Advertisement

Thermal Recovery from Cold-Working in Type K Bare-Wire Thermocouples

  • A. D. GreenenEmail author
  • E. S. Webster
TEMPMEKO 2016
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. TEMPMEKO 2016: Selected Papers of the 13th International Symposium on Temperature, Humidity, Moisture and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science

Abstract

Cold-working of most thermocouples has a significant, direct impact on the Seebeck coefficient which can lead to regions of thermoelectric inhomogeneity and accelerated drift. Cold-working can occur during the wire swaging process, when winding the wire onto a bobbin, or during handling by the end user—either accidentally or deliberately. Swaging-induced cold-work in thermocouples, if uniformly applied, may result in a high level of homogeneity. However, on exposure to elevated temperatures, the subsequent recovery process from the cold-working can then result in significant drift, and this can in turn lead to erroneous temperature measurements, often in excess of the specified manufacturer tolerances. Several studies have investigated the effects of cold-work in Type K thermocouples usually by bending, or swaging. However, the amount of cold-work applied to the thermocouple is often difficult to quantify, as the mechanisms for applying the strains are typically nonlinear when applied in this fashion. A repeatable level of cold-working is applied to the different wires using a tensional loading apparatus to apply a known yield displacement to the thermoelements. The effects of thermal recovery from cold-working can then be accurately quantified as a function of temperature, using a linear gradient furnace and a high-resolution homogeneity scanner. Variation in these effects due to differing alloy compositions in Type K wire is also explored, which is obtained by sourcing wire from a selection of manufacturers. The information gathered in this way will inform users of Type K thermocouples about the potential consequences of varying levels of cold-working and its impact on the Seebeck coefficient at a range of temperatures between \(\sim 70\,^\circ \)C and \(600\,^\circ \)C. This study will also guide users on the temperatures required to rapidly alleviate the effects of cold-working using thermal annealing treatments.

Keywords

Base metal Cold-work Inhomogeneity Thermocouple Type K 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out during a 2 month secondment by Adam Greeenen to the Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand (MSL). Adam acknowledges funding from the UK National Measurement System, the NPL International Secondments Scheme and MSL in order to make this secondment possible. The authors would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Jonathan Pearce in regard to facilitation the secondment, and to MSL for being excellent hosts during Adam’s secondment.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoskins Manufacturing Company, Hoskins Chromel-Alumel Thermocouple Alloys, Catalog M-61 (Hoskins Mfg. Co. Detroit, Mich., 1961)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.A. Burley, R.M. Hess, C.F. Howie, J.A. Coleman, The nicrosil versus nisil thermocouple: a critical comparison with the ANSI standard letter-designated base-metal thermocouples. Temp. Meas. Control Sci. Ind. 6, 1159–1166 (1982)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E.S. Webster, Low-temperature drift in MIMS base-metal thermocouples. Int. J. Thermophys. 35, 574–595 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.D. Pollock, D.I. Finch, The effect of cold-working upon thermoelements. Temp. Meas. Control Sci. Ind. 4, 237 (1962)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.F. Potts Jr., D.L. McElroy, The effect of cold working, heat treatment, and oxidation on the thermal emf of nickel-base thermoelements. Temp. Meas. Control Sci. Ind. 4, 243–264 (1962)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W.P. White, The constancy of thermoelements. Phys. Rev. (Series I) 23, 449–474 (1906)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Campari, S. Garribba, The behavior of Type K thermocouples in temperature measurement: the chromel P-alumel thermocouples. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 644–653 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.W. McCulloch, J.H. Clift, Lifetime improvement of sheathed thermocouples for use in high-temperature and thermal transient operations. Temp. Meas. Control Sci. Ind. 6, 34 (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.W. Fenton, The travelling gradient approach to thermocouple research. Temp. Meas. Control Sci. Ind. 5, 1973–1990 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.S. Webster, D.R. White, H. Edgar, Measurement of inhomogeneities in MIMS thermocouples using a linear-gradient furnace and dual heat-pipe scanner. Int. J. Thermophys. 36, 444–466 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.R. White, R.S. Mason, A thermocouple homogeneity scanner based on an open pressure-controlled water heatpipe. Int. J. Thermophys. 31, 1654–1662 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Pavlasek, C.J. Elliott, J.V. Pearce, S. Duris, R. Palencar, M. Koval, G. Machin, Hysteresis effects and strain-induced homogeneity effects in base metal thermocouples. Int. J. Thermophys. 36, 467–481 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM, Standard Specification and Temperature-Electromotive Force (emf) Tables for Standardized Thermocouples, (ASTM International, 2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Webster, D.R. White, Thermocouple homogeneity scanning. Metrologia 52, 130 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.G. Kollie, J.L. Horton, K.R. Carr, M.B. Herskovitz, C.A. Mossman, Temperature measurement errors with Type K (Chromel vs. Alumel) thermocouples due to short-ranged ordering in Chromel. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46, 1447–1461 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.E. Bentley, The Handbook of Temperature Measurement Vol. 3: Theory and Practice of Thermoelectric Thermometry (Springer, Singapore, 1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E.S. Webster, Thermal preconditioning of MIMS Type K thermocouples to reduce drift. Int. J. Thermophys. 38, 5 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Physical Laboratory (NPL)TeddingtonUK
  2. 2.Measurement Standards Laboratory (MSL)Lower HuttNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations