Abstract
This research attempts to explore the implications of Bill C-45: The Cannabis Act and how this could influence educational policy in schools. The researchers sought the perspectives of multiple stakeholders involved in education, specifically their views on mitigating the transition, and other topics such as attitudes towards policy change, drug testing, and the impacts on students and teachers. This research includes components of qualitative research, statistical analysis, and review of academic literature and policy. The qualitative research portion was undertaken through in-person interviews with three teachers, four principals, and a board of education trustee in a large city in Western Canada. The statistical analysis portion of the investigation was conducted through a survey distributed to a sample of 384 people of the general public over the age of 18. This article focuses on three of the five predominate themes found in the research: (i) sustainable approaches to educating stakeholders about cannabis following legalization, (ii) comparison of views for and against drug testing between educators and the general public, and (iii) the nature of consumption does matter. There will inevitably be countless implications to follow based upon this political shift in Canada that will directly and indirectly affect stakeholders in education. Findings addressing these perceived impacts and considerations can help educational professionals mitigate the possible negative consequences of Bill C-45.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberta Teachers’ Association. (2004). The ATA Code of professional conduct. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/ATA/Publications/Teachers-as-Professionals/IM-4E%20Code%20of%20Professional%20Conduct.pdf.
Bill C-45. (2017). An act respecting cannabis and to amend the controlled drugs and substances act, the criminal code and other acts. First Reading Apr. 13, 2017, 42nd Parliament, 1st session. Retrieved from the Parliament of Canada website: http://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/C-45/first-reading.
Davis, B. (2007). Proposed policy: Drug testing of Hawaii’s public school teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(6), 283–286. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3200/TCHS.80.6.283-286.
Evans-Whipp, T., Plenty, S., Catalano, R., Herrenkohl, T., & Toumbourou, J. (2015). Longitudinal effects of school drug policies on student marijuana use in Washington State and Victoria, Australia. American Journal of Public Health,105(5), 994–1000.
Himi, H., & Bonny-Noach, H. (2018). Personal and professional attitudes and behavioral patterns concerning cannabis use of teachers and youth workers in Israel. Journal of Drug Issues, 48(1), 67–77. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/doi/10.1177/0022042617729677.
Human Resources Professionals Association. (2018). Clearing the haze: The impacts of marijuana in the workplace. Retrieved from https://www.hrpa.ca/Documents/Public/HRPA-Clearing-The-Haze.pdf.
InsightsWest. (2018). Firefighters and nurses top list of Canada’s respected professionals. Retrieved from https://insightswest.com/news/firefighters-and-nurses-top-list-of-canadas-respected-professionals/.
Levy, S., & Schizer, M. (2015). Adolescent drug testing policies in schools. Pediatrics,135(4), E1107–E1112. Retrieved from https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/135/4/e1107.full.pdf.
Norland, S., DiChiara, A., & Hendershott, A. (1995). Teachers’ use of and perceptions of a drug curriculum. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education,40(2), 100–111.
Porath-Waller, A., Beasley, E., & Beirness, D. (2010). A meta-analytic review of school-based prevention for cannabis use. Health Education & Behavior,37(5), 709–723.
Robinson, M. (2018). Here’s where you can legally smoke marijuana in 2018. Business Insider. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/where-can-you-can-legally-smoke-weed-2018-1.
Statistics Canada. (2018). Cannabis in Canada: Market data. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/licensed-producers/market-data.html.
Sturgess, C. (2018). Do marijuana use and externalizing behaviours mediate the association between academic aptitude and academic performance? Unpublished Master of Science Thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC.
Funding
This study was funded by a Werklund School of Education Undergraduate Research Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
J. Daniel Walsh declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Darren E. Lund declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution through the Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board, certificate number REB18-0767.
Research Involving Animal and Human Participants
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by either of the authors.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, J.D., Lund, D.E. Implications of the Legalization of Marijuana in Canada Affecting Educational Policy. Interchange 50, 501–515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09372-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-019-09372-2