Advertisement

Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 43, Issue 4–5, pp 511–557 | Cite as

Some Problems Concerning Textual Reuses in the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa, with a Discussion of the Quotation from Saraha’s Dohākośagīti

  • Krishna Del Toso
Article

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to shed light on why the citation taken from Saraha’s Dohākośagīti and occurring in the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa, chapter 7, opens the door to some fundamental reflections concerning the authority and the “nature” of this latter text. On the basis of a historical and doctrinal analysis, here a new interpretation is put forward, according to which the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa should be considered a tenth century CE handbook, written by some unknown Buddhist teacher perhaps as a manual for his lessons. The primary purpose of this teacher seems to have been the discussion—in the light of textual sources compiled up to this time—of the doctrinal and philosophical perspectives contained in the sixth century CE Bhāviveka’s Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā and Tarkajvālā. The Madhyamakaratnapradīpa could have been composed on the basis of notes written down for the benefit of this teacher’s students. Moreover, the analysis of the general style and quotes or references of the text, on the one hand, compared with the passage containing the quote from Saraha, on the other hand, lead us to take seriously into consideration the possibility that the citation borrowed from the Dohākośagīti could have been embedded into the text a little after its composition, by someone different from its original author.

Keywords

Bhāviveka/Bhavya Tibetan translations Madhyamaka Madhyamakaratnapradīpa Saraha Textual reuse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Asaṅga, Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra: Bagchi, Sitansusekhar. 1970. Mahāyāna Sūtrālaṅkāra of Asaṅga, The Mithila Institute, Darbhanga.Google Scholar
  2. Bhāviveka, Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā: dBu ma’i sñiṅ po’i tshig le’ur byas pa (D, bsTan-’gyur, dBu-ma, DZa, 1a1-40b7).Google Scholar
  3. Bhāviveka, Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā: Lindtner, Christian. 2001. Madhyamakahṛdayam of Bhavya, The Adyar Library and Research Center, Chennai.Google Scholar
  4. Bhāviveka, Madhyamakaratnapradīpa: dBu ma rin po che’i sgron ma (D, bsTan-’gyur, dBu-ma, TSHa, 259b3-289a7).Google Scholar
  5. Bhāviveka, Tarkajvālā: dBu ma’i sñiṅ po’i ’grel ba rTog ge ’bar ba (D, bsTan-’gyur, dBu-ma, DZa, 40b7-329b4).Google Scholar
  6. Bhāviveka, Tarkajvālā: Eckel, Malcolm D. 2008. Bhāviveka and His Buddhist Opponents, Harvard University Press, Cambridge-London [edition and translation of Tarkajvālā, chapters 4 and 5].Google Scholar
  7. Bhāviveka, Tarkajvālā: Heitmann, Annette L. 2004. Nektar der Erkenntnis. Buddhistische Philosophie des 6 Jh.: Bhavyas Tarkajvālā i - iii , 26, Shaker Verlag, Aachen.Google Scholar
  8. lCaṅ-skya Rol-pa’i-rdo-rje, Grub pa’i mtha’i rnam par bźag pa gsal bar bśad pa thub bstan lhun po’i mdzes rgyan: - No name. 1983. A monumental survey of the Buddhist Philosophical Systems by the Second Lcaṅ-skya Rol-pa’i-rdo-rje Reproduced from a Set of Clear Impressions from the Se-ra Smad Grwa-tshaṅ Blocks, Jayyed Press, Ballimaran (Delhi).Google Scholar
  9. Laṅkāvatārasūtra: Vaidya, Paraśurāma L. 1963. Saddharmalaṅkāvatārasūtram, The Mithila Institute, Darbhanga.Google Scholar
  10. Mañjuśrīnāmasaṃgīti: Davidson, Ronald M. 1981. The Litany of Names of Mañjuśrī. Mélanges Chinois et Bouddhiques [Tantric and Taoist Studies in honour of R.A. Stein, vol. 1], 20, 1-69.Google Scholar
  11. Mañjuśrīnāmasaṃgīti: Wayman, Alex. 1999. Chanting the Names of Mañjuśrī. The Mañjuśrī-Nāma-Saṃgīti. Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.Google Scholar
  12. Nāgārjuna, Bhavasaṃkrāntiparikhatā: Aiyaswami Sastri, Natesa. 1938. Bhāvasaṅkranti Sūtra and Nāgārjuna’s Bhāvasaṅkranti Śāstra with the Commentary of Maitreyanātha, Adyar Library, Adyar (Chennai).Google Scholar
  13. Nāgārjuna, Pañcakrama: Isaacson, Harunaga. 2007. Nāgārjuna’s Pañcakrama. On-line edition based on Toru Tomabechi, Etude du Pañcakrama: introduction et traduction annotée, Thèse de doctorat, Faculté des Lettres, Université de Lausanne 2006, with a few corrections by Harunaga Isaacson: http://tantric-studies.org/e-texts/bauddha/PaKra.txt (accessed 05 September 2011).
