, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 73–83 | Cite as

Emotion and Rhythm in Critical Learning Incidents

  • Hannu Soini
  • Mark Flynn


In this paper, we analyzed the descriptions of learning provided by 234 College of Education students from Finland and Canada and compared them with Whitehead’s (1932/1962) epistemological theory of the rhythm of mental growth. The students were asked to “Give a concrete example of a situation in which you really learned something.” The descriptions of learning provided by the students were analyzed using a constant comparative method. This analysis resulted in the identification of six primary aspects of learning: emotional significance, reflection, differing perspectives, collaboration, autonomy, and dialogue. When examined in the context of student descriptions, the aspects of learning seemed to occur in rhythmic patterns. These findings led us to conclude that Whitehead’s theory of mental growth has merit and could inform new theories of learning that take into account human aesthetic experience.


Qualitative methods critical incidents rhythm of mental growth freedom discipline aesthetic aspects of learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brookfield, S.D. (1994). Using critical incidents to explore learners’ assumptions. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 177–193). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Flynn, M. (1995). Conflicting views on the importance of emotion to human development and growth: Piaget and Whitehead. Interchange, 26(4), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flynn, M. (2000). A critique of scientism not science per se. Interchange, 31(1), 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flynn, M. (2003). Putting the psyche back in psychology. Process Papers, 7, 12–21.Google Scholar
  7. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Holtzkamph, K. (1991). Was heisst “psychologie vom subjektstandpunkt?” Ueberlegungen zu subjektwissenschaftlicher theoriebildung (What is “psychology from the subject’s point of view?” Reflections on subject–scientific theory building). Forum Kritische Psychologie, 28, 5–19.Google Scholar
  9. Jarvilehto, T. (1998a). The theory of the organism–environment system: I. Description of the theory. Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science, 33, 317–330.Google Scholar
  10. Jarvilehto, T. (1998b). The theory of the organism–environment system: II. Significance of nervous activity in the organism–environment system. Integrative Physiological and Behavioural Science, 33, 331–338.Google Scholar
  11. Soini, H. (1999). Education students experiences of learning and their conceptions about learning disabilities: Towards a comprehensive theory of learning. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis: Scientiae Rerum Socialium, E (40). Oulu, Finland: Oulu University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Whitehead, A.N. (1962). The aims of education and other essays. London: Ernest Benn. (Original work published 1932)Google Scholar
  13. Whitehead, A.N. (1967). Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1925)Google Scholar
  14. Whitehead, A.N. (1978). Process and reality. London: Free Press. (Original published 1929)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations