With mathematics education dominated by practices of standardized test alignment, the quest for mathematical understanding is adrift despite so much talk about the importance of STEM subject matters. To add to the confusion there has long been worries among educators about any curricular programs or instructional practices that can be labeled indoctrinative. The worse combination of practices seems afoot. Standardized testing has led to unmitigated indoctrination throughout much of public education yet the term is indoctrination is shunned as bad pedagogy. The argument here is that entry into any new discipline from times of antiquity to the present necessarily involves responsible and warranted indoctrination. Acknowledging the fruitful role of indoctrination early on should enable educators to benchmark when the practice has become excessive or otherwise inappropriate. Threshold moments demarcate between early instruction enabling the study of math from advanced and independent study wherein students’ development skills of reflection and evaluative deliberation relevant to mathematic thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aczel, A. (2015). Finding zero: A mathematician’s odessy to find the origin of numbers. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Adkins, P. (2004). Galileo’s finger: The ten great ideas of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, A. (2014). The infinitesimals: How a dangerous mathematical theory shaped the modern world. London: Oneworld Pub.
Artstein, Z. (2014). Mathematics and the real world: The remarkable role of evolution in the making of mathematics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.
Bailey, R. (2010). Indoctrination. In R. Bailey, R. Barrow, & D. Carr (Eds.), Sage handbook of philosophy of education. London: Sage.
Balter, M. (1998). Why settle down? The mystery of communities. Science, 20, 1442–1446.
Bartha, P. (2010). By parallel reasoning: The construction and evaluation of analogical arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bradford, G. (2015). Achievement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Boesch, C., & Tomasella, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures. Current Anthropology, 39, 591–614.
Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
Butterworth, B., & Kovas, Y. (2013). Understanding neurocognitive developmental disorders can improve education for all. Science, 340, 300–305.
Callan, E., & Arena, D. (2009). Indoctrination. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Distinguishing between understanding and belief. Theory Into Practice, 40(4), 235–241.
Chomsky, N., & Robichaud, A. (2014). Standardized testing as an assault on humanism and critical thinking in education. Radical Pedagogy, 11(1), 54–66.
Cobb, M. (2020). The idea of the brain: The future of neuroscience. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Cook, M. (2020). Sleight of mind: 75 ingenius paradoxes in mathematics, physics and philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Crow, M. (1988). Ten misconceptions about mathematics and its history. In W. Aspray & P. Kitcher (Eds.), History and philosophy of modern Mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2006). Social learning and cognition: The case for pedagogy. In Y. Munkata & M. Johnson (Eds.), Processes in brain and cognitive development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curry, A. (2008). Seeking the roots of ritual. Science, 319, 278–280.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2007) Evaluating “no child left behind.” The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/evaluating-no-child-left-behind
D’Agostino, S. (2020). How to free your inner mathematician. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dedekind, R. (1888). Was sind und was sollen die Zablen Braunsch-weig. Viewig: P.III.
DeFelipe, J. (2011). The evolution of the brain, and human nature of cortical circuits, and intellectual creativity. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 5, 1–17.
Dehaene, S. (2011). How the mind creates numbers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2020). How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine. New York, NY: Viking.
Diaconis, P., & Skyrms, B. (2018). Ten great ideas about chance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dreyfus, H., & Taylor, C. (2015). Retrieving realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elgin, C. Z. (2017). True enough. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ellenberg, J. (2014). How not to be wrong: The power of mathematical thinking. New York: Penguin Press.
Erwig, M. (2017). Once upon an algorithm. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Feferman, A., & Feferman, S. (2008). Alfred Tarski: Life and logic. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Feynman, R. (1985). Surely you are joking Mr. Feynman. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Fortnoy, L. (2013). The golden ticket. P, NP and the search for the impossible. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R., & Cordes, S. (2006). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In S. C. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.), Evolution and culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gatchel. (1972). The evolution of a concept. In I. Snook (Ed.), Concepts of indoctrination (pp. 2–22). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risk: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Glimcher, P. (2003). Decisions: Uncertainty and the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldstein, R. (2005). Incompleteness: The proof and paradox of Kurt Godel. New York: W. W. Norton.
Gopnik, A., Meltzkoff, M. A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York: William Morrow Co.
Gopnik, A., & Graf, P. (1988). Knowing how you know: Young children’s ability to identify and remember the sources of their beliefs. Child Development, 59(5), 1366–1371.
Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306(5695), 496–499.
Graham, L., & Kantor, J. (2009). Naming infinity: A true story of religious mysticism and mathematical curiosity. Cambridge, MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard.
Gray, J. (2008). Plato’s ghost: The modernist transformation of mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Greene, T. F. (1972). Philosophical essays. In I. A. Snook (Ed.), Concepts of indoctrination (pp. 32–45). New York, NY: Routledge.
Hacker, A. (2016). The math myth: And other STEM delusions. New York, NY: New Press.
Hand, D. (2014). The improbability principle. New York: Scientific American/Farrar, Straus & Giroux Press.
Harris, M. (2015). Mathematics without apologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Harvey, C. W. (2004). Liberal indoctrination and the problem of the community. Synthese, 111(1), 15–16.
Hornstein, L. (2011). The Tarskian turn: Deflationism and the axiomatic turn. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Ifrah, G. (1985). From one to zero: A universal history of numbers. New York, NY: Viking.
Kjeldsen, T., et al. (2014). The role of history and philosophy in university mathematics education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 837–871). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M., Petrill, S. A., & Plomin, R. (2007). Mathematical ability of 10-year old boys and girls. Journal of Learning Disabilities., 40, 554–567.
Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Landsman, J., & Gorski, P. (2007). Countering standardization. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 40–44.
Levitin, J. (2014). The organized mind. New York: Dutton.