  14. Nāgārjuna, Pañcakrama: Mimaki, Katsumi and Toru Tomabechi. 1994. Pañcakrama: Sanskrit and Tibetan Texts Critically Edited with Verse Index and Facsimile Edition of the Sanskrit Manuscripts, Centre for East Asian Cultural Studies for UNESCO, Tokyō.Google Scholar
  15. Nāgārjuna, Praṇidhānaviṃśikā: No name. 1999. “sMon lam ñi śu pa”, in bKa’ ma śin tu rgyas pa (vol. 1), Kaḥ thog mkhan po ’jam dbyaṅs, Chendu. 147-150.Google Scholar
  16. Saraha, Dohākośagīti: Bhayani, Harivallabh, C. 1997. Dohā-gīti-kośa of Saraha-pāda and Caryā-gīti-kośa. Restored Text, Sanskrit Chāyā and Translation. Prakrit Text Society, Ahmedabad.Google Scholar
  17. Saraha, Dohākośagīti: Jackson, Roger R. 2004. Tantric Treasures. Three collections of Mystical Verses from Buddhist India, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Subhāṣitasaṃgraha: Bendall, Cecil. 1903. Subhāṣita-Saṃgraha. An Anthology of Extracts from Buddhist Works Compiled by an Unknown Author, to Illustrate the Doctrine of Scholastic and of Mystic (Tāntrik) Buddhism. Le Muséon 4: 375-402.Google Scholar
  19. Vajracchedikā: Vaidya, Paraśurāma L. 1961. Mahāyāna-sūtra-saṁgrahaḥ (part 1), The Mithila Institute, Darbhanga.Google Scholar
  20. Vasubandhu, Abhidharmakośabhāṣya: Śāstrī, Dwārikādās. 1998. The Abhidharmakośa and Bhāṣya of Ācārya Vasubandhu with Sphuṭārthā Commentary of Ācārya Yaśomittra (vol. 2), Bauddha Bharati, Varanasi.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Beresford, B. C. (1979). Āryaśūrya’s aspiration and a meditation on compassion. Library of Tibetan Works and Archives: Dharamsala.Google Scholar
  2. Braitstein, L. E. (2004). Saraha’s adamantine songs: Texts, contexts, translations and traditions of the Great Seal. A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University, Montreal [Introduction only].Google Scholar
  3. Chattopadhyaya, A. (1996). Atīśa and Tibet. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass [reprint].Google Scholar
  4. Eckel, M. D (1992). To see the Buddha. A philosopher's quest for the meaning of emptiness. Princeton, US: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ejima Yasunori 江島惠教. (1980). Madhyamakaratnapradīpa ni tsuite Madhyamakaratnapradīpa について [On the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa], Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū 印度學佛教學研究 [Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies], 28(2), 951–945.Google Scholar
  6. Folkert, K. W. (1993). In J. E. Cort (Ed.), Scripture and community. Collected essays on the Jains. Atlanta: Scholar Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gray, D. B. (2007). The Cakrasamvara Tantra: Its history, interpretation and practice in India and Tibet. Religion Compass, 1(6), 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guenther, H. V. (1973). The royal song of Saraha. A study in the history of Buddhist thought. Berkeley: Shambala Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Krasser, H. (2011a). Bhāviveka, Dharmakīrti and Kumārila. In T. Funayama 徹船山 (Ed.), Chūgoku-Indo syūkyō-shi tokuni bukkyō-shi ni okeru syomotsu no ryūtsū-denpa to jinbutsu-idō no chiiki-tokusei 中国印度宗教史とくに仏教史における書物の流通伝播と人物移動の地域特性 [Regional characteristics of text dissemination and relocation of people in the history of Chinese and Indian religions, with special reference to Buddhism (pp. 193–242)] (A Report of Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B): Project Number 19320010. March, 2011).Google Scholar
  10. Krasser, H. (2011b). How to teach a Buddhist Monk to refute the outsiders. Text-critical remarks on some works by Bhāviveka. Dhiḥ, 51, 49–76.Google Scholar
  11. Lindtner, C. (1980). Apropos Dharmakīrti: Two new works and a new date. Acta Orientalia, 41, 27–37.Google Scholar
  12. Lindtner, C. (1981). Atīśa’s introduction to the two truths and its sources. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 9, 161–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindtner, C. (1982). Adversaria Buddhica. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 26, 167–194.Google Scholar
  14. Lindtner, C. (1984). On Bhavya’s Madhyamakaratnapradīpa. Indologica Taurinensia, 12, 163–184.Google Scholar
