International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 49, Issue 12, pp 3233–3242 | Cite as

Comparative Similarity in Branching Space-Times

  • Tomasz Placek


My aim in this paper is to investigate the notions of comparative similarity definable in the framework of branching space-times. A notion of this kind is required to give a rigorous Lewis-style semantics of space-time counterfactuals. In turn, the semantical analysis is needed to decide whether the recently proposed proofs of the non-locality of quantum mechanics are correct. From among the three notions of comparative similarity I select two which appear equally good as far as their intuitiveness and algebraic properties are concerned. However, the relations are not transitive, and thus cannot be used in the semantics proposed by Lewis (J. Philos. Log. 2:418–446, 1973), which requires transitivity. Yet they are adequate for the account of Lewis (J. Philos. Log. 10:217–234, 1981).


Modal logic Counterfactuals Comparative similarity Branching space-times 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Belnap, N.: Branching space-time. Synthese 92, 385–434 (1992) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belnap, N.: Various notes on outcomes in branching histories. Unpublished manuscript, Pittsburgh University (1995) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finkelstein, J.: Space-time counterfactuals. Synthese 119(3), 287–298 (1999) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kowalski, T., Placek, T.: Outcomes in branching space-time and GHZ-Bell theorems. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 50, 349–375 (1999) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals and comparative possibility. J. Philos. Log. 2, 418–446 (1973). Reprinted in Lewis, D.: Philosophical Papers, vol.II. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lewis, D.: Ordering semantics and premise semantics for counterfactuals. J. Philos. Log. 10, 217–234 (1981) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewis, D.: New work for a theory of universals. Australas. J. Philos. 61, 343–377 (1983) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller, T.: Branching space-time, modal logic, and the counterfactual conditional. In: Placek, T., Butterfield, J. (eds.) Non-locality and Modality. NATO Science Series. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Placek, T.: Stochastic outcomes in branching space-time. An analysis of the Bell theorems. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 51(3), 445–475 (2000) MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Placek, T.: Indeterminism is enough: a branching analysis of Bell-type theorems. In: Placek, T., Butterfield, J. (eds.) Non-locality and Modality. NATO Science Series. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stapp, H.P.: Nonlocal character of quantum theory. Am. J. Phys. 65(4), 300–304 (1997) CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stapp, H.P.: (2000). Nonlocality, counterfactuals, and consistent histories. quant-ph/9905055
  13. 13.
    Vaidman, L.: Time symmetrized counterfactuals in quantum theory. Found. Phys. 29(5), 755–765 (1999) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations