Abstract
In the svārthānumāna chapter of his Pramāṇavārttika, the Buddhist philosopher Dharmakīrti presented a defense of his claim that legitimate inference must rest on a metaphysical basis if it is to be immune from the risks ordinarily involved in inducing general principles from a finite number of observations. Even if one repeatedly observes that x occurs with y and never observes y in the absence of x, there is no guarantee, on the basis of observation alone, that one will never observe y in the absence of x at some point in the future. To provide such a guarantee, claims Dharmakīrti, one must know that there is a causal connection between x and y such that there is no possibility of y occurring in the absence of x. In the course of defending this central claim, Dharmakīrti ponders how one can know that there is a causal relationship of the kind necessary to guarantee a proposition of the form “Every y occurs with an x.” He also dismisses an interpretation of his predecessor Dignāga whereby Dignāga would be claiming non-observation of y in the absence of x is sufficient to warrant to the claim that no y occurs without x. The present article consists of a translation of kārikās 11–38 of Pramānavārttikam, svārthānumānaparicchedaḥ along with Dharmakīrti’s own prose commentary. The translators have also provided an English commentary, which includes a detailed introduction to the central issues in the translated text and their history in the literature before Dharmakīrti.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cardona, G. (1967–1968). Anvaya and vyatireka in Indian grammar. Adyar Library Bulletin, 31–32; 313–352
Dunne J. (1996). Thoughtless Buddha, Passionate Buddha. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 64, 525–556
Dunne, J. D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy, Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Gillon, B. S. (2007). Dharmakīrti on inference from effect: A discussion of verse 12 and the svavṛtti of the Svārthānumāna chapter of the Pramāṇavārttika. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Dharmakīrti Conference, Vienna, August 23–27, 2005. Vienna, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Hayes R.P. (1980). Diṅnāga’s views on reasoning (svārthānumāna). Journal of Indian Philosophy, 8, 219–277
Hayes R.P. (1988). Dignāga on the interpretation of signs. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes R.P., Gillon B.S. (1991). Introduction to Dharmakīrti’s theory of inference as presented in Pramāṇavārttika svopajñavṛtti 1–10. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 19, 1–73
Inami, M. (1999). On the determination of causality. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy, No. 32 in Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 131–154. Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference, Hiroshima, 4–6 November, 1997.
Katsura, S. (1986a). Indo ronrigaku ni okeru henjū-gainen no seisei to hatten: Charakasanhitā kara Darumakīruti made, Hiroshima Daigaku Bungaku-bu Kiyō, 45. Special edition 1. Hiroshima: Hiroshima Daigaku Bungaku-bu. The origin and development of the concept of Vyāpti in Indian logic: From the Carakasaṃhitā up to Dharmakīrti. (in Japanese with English abstract pp. 120–122).
Katsura, S. (1986b). Trairūpya formulae. In Buddhism and its relation to other religions: Essays in honour of Dr. Shozen Kumoi on his seventieth birthday. [s.l: s.n], pp. 161–172.
Katsura S. (1992). Dignāga and Dharmakīrti on adarśanamātra and anupalabdhi. Asiatische Studien/É tudes Asiatiques, 46(1): 222–231
Katsura, S. (1996). How did the Buddhists prove something? The nature of Buddhist logic. The Numata Yehan Lecture in Buddhism. Calgary: The University of Calgary.
Katsura, S. (2000). Dignāga on trairūpya reconsidered: A reply to Prof. Oetke. In A. Akamatsu (Ed.), Indo no bunka to ronri. Tosaki Hiromasu hakase koki kinen ronbunshū [Culture and logic in India. A felicitation volume for Prof. H. Tosaki on his seventieth birthday]. Fukuoka: Kyūshū Daigaku.
Katsura, S. (2004). The role of dṛṣṭānta in Dignāga’s logic. In S. Katsura, & E. Steinkellner (Eds.), The role of the example (dṛṣṭānta) in classical Indian logic, Vol. 58 of Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde (pp. 135–173). Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universitä t Wien.
Lasic, H. (1999). Dharmakirti and his successors on the determination of causality. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy, Vol. 32 of Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens (pp. 233–242). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference (Hiroshima, 4–6 November, 1997).
Mill J.S. (1843). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. London, England, J. W. Parker
Mill J.S. (1865). An examination of Sir William Hamilton’s philosophy and of the principal philosophical questions discussed in his writings. Bosto: W. V. Spencer
Oetke, C. (1994). Studies on the doctrine of Trairūpya, Vol. 33 of Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universitä t Wien.
Ono, M. (1999). Dharmakīrti on asādhāraṇānaikāntika. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy, No. 32 in Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Proceedings of the Third International Dharmakīrti Conference (Hiroshima, 4–6 November, 1997.
Steinkellner E. (1966). Bemerkungen zu Īśvarasenas Lehre vom Grund. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 10, 73–85
Steinkellner, E. (1988). Remarks on niścitagrahaṇa. In R. Gnoli, & L. Lanciotti (Eds.), Orientalia Iosephi Tucci Memoriae Dicata, Vol. 56 of Serie Orientale Roma (pp. 1427–1444). Rome: Istituto Italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
Steinkellner, E. (1993). Buddhist logic: The search for certainty. In T. Yoshinori, J. V. Bragt, J. W. Seisig, J. S. O’Leary, & P. L. Swanson (Eds.), Buddhist spirituality: Indian, Southeast Asian, Tibetan, and Early Chinese (pp. 312–318). New York, New York: Crossroad.
Steinkellner, E. (1997). Kumārila, Īśvarasena, Dharmakīrti in Dialogue. A New Interpretation of Pramāṇavārttika I 33. In P. Kieffer-Pulz, & J.-U. Hartmann (Eds.), Bauddhavidyāsudhākaraḥ: Studies in honour of Heinz Bechert on the occasion of his 65th birthday, Monographien zu den Sprachen und Literaturen des indo-tibetischen Kulturraumes: v. 30. Swisttal-Odendorf, Austria: Indica et Tibetica Verlag, pp. 625–646.
Steinkellner, E. (2004). The early Dharmakīrti on the purpose of examples. In S. Katsura, & E. Steinkellner (Eds.), The role of the example (dṛṣṭānta) in classical Indian logic, Vol. 58 of Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde (pp. 225–250). Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Tillemans T.J.F. (1990). On sapakṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 18, 53–79
Tillemans, T. J. F. (2004). Inductiveness, deductiveness and examples in Buddhist logic. In S. Katsura, & E. Steinkellner (Eds.), The role of the example (dṛṣṭānta) in classical Indian logic, Vol. 58 of Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde (pp. 251–275). Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gillon, B.S., Hayes, R.P. Dharmakīrti on the role of causation in inference as presented in Pramāṇavārttika Svopajñavṛtti 11–38. J Indian Philos 36, 335–404 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9034-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-008-9034-z