  15. Lindtner, C. (1986a). Bhavya’s critique of Yogācāra in the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa, Chapter IV. In B. K. Matilal & R. D. Evans (Eds.), Buddhist logic and epistemology. Studies in the Buddhist analysis of inference and language (pp. 239–263). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Lindtner, C. (1986b). Materials for the study of Bhavya. In E. Kahrs (Ed.), Kalyāṇamitrārāgaṇam. Essays in honour of Nils Simonsson (pp. 179–202). Oslo: Norwegian University Press, The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture.Google Scholar
  17. Mathes, K.-D. (2007). Can sūtra mahāmudrā be justified on the basis of Maitrīpa’s Apratiṣṭhānavāda? In B. Kellner, H. Krasser, H. Lasic, M. T. Much, H. Tauscher (Eds.), Pramāṇakīrti. Papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th birthday (Part 2, Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 70.2, pp. 545–566), Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde.Google Scholar
  18. Miyazaki Izumi 宮崎泉. (2006). Chūkan-hū-tū-ron ni mirareru ‘bdag gis bkod pa rTog ge ’bar ba’ ni tsuite 『中観宝灯論』にみられる「 bdag gis bkod pa rTog ge ’bar ba 」について [On bdag gis bkod pa rTog ge ’bar ba in the Madhyamakaratnapradīpa]. Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū 印度學佛教學研究 [Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies], 55(1), 453–448.Google Scholar
  19. Miyazaki, I. (2007). Atiśa (Dīpaṃkaraśrījñāna)—His philosophy, practice and its sources. The Memoirs of the Toyo Bunko, 65, 61–89.Google Scholar
  20. Nakamura, H. (1987). Indian Buddhism. A survey with bibliographical notes. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  21. Potter, K. H. (2003). Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies: Buddhist philosophy from 350 to 600 A.D. (Vol. IX). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  22. Schaeffer, K. R. (2005). Dreaming the great Brahmin. Tibetan traditions of the Buddhist poet-saint Saraha. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1981). The literature of the Madhyamaka school of philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  24. Seyfort Ruegg, D. (1990). On the authorship of some works ascribed to Bhāviveka/Bhavya. In D. S. Ruegg & L. Schmithausen (Eds.), Panels of the VIIth world Sanskrit conference (Vol. II, pp. 59–71), Earliest Buddhism and Madhyamaka. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Szántó, P.-D. (2012). Selected chapters from the Catuṣpīṭhatantra (1/2): Introductory study with the annotated translation of selected chapters. DPhil Thesis, University of Oxford (unpublished).Google Scholar
  26. Tatz, M. (1987). The life of the Siddha-Philosopher Maitrīgupta. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 107(4), 695–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tatz, M. (1988). Maitrī-pa and Atīśa. Tibetan Studies, 42, 474–481.Google Scholar
  28. Van Schaik, S., & Doney, L. (2007). The prayer, the priest and the Tsenpo: An early Buddhist narrative from Dunhuang. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 30(1–2), 175–217.Google Scholar
  29. Vose, K. A. (2009). Resurrecting Candrakīrti. Disputes in the Tibetan creation of Prāsaṅgika. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Wayman, A. (1998). Study of the Vairocanābhisaṃbodhitantra. In A. Wayman & R. Tajima (Eds.), The enlightenment of Vairocana (pp. 1–205). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  31. Wedemeyer, C. K. (2007). Āryadeva’s lamp that integrates the practices (Caryāmelāpakapradīpa): The gradual path of Vajrayāna Buddhism according to the esoteric community noble tradition. New York: Columbia University Press [Introduction only].Google Scholar
  32. Wedemeyer, C. K. (2010). Cette fraude littéraire ne peut tromper personne: Jo nang Tāranātha and the history of the gSang ’dus ’phags lugs. In M. Kark & H. Lasic (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy and history of Tibet (Proceeding of the eleventh seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Königswinter 2006, pp. 145–174). Andiast: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
  33. Wright, R. (2010). The Guhyasamāja Piṇḍikṛta-sādhana and its context. Prepared as part of the MA Study of Religions, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanistic StudiesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations