Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 757–776 | Cite as

On Arthāpatti



Arthāpatti (postulation) does not depend on observation of pervasion or background belief. It is certain in the sense that when S cognizes P through postulation, no other epistemic instrument (pramāṇa) would invalidate P. The Naiyāyika tries to reduce postulation to anumāna and/or tarka. I shall argue that it is neither. Due to its explanatory role, one may think that postulation plays an essential role in lakṣaṇā or indication. But this too is a misconception. Both tarka and lakṣaṇā depend on observation and background knowledge. Neither of them has the epistemic certainty postulation enjoys. I think, due to its observation-independent nature and certainty, postulation can be seen as the source of the knowledge of the truths of reason.


Arthāpatti Inference Abduction Tarka Lakṣaṇā 



Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā by Mukulabhaṭṭa.


Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, 1931–1935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7–8, 1958, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.


Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya by Śrī Harṣa.


The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Tattvacintāmaṇi by Gaṅgeśa.


The Chapter on Arthāpatti, Ślokavārttika by Kumārilabhaṭṭa.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avasthi, B., & Avasthi, I. (1977). Abhidhāvṛttamātṛkā. Delhi: Indu Prakashan.Google Scholar
  2. Bhaṭṭācārya, S. (2000). Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādyam of Śrī Harṣa (Pramātva-khaṇḍanam). Kolkata: Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture.Google Scholar
  3. Das, N. (2011). Lakṣaṇā as inference. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 39(4–5), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasgupta, S. N. (1952). A history of Indian philosophy (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dvivedi, R. (1973). Abhidhāvṛttimātṛkā of Mukulabhaṭṭa. Vidyābhavan Samskṛta Granthamālā 165. Varanasi.Google Scholar
  6. Granoff, P. (1978). Philosophy and argument in Late Vedānta: Śrī Harṣa’s Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍakhādya. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guha, N. (2008). Arthāpatti: A critical examination. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, XXV(4), 107–133.Google Scholar
  8. Guha, N. (2012a). Tarka as cognitive validator. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(1), 44–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guha, N. (2012b). Lakṣaṇā as a creative function of language. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 40(5), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kang, S. Y. (2010). An inquiry into the definition of tarka in Nyāya tradition and its connotation of negative speculation. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 38(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kapitan, T. (1992). Peirce and the autonomy of abductive reasoning. Erkenntnis, 37, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kasturirangan, R., Guha, N., & Chakravarthi, R. (2011). Indian cognitivism and the phenomenology of conceptualization. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keating, M. (2013). Mukulabhaṭṭa’s defense of Lakṣaṇā: How we use words to mean something else, but not everything else. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(4), 439–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Matilal, B. K. (1986). Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Matilal, B. K. (1998). In J. Ganeri & H. Tiwari (Eds.), The character of logic in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Narasimha, R. (2007). Epistemology and language in Indian astronomy and mathematics. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 35, 521–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sarma, K. V. (Ed.). (1976). Siddhāntadarpaṇam of Nīlakaṇṭhasomayājī with auto-commentary. Hoshiarpur: Panjab University.Google Scholar
  19. Sastri, A. C. (1929). Bṛhatī of Prabhakara Misra with the Ṛjuvimala of Mahamahopadhyaya Salikanatha Misra. Banaras: The Secretary, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.Google Scholar
  20. Sastri, S. K. R. (1971). Ślokavārtika of Kumārila with Tātparya-ṭīkā of Uṃveka Bhaṭṭa. Madras: University of Madras.Google Scholar
  21. Suali, L. (1905). Ṣaḍdarśanasamuccaya of Haribhadra with commentary Tarkarahasyadīpikā. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
  22. Śāstrī, A., & Pansikar, V. L. S. (Eds.). (1982). Brahmasūtra Śāṅkara Bhāṣya with the commentaries Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimala. Varanasi: Krishnadas Acaemy.Google Scholar
  23. Śāstrī, T. (2007). Siddhāntabindu of Madhusūdana Sarasvatī. Banaras: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan.Google Scholar
  24. Śāstrī, T. G. (1917). The Śābdanirṇaya by Prakāśātmayatīndra. Trivandrum Sanskrit Series 53. Trivandrum.Google Scholar
  25. Sharma, B. N. K. (1962). The philosophy of Sri Madhvacharya. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidass.Google Scholar
  26. Tailanga, G. S. (1896). The Nyāyasūtras with Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya. Benares: E. J. Lazarus & Co.Google Scholar
  27. Tarkavagish, K. (1990). Tattvacintāmaṇi of Gaṅgeśa (Vol. II, Part 1). Chaukhamba: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratishthan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fulbright-Nehru Fellow, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations