precisely what the Mādhyamikas consider to be the svabhāva ‘intrinsic nature’. What they understand by the term śūnyatā is precisely that everything has no real basis for the application of the word to it.

Keywords

Mādhyamika (Mādhyamaka) Bhartṛhari Ineffability Verbalization Superimposition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abbreviations and references

  1. A: Pāṇini’s Aṣṭādhyāyī. Appendix III (Aṣṭādhyāyīsūtrapāṭha) in Cardona.Google Scholar
  2. Abhyankar, Kashinath Vasudev. (1962–1972). The Vyākaraṇa-mahābhāṣya of Patañjali, edited by F. Kielhorn, third edition, revised and furnished with additional readings, references and select critical notes by K. V. Abhyankar. 3 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. 1: 1962; 2: 1965; 3: 1972.Google Scholar
  3. AMNS: Akṣayamatinirdeśasūtra. See Braarvig.Google Scholar
  4. BCAP: Prajākaramati’s Bodhicaryāvatārapañjikā. See de la Vallée Poussin 1901–1903 and Vaidya.Google Scholar
  5. Braarvig, J. (1993). Akṣayamatinirdeśasūtra. 2 vols. Vol. I: Edition of extant manuscripts with an index; vol. II: The tradition of imperishability in Buddhist thought. Oslo: Solum Forlag.Google Scholar
  6. Bronkhorst, J. (1987). Mahābhāṣyadīpikā of Bhartṛhari: Fascicule IV, Āhnika I. Post-graduate and Research Department Series 28. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar
  7. Cardona, G. (1997). Pāṇini, His Work and its Traditions. Volume I: Background and Introduction (2nd ed). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  8. de la Vallée Poussin, L. (1901–1903). Prajñākaramati’s Commentary to the Bodhicaryāvatāra of Çāntideva. Bibliotheca Indica 983, 1031. Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.Google Scholar
  9. de la Vallée Poussin, L. (1970). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. Bibliotheca Buddhica IV. Osnabrück: Biblio Verlag. First published 1903–1913.Google Scholar
  10. Eckel, M. D. (2008). Bhāviveka and His Buddhist Opponents. Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. 70. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gokhale, V. V., & Bahulkar, S. S. (1985). Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā Tarkajvālā: Chapter I. In Miscellanea Buddhica, Indiske Studier V, edited by Chr. Lindtner, 76–108. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  12. Heitmann, A. L. (2004). Nektar der Erkenntnis: Buddhistische Philosophie des 6. Jh.: Bhavyas Tarkajvālā I–III. 26. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Ichigo, M. (1985). Madhyamakālaṃkāra of Śāntarakṣita with his own commentary or Vṛtti and with the subcommentary or Pañjikā of Kamalaśīla. Kyoto: Buneido.Google Scholar
  14. Lindtner, C. (2001). Madhyamakahṛdayam of Bhavya. Chennai: The Adyar Library and Research Centre.Google Scholar
  15. MA: Candrakīrti’s Madhyamakāvatāra.Google Scholar
  16. MBh: Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇamahābhāṣya. See Abhyankar.Google Scholar
  17. MBhD: Bhartṛhari’s Mahābhāṣyadīpikā. See Bronkhorst.Google Scholar
  18. MHK: Bhāviveka’s Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā. See Lindtner.Google Scholar
  19. MMK: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. See de la Vallée Poussin 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Ogawa, H. (2000). Bhartṛhari on the Non-distinction between Reality and Unreality. Studies in the History of Indian Thought (Indo-shisōshi Kenkyū), 12, 5–27.Google Scholar
  21. Ogawa, H. (2005). gamyate, gamyamāna, gata, agata: the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā II, kk. 1–6 re-examined. The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic, 2, 68–75.Google Scholar
  22. Ogawa, H. (2006). What is bhāva?: a grammatical analysis of the term bhāva. The Annals of the Research Project Center for the Comparative Study of Logic, 3, 107–115.Google Scholar
  23. Ogawa, H. (2015). yathārthaḥ and yathātattvam: Bhartṛhari on defects in language. Tetsugaku (Hiroshima Philosophical Society) 67, 15–28.Google Scholar
  24. Paddhati: Vṛṣabhadeva’s Paddhati. See Subramania 1966.Google Scholar
  25. Prakāśa: Helārāja’s Prakāśa. See Subramania 1963.Google Scholar
  26. PrP: Candrakīrti’s Prasannapadā. See de la Vallée Poussin 1901–1903.Google Scholar
  27. Rau, W. (1977). Bhartṛharis Vākyapadīya: Die Mūlakārikās nach den Handschriften herausgegeben und mit einem Pāda-Index versehen. Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes XLII, 4. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag. [kārikā numbers are given according to Rau’s edition.]Google Scholar
  28. Saigusa, M. (1985). Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā-s: Text and Translation. Tokyo: Daisanbumei-sha.Google Scholar
  29. Salvini, M. (2011). Upādāyaprajñaptiḥ and the Meaning of Absolutives: Grammar and Syntax in the Interpretation of Madhyamaka. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siderits, M., & Katsura, S. (2013). Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Subramania Iyer, K. A. (1963). Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the Commentary of Helārāja, Kāṇḍa III, Part 1. Deccan College Monograph Series 21. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
  32. Subramania Iyer, K. A. (1966). Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari with the Commentaries Vṛtti and Paddhati of Vṛṣabhadeva. Deccan College Monograph Series 32. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
  33. Subramania Iyer, K. A. (1983). The Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari (An Ancient Treatise on the Philosophy of Sanskrit Grammar), Containing the Ṭīkā of Puṇyarāja and the Ancient Vṛtti, Kāṇḍa II, with a Foreword by Ashok Aklujkar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  34. Tanji, T. (2000). On Samāropa. In J. A. Silk (Ed.), Wisdom, compassion, and the search for understanding: The Buddhist Studies Legacy of Gadjin M. Nagao (pp. 347–368). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  35. TJ: Tarkajvālā of Bhavya (Bhāviveka). See Heitman.Google Scholar
  36. Uddyota: Nāgeśa’s Uddyota. See Vedavrata.Google Scholar
  37. Vaidya, P. L. (1988). Bodhicaryāvatāra of Śāntideva with the Commentary Pañjikā of Prajñākaramati. Buddhist Sanskrit Text Series 12. Darbhanga: Mithila Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Vedavrata. (1962–1963) Śrībhagavat-patañjali-viracitaṃ Vyākaraṇa-Mahā-bhāṣyam (Śrī-kaiyaṭa-kṛta-pradīpena nāgojībhaṭṭa-kṛtena-bhāṣya-pradīpoddyotena ca vibhūṣitam). 5 vols. Gurukul Jhajjar (Rohatak): Hairyāṇā-Sāhitya-Saṃsthānam.Google Scholar
  39. VP: Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya. See Rau.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Indian Philosophy, Graduate School of LettersHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations