Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 1486–1497 | Cite as

Steering Quantum Dynamics of a Two-Qubit System via Optimal Bang-Bang Control

  • Juju Hu
  • Qiang Ke
  • Yinghua Ji
Article

Abstract

The optimization of control time for quantum systems has been an important field of control science attracting decades of focus, which is beneficial for efficiency improvement and decoherence suppression caused by the environment. Based on analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the existing Lyapunov control, using a bang-bang optimal control technique, we investigate the fast state control in a closed two-qubit quantum system, and give three optimized control field design methods. Numerical simulation experiments indicate the effectiveness of the methods. Compared to the standard Lyapunov control or standard bang-bang control method, the optimized control field design methods effectively shorten the state control time and avoid high-frequency oscillation that occurs in bang-bang control.

Keywords

Optimal bang-bang control Fast state control Quantum system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61663016 and 11404150.

References

  1. 1.
    Ran, D., Shi, Z.C., Song, J., Xia, Y.: Phys. Rev. A 96, 033803 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ji, Y.H., Hu, J.J., Huang, J.H., Ke, Q.: Physica E 81, 77 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong, D.Y., Petersen, I.R.: Automatica 48, 725 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, A.X., Nie, W.J., Li, L., Zeng, W., Liao, Q.H., Xiao, X.B.: Opt. Commun. 403, 97 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, Y., Deng, L., Chen, A.X.: Ann. Phys. 353, 1 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao, Q., Dong, D., Petersen, I.R.: Automatica 71, 125 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu, J.J., Ke, Q., Ji, Y.H.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 30, 1650177 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cong, S., Hu, L.Z., Yang, F., Liu, J.X.: Acta Automat. Sin. 39, 360 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hanson, R., Kouwenhoven, L.P., Petta, J.R., Tarucha, S., Vandersypen, L.M.K.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 79, 1217 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y., Tsai, J.: Nature 398, 786 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morello, A., Pla, J.J., Zwanenburg, F.A., Chan, K.W., Tan, K.Y., Huebl, H., Möttönen, M., Nugroho, C.D., Yang, C.Y., van Donkelaar, J.A., Alves, A.D., Jamieson, D.N., Escott, C.C., Hollenberg, L.C.L., Clark, R.G., Dzurak, A.S.: Nature 467, 687 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jelezko, F., Gaebel, T., Popa, I., Gruber, A., Wrachtrup, J.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 76401 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nerkararyan, K.V., Yezekyan, T.S., Bozhevolnyi, S.I.: Phys. Rev. B 97, 045401 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jahromi, H.R.: Opt. Commun. 411, 119 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, Y.H., Shi, Z.C., Song, J., Xia, Y., Zheng, S.B.: Phys. Rev. A 96, 043853 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, X.Y., Guo, Y.Q., Pei, P., Yi, X.X.: Phys. Rev. A 95, 063825 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khaneja, N., Brockett, R., Glaser, S.J.: Phys Rev A 63, 032308 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yuan, H., Khaneja, N.: Phys. Rev. A 72, 040301 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ji, Y.H., Hu, J.J., Ke, Q., Zhan, X.F.: Optik 139, 373 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu, S., Chen, M.Z.Q.: IET Control Theory Appl. 8, 86 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hou, S.C., Khan, M.A., Dong, D., Petersen, I.R., Yi, X.X.: Phys. Rev. A 86, 022321 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yi, X.X., Wu, S.L., Wu, C.F., Feng, X.L., Oh, C.H.: J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 195503 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, L.C., Hou, S.C., Yi, X.X., Dong, D., Petersen, I.R.: Phys. Lett. A 378, 1074 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ji, Y.H., Ke, Q., Hu, J.J.: Optik 142, 489 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindblad, G.: Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuang, S., Cong, S.: Acta Automat. Sin. 36, 1257 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuang, S., Cong, S.: Automatica 44, 98 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuang, S., Dong, D., Petersen, I.R.: Automatica 81, 164 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Huang, J.F., Law, C.K.: Phys. Rev. A 91, 023806 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhou, W., Schirmer, S. G., Zhang, M., Dai, H.Y.: J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 105303 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Physics and Communication ElectronicsJiangxi Normal UniversityNanchangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Photoelectronics and Telecommunication of Jiangxi ProvinceNanchangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations