Advertisement

Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 957–991 | Cite as

Cognizable Object in Tshad ma rigs gter According to Go rams pa

  • Artur Przybyslawski
Open Access
Article

Abstract

The article presents Go rams pa’s interpretation and classification of cognizable object as explained by Sa skya Paṇḍita in his famous Tshad ma rigs gter. The text consists of introduction to the translation of the original, translation of Go ram pa’s commentary to the first chapter of Tshad ma rigs gter, edition of the original, and outline of the Tibetan text.

Keywords

Valid cognition Cognizable object Appearing object Conceived object Apprehended object Object of engagement 

References

Primary Sources

  1. A—Vasubandhu, Abhidharmakośa [chos mngon mdzod], D4089, mngon pa, ku.Google Scholar
  2. AS—Asaṅga, Abhidharmasamuccaya [mngon pa kun btus], D 4049, sems tsam, ri.Google Scholar
  3. C—Candrakīrti, Madhyamakāvatāra [dbu ma la ‘jug pa], ed. by Louis de la Vallé Poussin, (Bibliotheca Buddhica 9), St. Petersbourg 1912.Google Scholar
  4. D—Devendrabuddhi, Pramāṇavārttikapañjikā [Tshad ma rnam ‘grel gyi dka’ ‘grel], D4217, tshad ma, che.Google Scholar
  5. G—Go rams pa bsod nams seng ge, dpal sa skya pa’i tshad ma rig pa’i gzhung gces bsdus, New Delhi: Institute of Tibetan Classics 2006, pp. 40-49 (bod kyi gtsug lag gces bdus vol. 20).Google Scholar
  6. PV—Pramāṇavārttika-kārikā [Tshad ma rnam ‘grel] D: 4210, P: 5709, Y. Miyasaka, ed. (Sanskrit-Tibetan), Acta Indologica 2 (1971–72).Google Scholar
  7. PVin—Steinkellner, E. (Ed.). (2007) Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya, Chapters 1 and 2. Beijing/Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House/Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  8. TR—Sa skya Paṇḍita [Sa skya paNDi ta kun dga’ rgyal mtshan], Tshad ma rigs pa’i gter gyi rtsa ba dang ‘grel, Varanasi, Sarnath: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies [Sakya Students’ Union] 2008.Google Scholar
  9. S—Śākya mchog ldan, Tshad ma’i mdo dang gzhung lugs sde bdun gyi de kho na nyid bsdus pa in: blo gros mtha’ yas pa’i mdzod, Kathmandu: Rigpe Dorje Publications 2009, vol. 12.Google Scholar
  10. Nāgārjuna, Śūnyatāsaptati, Sarnath-Varanasi: Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Hugon P. (Ed.), mTshur ston gZhon nu seng ge, Tshad ma shes rab sgron ma (2004), Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien (Wiener Studien Zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 60).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Arnold, D. (2005). Buddhists, brahmins, and belief. Epistemology in South Asian philosophy of religion. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, D. (2008). Buddhist idealism, epistemic and otherwise: Thoughts on the alternating perspectives of Dharmakīrti. Sophia, 47(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. bod rgya tshad ma rig pa’i tshig mdzod (1988). Beijing: People’s Publication House.Google Scholar
  4. Cabezón, J. I., & Dargyay, L. (2006). Freedom from extremes. Go rams pa’s “Distinguishing the Views” and the polemics of emptiness. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Dreyfus, G. B. J. (1997). Recognizing reality: Dharmakīrti’s philosophy and Its Tibetan interpretations. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Dunne, J. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakrti’s philosophy. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Dunne, J. (2006). Realizing the unreal: Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34, 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eltschinger V. (2014), Buddhist Epistemology as Apologetics: Studies on the History, Self-understanding and Dogmatic Foundations of Late Indian Buddhist Philosophy (Beitrage Zur Kultur- Und Geistesgeschichte Asiens), Wien: Verlag der Österreich. Akad. der Wiss.Google Scholar
  9. Kajiyama, Y. (1973). Three kinds of affirmation and two kinds of negation in Buddhist philosophy. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 17, 161–175.Google Scholar
  10. Kellner B. (2011). Dharmakīrti’s criticism of external realism and the sliding scale of analysis. In: Helmut Krasser, Horst Lasic, Eli Franco, Birgit Kellner (ed.): Religion and Logic in Buddhist Philosophical Analysis. Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference. Vienna, August 23–27, 2005. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2011, 291–298.Google Scholar
  11. Kellner, B. (2014). Changing frames in Buddhist thought: The concept of Ākāra in Abhidharma and in Buddhist epistemological analysis. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42(2–3), 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McClintock, S. (2014). Kamalaśīla on the nature of phenomenal content (ākāra) in cognition: A close reading of TSP ad TS 3626 and related passages. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42(2–3), 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moriyama, S. (2014). Ratnākaraśānti’s theory of cognition with false mental images (*alīkākāravāda) and the Neither-One-Nor-Many Argument. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42(2–3), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pind, O. (1991). Dignāga on śabdasāmānya and śabdaviśeṣa. In Ernst Steinkellner (Ed.), Studies in the Buddhist epistemological tradition (pp. 269–280). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  15. Ruegg, D. S. (1994). Pramāṇabhūta, *Pramāṇa(bhūta)-puruṣa, Pratyakṣadharman and Sākṣātkṛtadharma as Epithets of the Ṛṣi, Ācārya and Tathāgata in Grammatical, Epistemological and Madhyamaka Texts. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1994(57), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silk, J. A. (2002). Possible Indian sources for the Term tshad ma’i skyes bu as pramānapurura. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30, 111–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steinkellner, E. (2004). Tshad ma’i skyes bu. Meaning and historical significance of the term. In E. Steinkellner & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Contributions on Tibetan Buddhist religion and philosophy (pp. 275–284). Vienna: Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie.Google Scholar
  18. Steinkellner E. (1977). Verse-Index of Dharmakīrti’s works (Tibetan versions), Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien (Wiener Studien Zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 1).Google Scholar
  19. Stoltz, J. (2006). Sakya Pandita and the Status of Concepts. Philosophy East & West, 56(4), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tillemans, T. J. F. (1999). Scripture, logic, language. Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan successors. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Van Bijlert V. A. (1989), Epistemology and Spiritual Authority. The Development of Epistemology and Logic in the Old Nyāya and the Buddhist School of Epistemology with an Annotated Translation of Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika II (Pramāṇasiddhi) vv. 1-7. Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  22. Van der Kuijp, L. W. J. (1983). Contributions to the development of Tibetan Buddhist epistemology. From the eleventh to the thirteenth century. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  23. Yoshimizu, C. (2004). Defining and redefining Svalakṣaṇa: Dharmakīrti’s concept and its Tibetan modification. In M. Tachikawa, S. Hino, & T. Wada (Eds.), Three mountains and seven rivers: Prof. Musashi Tachikawa’s felicitation volume (pp. 117–133). Delhi: Matilal Banarsidass Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Yoshimizu C. (2007). Causal efficacy and spatiotemporal restriction: An analytical study of the Sautrāntika philosophy. In: B. Kellner, H. Krasser, H. Lasic, M.T. Much, H. Tauscher (Eds.), Pramāṇakīrtiḥ. Papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Part 2. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 70.2, Wien 2007, pp. 1049–1078.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Comparative Studies of CivilisationsJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations