Skip to main content
Log in

Faithful Pointer for Qubit Measurement

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of von Neumann projective measurement scenario for a qubit system, it is widely believed that the mutual orthogonality between the post-interaction pointer states is the sufficient condition for achieving the ideal measurement situation. However, for experimentally verifying the observable probabilities, the real space distinction between the pointer distributions corresponding to post-interaction pointer states play crucial role. It is implicitly assumed that mutual orthogonality ensures the support between the post-interaction pointer distributions to be disjoint. We point out that mutual orthogonality (formal idealness) does not necessarily imply the real space distinguishability (operational idealness), but converse is true. In fact, for the commonly referred Gaussian wavefunction, it is possible to obtain a measurement situation which is formally ideal but fully nonideal operationally. In this paper, we derive a class of pointer states, that we call faithful pointers, for which the degree of formal (non)idealness is equal to the operational (non)idealness. In other words, for the faithful pointers, if a measurement situation is formally ideal then it is operationally ideal and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scully, M.O., Lamb, W.E. Jr., Barut, A.: Found. Phys. 17, 575 (1987)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Platt, D.E.: Am. J. Phys. 60, 306 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Home, D., Pan, A.K., Ali, Md. M., Majumdar, A.S.: J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 13975 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Home, D., Pan, A.K.: J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 085301 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu, B.C., Berrondo, M., Van Huele, J.-F.S.: Phys. Rev. A 83, 012109 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozawa, M.: Ann. Phys. 311, 350 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Busch, P., Grabowski, M., Lahti, P.J.: Operational Quantum Theory. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva, R., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 250401 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bohm, D.: Quantum Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ford, G., O’Connell, R.F.: Am. J. Phys. 70, 319 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinett, R.W., Doncheski, M.A., Bassett, L.C.: Found. Phys. Lett. 18, 455 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

AKP acknowledges the support from Ramanujan Fellowship research grant(SB/S2/RJN-083/2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, A., Pan, A.K. Faithful Pointer for Qubit Measurement. Int J Theor Phys 57, 554–561 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3588-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-017-3588-z

Keywords

Navigation