Advertisement

International Applied Mechanics

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 670–681 | Cite as

Method of Deployment of a Tethered Space System Along the Local Vertical

  • A. E. Zakrzhevskii
Article

Two bodies coupled by an elastic weightless tether in space are considered. A fundamentally new approach to solving the problem of the deployment of a tethered space system along the local vertical in a circular orbit is formulated and theoretically substantiated. This approach is based on the change-of-angular-momentum theorem. It allows programming a tether length control law that purposefully changes the angular momentum of the tether under the gravitational moment until the deployed tether is aligned with the local vertical. The deployment of a specific tether is considered as an example to demonstrate the simplicity of the approach and the way of verification of the mathematical model

Keywords

flexible space tether new method of deployment model verification numerical simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    E. M. Levin, “Deployment of a long tether in orbit,” Kosm. Issled., 21, No. 1, 678–688 (1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. E. Tsiolkovsky, “Free space,” in: Collected Works [in Russian], Vol. 2, Izd.ANSSSR, Moscow (1954), pp. 26–68.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. E. Tsiolkovsky, Way to Stars (Collected Works) [in Russian], Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow (1960).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Akbarzade and A. Farshidianfar, “Application of the amplitude–frequency formulation to a nonlinear vibration system typified by a mass attached to a stretched wire,” Int. Appl. Mech., 50, No. 4, 476–483 (2014).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. V. Beletsky, Motion of an Artificial Satellite About its Center of Mass, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Barkow, “Controlled deployment of a tethered satellite system,” Proc. Appl. Math. Mech., No. 2, 224–225 (2003).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Barkow, A. Steindl, H. Troger, and G. Wiedermann, “Various methods of controlling the deployment of a tethered satellite,” J. Vibr. Control, No. 9, 187–208 (2003).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Bekey, “Tethers open new space options,” Astronautics and Aeronautics, 21, No. 4, 32–40 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Bekey and P. A. Penzo, “Tether propulsion,” Aerospace America, 24, No. 7, 40–43 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Beletsky and E. M. Levin, “Dynamics of space tether systems,” Adv. Astronaut. Sci. (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. J. Cantafio, V. A. Chobotov, and M. G. Wolfe, “Photovoltaic gravitationaly stabilised, solid-state satellite solar power station,” J. Energy, 1, No. 6, 352–363 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. A. Chobotov, “Gravitational excitation of an extensible dumbell satellite,” J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 4, No. 10, 1295–1300 (1967).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. P. Hoyt and Ch. Uphoff, “Cislunar tether transport system,” J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 37, No. 2, 1–15 (2000).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. R. Kroll, “Tethered propellant resupply technique for space stations,” Acta Astronautica, 12, No. 12, 987–994 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. M. Levin, Dynamic Analysis of Space Tether Missions, Univelt, San Diego (2007).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. C. Lorenzini et al., “Acceleration levels on board the space station and a tethered elevator for micro- and variable-gravity applications,” in: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Space Tethers for Science in the Space Station Era (Venice, Italy, October 4–8, 1987), A89-43326 18-12, Bologna, Societa Italiana di Fisica (1988), pp. 513–522.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Lur’e, Analytical Mechanics, Springer, Heidelberg (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Menon, M. Kruijff, and A. Vavouliotis, “Design and testing of a space mechanism for tether deployment,” J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 44, No. 4, 927–939 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. J. Modi and A. K. Misra, “Deployment dynamics of tethered satellite systems,” AIAA Paper, No. 1398, 10 (1978).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L. G. Napolitano and F. Bevilacqua, “Tethered constellations, their utilization as microgravity platforms and relevant features,” in: 35th Int. Astronautical Congr. (October 7–13, 1984), Lausanne, Switzerland (1984), pp. 84–439.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. A. Padgett and A. P. Mazzoleni, “Analysis and design for nospin tethered satellite retrieval,” J. Guidance Contr. Dyn., 30, No. 5, 1516–1519 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. Pearson, “Anchored lunar satellites for cislunar transportation and communication,” J. Astron. Sci., 17, No. 1, 39–62 (1979).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. C. Rupp and R. R. Kissel, Tetherline System for Orbiting Satellites, U. S. Patent No. 4083520, Int. Cl. B. 64 G 1/100, US Cl. 244/167; 244/161, April II (1978).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C. C. Rupp and J. H. Laue, “Shuttle/tethered satellite system,” J. Astronaut. Sci., 26, No. 1, 1–17 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    W. Steiner, &. Steindl, and H. Troger, “Center manifold approach to the control of a tethered satellite system,” Appl. Math. Comp., 70, 315–327 (1995).CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Steindl, W. Steiner, and H. Troger, “Optimal control of retrieval of a tethered subsatellite,” Solid Mech. Appl., 122, 441–450 (2005).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Steindl and H. Troger, “Optimal control of deployment of a tethered subsatellite,” Nonlin. Dynam., 31, 257–274 (2003).CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. J. Swet, Method for Deployment and Stabilising Orbiting Structures, U.S. Patent Office No. 3532298, Int. Cl. B 64 G 1/00, U.S. Cl. 244-1, October 6 (1970).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    G. Wiedermann, M. Schagerl, A. Steindl, and H. Troger, “Computation of force controlled deployment and retrieval of a tethered satellite by the finite element method,” in: ECCM ‘99 European Conf. on Computational Mechanics, Munchen, Germany, August 31–September 3 (1999), pp. 410–429.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Williams, “Application of pseudospectral methods for receding horizon control,” J. Guidance, Contr. Dyn., 27, No. 2, 310–314 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Williams and P. Trivailo, “On the optimal deployment and retrieval of tethered satellites,” in: 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf. and Exhibit, Tucson, July 10–13 (2005), pp. 157–163.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Williams, “Libration control of tethered satellites in elliptical orbits,” J. Spacecraft and Rockets, 43, No. 2, 476–479 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. E. Zakrzhevskii and V. S. Khoroshilov, “Dynamics of an unstabilized spacecraft during the deployment of an elastic pantograph structure,” Int. Appl. Mech., 50, No. 3, 341–351 (2014).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S. P. Timoshenko Institute of MechanicsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations