Advertisement

Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 247–259 | Cite as

Śālikanātha’s Criticism of Dharmakīrti’s svasaṃvedana Theory

  • Taiken Kyuma
Special Issue
  • 155 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to clarify how Śālikanātha’s epistemology can be distinguished from that of Dharmakīrti, especially in terms of their respective views on cognitive form (ākāra). It has been pointed out that Śālikanātha’s tripuṭī theory and svayaṃprakāśa theory are very close to Dharmakīrti’s epistemology. However, it remains questionable if Śālikanātha, who belongs to the Prābhākara branch of the Mīmāṃsā and is therefore a nirākāravādin, can subscribe to notions that Dharmakīrti developed on the basis of sākāravāda. The present paper concludes that Śālikanātha agrees with Dharmakīrti in assuming that a single cognition consists of three parts; unlike Dharmakīrti, however, Śālikanātha puts emphasis on the difference between these parts, especially between the cognition and its form, on the ground that the cognitive form belongs to the external thing, and not to the cognition (nirākāravāda). In Dharmakīrti’s epistemology, the cognitive form belongs to cognition (sākāravāda); in the ultimate level, there remains no difference between the three parts.

Keywords

Dharmakīrti Śālikanātha ākāra svasaṃvedana tripuṭī svayaṃprakāśa 

General Abbreviations

em.:

emended

n. e.:

not existent

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Primary Sources

  1. ṚV: Ṛjuvimalāpañcikā of Śālikanātha. See B (Bṛhatī).Google Scholar
  2. DAṬ: Jambuvijaya, Muni (Ed.). (2001). Ācārya Rāmacandra and Guṇacandra’s Dravyālaṅkāra. With Autocommentary. Ahmedabad.Google Scholar
  3. NBṬ: Mālvaṇiyā, D. (Ed.). (1971). Paṇḍita Durveka Miśras Dharmottarapradīpa. [Being a subcommentary of Dharmottaras Nyāyabinduṭīkā, a commentary on Dharmakīrtis Nyāyabindu]. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  4. NS: Nyāyasiddhi of Jayapurī Nārāyaṇa Bhaṭṭa. See PrP (EB).Google Scholar
  5. PrP(EC): Sastri, M. (Ed.). (1904). Prakaraṇapañcikā of Śālikanātha, Prakaraṇapañcikā nāma Prabhākaramatānusāri-Mīmāṃsādarśanam. Benares.Google Scholar
  6. PrP(EP): Sastri, V., & Sarma, V. (Eds.). (1866). Prakaraṇapañcikā of Śālikanātha, the Pratyakṣapariccheda of the Pramāṇapārāyaṇa section. The Pandit, 1, 4–7. Benares.Google Scholar
  7. PrP(EB): Sastri, A. (Ed.). (1961). Prakaraṇapañcikā of Sri Śālikanāthamiśra with Nyāya-siddhi. Benares.Google Scholar
  8. PrP(MM): Manuscript of the Pramāṇapārāyaṇa section preserved in Oriental Research Institute Mysore (ORI): C.1538/2, Devanāgarī, paper, incomplete, 57 folios.Google Scholar
  9. PrP(MN): Manuscript of Pramāṇapārājikā (sic; of the whole PrP). Nepal-German Manuscript Preservation Project (NGMPP): B0056/03, Devanāgarī, paper, complete, 164 folios.Google Scholar
  10. PV 3: Pramāṇavārttika of Dharmakīrti, chapter on perception (pratyakṣa). See Tosaki 1979 (vv. 1–319) and Tosaki 1985 (vv. 320–539).Google Scholar
  11. PVin 1: Steinkellner, E. (Ed.). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇaviniścaya. Chapters 1 and 2. Beijing/Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House/Austrian Academy of Sciences Press 2007. For Corrigenda, cf. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens 51 (2007–2008) 207–208, as well as http://ikga.oeaw.ac.at/Mat/steinkellner07_corrigenda.pdf (last accessed 14 January 2009).
  12. PVP: Pramāṇavārttikapañjikā of Devendrabuddhi. Tibetan translation: Tshad ma rnam ‘grel gyi dka’ ‘grel, translated by Subhūtiśrī(śānti) and (rMa) dGe ba’i blo gros. D 4217, Che 1b1-326b4; P 5717, Che 1-390a8.Google Scholar
  13. B: Sastri, S. K. R. (Ed.). (1934). Bṛhatī of Prabhākara Miśra with the Ṛjuvimalāpañcikā of Śālikanātha [Tarkapāda]. Madras.Google Scholar
  14. MBhP: Sastri, S. K. R. (Ed.). (1936). Bṛhatī of Prabhākara Miśra with the Bhāśyapariśiṣṭa of Śālikanātha [Tarkapāda]. Madras.Google Scholar
  15. ŚBh: Frauwallner, E. (Ed.). (1968). Śabarasvāmi’s Bhāṣyam zu den Mīmāṃsāsūtren I.1,1–5. In E. Frauwallner, Materialien zur ältesten Erkenntnislehre der Karmamīmāṃsā (pp. 7–61). Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bandyopadhyay, N. (2003). Definition of pramāṇa (Pramāṇapārāyanṇa in the Prakaraṇapañcikā). Kolkata.Google Scholar
  2. Chatterjee T. (1979) Did Prabhākara hold the view that knowledge is self-manifesting?. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 7(3): 267–276Google Scholar
  3. Hiriyanna, M. (1972). Indian philosophical studies II. Mysore.Google Scholar
  4. Iwata T. (1991) Sahopalambhaniyama. Struktur und Entwicklung des Schlusses von der Tatsache, daß Erkenntnis und Gegenstand ausschließlich zusammen wahrgenommen werden, auf deren Nicht verschiedenheit (Vol. 2). Franz Steiner, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  5. Jha, M. G. (1911). The Prābhākara school of Pūrva Mīmāṃsā. Delhi (reprint 1978).Google Scholar
  6. Kuroda H. (1982) Prakaraṇapañcikā kenkyū (III) Śālikanātha no ninshikiron no ichisokumen. Indogakubukkyōgaku kenkyū, 31(1): 38–40Google Scholar
  7. Kuroda H. (1989) Kyū-Prabhākara ha ni tsuite. Indo shisōshi kenkyū, 6: 77–94Google Scholar
  8. Matilal B.K. (1986) Perception. An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Pandurangi, K. T. (2004). Prakaraṇapañcikā of Śālikanātha with an exposition in English. New Delhi.Google Scholar
  10. Shastri N. (1967) Cognition (Jñāna) according to Prabhākara Miśra. Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal, 5: 71–76Google Scholar
  11. Taber J. (2005) A Hindu critique of Buddhist Epistemology. Kumārila on perception. The “Determination of Perception” chapter of Kumārila Bhaṭṭa’s Ślokavārttika. Translation and Commentary. London/New York, RoutledgeCurzonGoogle Scholar
  12. Tosaki, H. (1979). Bukkyōninshikiron no kenkyū. Jōkan {*Studies in Buddhist Epistemology, Vol. 1}. Tōkyō: Daitōshuppansha.Google Scholar
  13. Tosaki, H. (1985). Bukkyōninshikiron no kenkyū. Gekan {*Studies in Buddhist Epistemology, Vol. 2}. Tōkyō: Daitōshuppansha.Google Scholar
  14. Yoshimizu K. (1997) Der Organismus des urheberlosen Veda. Eine Studie der Niyoga-Lehre Prabhākaras mit ausgewählten Übersetzungen der Bṛhatī. Publications of the De Nobili Research Library, WienGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities, Law and EconomicsMie UniversityTsu-shi, Mie-kenJapan

Personalised recommendations