Advertisement

Performance of Punctured Convolutional Codes in A-CDMA Systems with Accurately Modelled Multiple Access Interference Under Perfect Phase Tracking Conditions

  • J. K. Thejeswi
  • Vidhyacharan Bhaskar
Article

Abstract

In this paper, a simplified expression for Improved Gaussian Approximation is considered to model multiple access interference in an A-CDMA system. Punctured convolutional codes, which are one of the subclasses of convolutional codes, are employed to provide error protection to the information transmitted over the wireless channel. A detailed theoretical analysis is made initially and then compared with the simulated results for various code rates. The simulated performance of the codes is then compared for different power levels and different number of interferers of the desired user. A perfect phase reference is assumed to be available for the information signal of the desired user throughout this paper.

Keywords

Punctured convolutional codes Maximum likelihood decoding Asynchronous Code Division Multiple Access system Multi User Interference Perfect phase tracking Improved Gaussian Approximation 

References

  1. 1.
    V. Bhaskar and L. Joiner, Performance of punctured convolutional codes in asynchronous CDMA communications under perfect phase tracking conditions, Elsevier Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering, Vol. 30, pp. 573–592, 2004.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Bensley and B. Aazhang, Maximum likelihood synchronization of a single user for code-division multiple access communication systems, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 392–399, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Morrow and J. Lehnert, Bit-to-bit error dependence in slotted DS/SSMA packet systems with random signature sequences, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 1052–1061, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Holtzmann, A simple, accurate method to calculate spread-spectrum multiple access error probabilities, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 461–464, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Cheng and J. M. Holtzman, Effect of tracking error on DS-CDMA successive interference cancellation, IEEE Global Communications Conference, San Francisco, pp. 166–170, December 1994.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Caffery and G. L. Stuber, Non-linear multiuser parameter estimation and tracking in CDMA systems, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 48, No. 12, pp. 2053–2063, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. L. Chen and C. H. Wei, On the performance of rate-1/2 convolutional codes with QPSK on Rician fading channels, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 161–170, 1990.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. W. Modestino and S. Y. Mui, Convolutional code performance in the Rician fading channel, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 592–606, 1976.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. G. Proakis, Digital Communications, 4th ed. McGraw Hill, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Verdu, Multiuser Detection, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. B. Wicker, Error control systems for Digital Communications and Storage, Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Simon and D. Divisalar, Some new twists to problems involving the Gaussian probability integrals, IEEE Transactions on Communications, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 200–210, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringSRM UniversityKattankulathur, Kancheepuram Dt.India

Personalised recommendations