Agency Troubles: a Review of Isaac Reed’s Power in Modernity: Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020)

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Alexander, J. C. (2006): The civil sphere. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

  2. Alexander, J. C. (2011). Social, political, cultural and performative. In J. Alexander (Ed.), Performance and Power (pp. 92–103). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Binder, W. (2013). Abu Ghraib und die Folgen. Ein Skandal als ikonische Wende im Krieg gegen den Terror. Bielefeld: transcript.

  4. Binder, W. (2015). Tales of abuse and torture. The narrative framing of the Abu Ghraib photographs. In: Framing excessive violence. Discourse and dynamics, ed. Daniel Ziegler et al., 197–223. New York; Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

  5. Binder, W. (2019). Social imaginaries and the limits of differential meaning. A cultural sociological critique of symbolic meaning structures, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 44(Suppl 2), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brandom, R. (2008). Georg Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit. Topoi, 27(1), 161–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buck-Morss, S. (2000). Hegel and Haiti. Critical Inquiry, 26(4), 821–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Durkheim, E. (2013). The division of labour in society. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Durkheim, É. (1995/1912). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.

  10. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.

  11. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency. An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon.

  12. Grimes, D. R. (2016). On the viability of conspiratorial beliefs. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hegel, G. W. F. (2018/1807). The phenomenology of the spirit. New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  14. Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom’s right. The social foundations of democratic life. Cambridge: Polity.

  15. Kantorowicz, E. (1957). The king’s two bodies. A study in Mediaeval political theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  16. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1961). Tristes Tropiques. New York: Kriterion.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Manow, P. (2010). King’s shadow. The political anatomy of democratic representation Cambridge; Malden: Polity.

  18. Meyer, K. (2018). Das konspirologische Denken. Weilerswirst: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moffitt, B. (2015). How to perform crisis: a model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition, 50(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinkard, T. (1994). Hegel’s phenomenology. The sociality of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  22. Popper, K. R. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  23. Rauer, V. (2006). Willy Brandt's Kneefall at the Warsaw Memorial. In: Social performance. Symbolic action, cultural pragmatics, and ritual, ed. Jeffrey C. Alexander et al., 257–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  24. Reed, I. (2011). Interpretation and social knowledge. On the use of theory in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  25. Reed, I. (2020). Power in modernity. Agency relations and the creative destruction of the king’s two bodies. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press.

  26. Reed, I. A. (2017). On the very idea of cultural sociology. In: Social theory now, ed. Claudio E. Benzecry et al., 25–48. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.

  27. Stölting, E.(1997). Charismatische Aspekte des politischen Führerkults. Das Beispiel Stalin. In: Politische Religion – religiöse Politik ed. Richard Faber, 45–74. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

  28. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Outline of an interpretative sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download references


The author thanks Dominik Želinský for his thoughtful and straightforward comments on an early draft, and in particular for the discussion that followed them.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Binder.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The author's reply to this comment is available at

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binder, W. Agency Troubles: a Review of Isaac Reed’s Power in Modernity: Agency Relations and the Creative Destruction of the King’s Two Bodies (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020). Int J Polit Cult Soc (2021).

Download citation