Channel Models for Medical Implant Communication
- 483 Downloads
Information regarding the propagation media is typically gathered by conducting physical experiments, measuring and processing the corresponding data to obtain channel characteristics. When this propagation media is human body, for example in case of medical implants, then this approach might not be practical. In this paper, an immersive visualization environment is presented, which is used as a scientific instrument that gives us the ability to observe RF propagation from medical implants inside a human body. This virtual environment allows for more natural interaction between experts with different backgrounds, such as engineering and medical sciences. Here, we show how this platform has been used to determine channel models for medical implant communication systems.
KeywordsChannel model Implant communication system Immersive visualization system Body area networks
The authors would like to thank Mr. Steven Satterfield from the high performance computing and visualization group of the Applied and Computational Mathematics Division, ITL, for his assistance in the system setup and his ongoing contribution in the development of tools for the NIST immersive visualization system.
- 2.E. H. Sarraf, G. K. Wong, and K. Takahata, Frequency-selectable wireless actuation of hydrogel using micromachined resonant heaters toward implantable drug delivery applications. Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, pp. 1525–1528. Denver, CO, USA, 21–25 June 2009.Google Scholar
- 3.K. H. Shin, C. Y. Moon, T. H. Lee, C. H. Lim, and Y. J. Kim, Implantable flexible wireless pressure sensor module, Sensors, 2004, Proceedings of IEEE Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 844–847. Seoul, Korea, 2004.Google Scholar
- 4.H. Fassbender, W. Mokwa, M. Gortz, K. Trieu, U. Urban, T. Schmitz-Rode, T. Gottsche, and P. Osypka, Fully implantable blood pressure sensor for hypertonic patients. IEEE Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, pp. 1226–1229. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2008.Google Scholar
- 8.W. Yang, K. Sayrafian-Pour, J. Hagedorn, J. Terrill, and K. Y. Yazdandoost, Simulation study of body surface RF propagation for UWB wearable medical sensors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, ISABEL, 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.J. G. Hagedorn, J. P. Dunkers, S. G. Satterfield, A. P. Peskin, J. T. Kelso, and J. E. Terrill, Measurement tools for the immersive visualization environment: steps toward the virtual laboratory. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standard and Technology, Vol. 112, No. 5, pp. 257–270, 2007.Google Scholar
- 10.C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory, Analysis and Design, vol. 2nd, John Wiley & Sons Inc.New York, 1997.Google Scholar
- 11.C. Polk and E. Postow, Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, CRC Press, Inc.Boca Raton, 1996. ISBN 0-8493-0641-8.Google Scholar
- 13.K. Y. Yazdandoost and R. Kohno, An antenna for medical implant communication systems. Proceedings of the 37th European Microwave Conference, Munich, Germany. Oct. 2007Google Scholar
- 14.K. Y. Yazdandoost and R. Kohno, Body implanted medical device communications. IEICE Transactions on Communications, Vol. E92-B, No. 2, pp. 2741–2749, 2009.Google Scholar
- 15.P. S. Hall and Y. Hao, Antennas and Propagation for Body Centric Wireless Communications, Artech House, Inc.Norwood, MA, 2006. ISBN 1-58053-493-7.Google Scholar