Abstract
Arthāpatti (postulation) does not depend on observation of pervasion or background belief. It is certain in the sense that when S cognizes P through postulation, no other epistemic instrument (pramāṇa) would invalidate P. The Naiyāyika tries to reduce postulation to anumāna and/or tarka. I shall argue that it is neither. Due to its explanatory role, one may think that postulation plays an essential role in lakṣaṇā or indication. But this too is a misconception. Both tarka and lakṣaṇā depend on observation and background knowledge. Neither of them has the epistemic certainty postulation enjoys. I think, due to its observation-independent nature and certainty, postulation can be seen as the source of the knowledge of the truths of reason.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AVM :
-
Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā by Mukulabhaṭṭa.
- CP :
-
Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, 1931–1935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7–8, 1958, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
- KKK :
-
Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya by Śrī Harṣa.
- TCM :
-
The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Tattvacintāmaṇi by Gaṅgeśa.
- SV :
-
The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Ślokavārttika by Kumārilabhaṭṭa.
References
Avasthi, B., & Avasthi, I. (1977). Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā. Delhi: Indu Prakashan.
Bhaṭṭācārya, S. (2000). Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādyam of Śrī Harṣa (Pramātva-khaṇḍanam). Kolkata: Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.
Das, N. (2011). Lakṣaṇā as inference. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39(4–5), 353–366.
Dasgupta, S. N. (1952). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dvivedi, R. (1973). Abhidhāvṛttimātṛkā of Mukulabhaṭṭa. Vidyābhavan Samskṛta Granthamālā 165. Varanasi.
Granoff, P. (1978). Philosophy and argument in Late Vedānta: Śrī Harṣa’s Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Guha, N. (2008). Arthāpatti: A critical examination. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, XXV(4), 107–133.
Guha, N. (2012a). Tarka as cognitive validator. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(1), 44–66.
Guha, N. (2012b). Lakṣaṇā as a creative function of language. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(5), 489–509.
Kang, S. Y. (2010). An inquiry into the definition of tarka in Nyāya tradition and its connotation of negative speculation. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38(1), 1–23.
Kapitan, T. (1992). Peirce and the autonomy of abductive reasoning. Erkenntnis, 37, 1–26.
Kasturirangan, R., Guha, N., & Chakravarthi, R. (2011). Indian cognitivism and the phenomenology of conceptualization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 277–296.
Keating, M. (2013). Mukulabhaṭṭa’s defense of Lakṣaṇā: How we use words to mean something else, but not everything else. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(4), 439–461.
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. New York: Routledge.
Matilal, B. K. (1986). Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Matilal, B. K. (1998). In J. Ganeri & H. Tiwari (Eds.), The character of logic in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Narasimha, R. (2007). Epistemology and language in Indian astronomy and mathematics. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 521–541.
Sarma, K. V. (Ed.). (1976). Siddhāntadarpaṇam of Nīlakaṇṭhasomayājī with auto-commentary. Hoshiarpur: Panjab University.
Sastri, A. C. (1929). Bṛhatī of Prabhakara Misra with the Ṛjuvimala of Mahamahopadhyaya Salikanatha Misra. Banaras: The Secretary, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Sastri, S. K. R. (1971). Ślokavārtika of Kumārila with Tātparya-ṭīkā of Uṃveka Bhaṭṭa. Madras: University of Madras.
Suali, L. (1905). Ṣaḍdarśanasamuccaya of Haribhadra with commentary Tarkarahasyadīpikā. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.
Śāstrī, A., & Pansikar, V. L. S. (Eds.). (1982). Brahmasūtra Śāṅkara Bhāṣya with the commentaries Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimala. Varanasi: Krishnadas Acaemy.
Śāstrī, T. (2007). Siddhāntabindu of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī. Banaras: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan.
Śāstrī, T. G. (1917). The Śābdanirṇaya by Prakāśātmayatīndra. Trivandrum Sanskrit Series 53. Trivandrum.
Sharma, B. N. K. (1962). The philosophy of Sri Madhvacharya. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.
Tailanga, G. S. (1896). The Nyāyasūtras with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya. Benares: E. J. Lazarus & Co.
Tarkavagish, K. (1990). Tattvacintāmaṇi of Gaṅgeśa (Vol. II, Part 1). Chaukhamba: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guha, N. On Arthāpatti . J Indian Philos 44, 757–776 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9280-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-015-9280-9