Lewis-Williams, D., & Pearce, D. (2005). Inside the neolithic mind. London: Thames and Hudson.
Lockhart, P. (2017). Arithmetic. Cambridge, MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard.
Lyons, I. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence. Cognition, 121(2), 256–261.
Mankiewicz, R. (2000). The story of mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maor, E. (1991). To infinity and beyond: A cultural history of the infinite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Massey, D. (2002). A brief history of human society. American Sociological Review, 67, 1–29.
Mazur, J. (2005). Euclid in the forest; discovering universal truth in logic and math. New York, NY: Pi Press.
Mazur, J. (2016). Fluke: The math and myth of coincidence. New York: Basic Books.
Mlodinow, L. (2015). The upright thinkers: The human journey from living in trees to understanding the cosmos. New York: Pantheon.
Morris, I., & Macerdo, S. (2015). Foragers, farmers and fossil fuels: How human values evolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nichols, S., Glass, G., & Berliner, D. (2012). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Updated analyses with NAEP data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(20), 1–30.
Nieder, A. (2019). A brain for numbers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). New conception of thinking from ontology to education. Educational Psychologist, 28, 67–85.
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Exact and approximate; arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306(5695), 499–503.
Posamentier, A. S. (2020). The joy of geometry. New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
Poundstone, W. (1988). The labyrinths of reason: Paradoxes, puzzles, and the frailty of knowledge. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Putnam, H. (2015a). Naturalism, realism and normativity. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 1(2), 312–328.
Putnam, H. (2015b). Intellectual autobiography of Hilary Putnam. In R. Auxier, D. Anderson, & L. Hahn (Eds.), The philosophy of Hilary Putnam. Chicago: Open Court.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Rowlands, S. (2014). Philosophy and the secondary school mathematics classroom. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 705–730). Dordrecht: Springer.
Secolsky, C., Judd, T., Magaram, E., Levy, S., Kossar, B., & Reese, G. (2016). Using think-aloud protocols to uncover misconceptions and improve developmental math instruction: An exploratory study. Numeracy, 9(1), 6.
Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. New York: Routledge.
Siegel, H. (1989). Relativism refuted: A critical of contemporary epistemological relativism. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 40(3), 419–427.
Siegel, H., & Smith, M. U. (2019). Must evolutionary education that aims at belief be indoctrinating. Science and Education, 28(9–10), 1235–1247.
Sigman, M. (2017). The secret life of the mind. New York, NY: Little, Brown & Co.
Smith, G. (2014). Standard deviation: Flawed assumptions tortured data and other ways to lie with statistics. London: Overlook Duckworth.
Snook, I. A. (1970). The concept of education. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 7, 65–108.
Snook, I. A. (Ed.). (1972). Concepts of indoctrination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Sober, E. (2015). Ockham’s razors: A user’s manual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sokal, A. (2009). Beyond the hoax: Science, philosophy and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soni, J., & Goodman, R. (2017). A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon invented the information age. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sosa, E. (2011). Reflective knowledge: Apt belief and rational knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, B., Macomber, J., & Jacobson, K. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 605–632.
Stewart, I. (2013). Visions of infinity. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Strogatz, S. (2019). Infinite powers: The calculus reveals the secrets of the universe. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Su, F. (2020). Mathematics for human flourishing. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Tammet, D. (2012). Thinking in numbers: How maths illuminates our lives. UK: Hoddei & Stoughton.
Tomasella, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tversky, B. (2019). Mind in motion. How action shapes thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Wagner, P. (1982). The philosopher as teacher: Philosophy in mathematics education. Metaphilosophy, 13(1), 79–90.
Wagner, P. (1986). Philosophical praxis. Teaching Philosophy, 9(4), 291–299.
Wagner, P. (1990). Will education contain fewer surprises for students in the future? In V. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Recent research from the harvard philosophy of education research center (pp. 176–211). New York: Routledge.
Wagner, P. (2006). Probability, decision theory, and a curricular approach to developing critical thinking. Journal of Thought, 42(2), 23–38.
Wagner, P. (2011). Isolationism and the possibility of truth. Interchange, 42(4), 389–408.
Wagner, P. (2017). Warranted indoctrination in science education. In M. Matthews (Ed.), Handbook in History and philosophy of science education. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer.
Wagner, P., & Dede, C. (1983). Disciplinary paradigm shifts: A new frontier for future research. World Futures Bulletin, 17(2), 25–29.
Wagner, P., Johnson, D., Fair, F., & Fasko, D. (2017). Focus on thinking. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wagner, P., Johnson, D., Fair, F., & Fasko, D. (2018). Thinking ahead. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wagner, P., & Lopez, G. (2010). The great conversation and the ethics of inclusion. Multicultural Perspectives, 12(3), 167–172.
Wagner, P. A., & Fair, F. (2020). Education for knowing: Theories of knowledge for effective student building. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefiled.
Wang, H. (1987). Reflections on Kurt Godel. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Wheeler, M., & Feghali, I. (1983). Much ado about nothing: Preservice elementary school teachers’ concept of zero. Journal of Research in Math Education, 14, 147–155.
Wiley, R. (2015). Noise matters: The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1975). In C. Diamond (Ed.), Lectures in the foundations of mathematics. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Yau, S. (2020). The shape of a life: One mathematician’s struggle for the universe’s hidden geometry. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Zellini, P. (2020). The mathematics of the gods and the algorithms of men: A cultural history. New York, NY: Pegasus.
Conflict of Interest
Author declare that they have no potential conflict of interest to disclose.
All ethics standards followed.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, P.A. The Methods, Benefits and Limitations of Indoctrination in Mathematics Education. Interchange 52, 41–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09415-7
- Mathematical understanding
- Disciplinary thresholds
- Ritualized signaling