Advertisement

A New Method of Processing Mach–Zehnder Interference Fringe Data in Determination of Diffusion Coefficient

  • Maogang He
  • Ying Guo
  • Qiu Zhong
  • Ying Zhang
Article

Abstract

Laser holographic interferometry is the newest method to measure the mass diffusion coefficient and has been widely used in recent years. The processing of interference fringe images is a critical step of getting the final precise experimental results. On the basis of Fourier transformation and phase measurements, a new method of processing Mach–Zehnder interference fringes is introduced in this article. By experimental verification and uncertainty analysis, the accuracy of this method is validated. Mass diffusion coefficients of ethylene glycol dimethyl ether and diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, two new fuel additives in air were measured with the method introduced in this study.

Keywords

Mass diffusion coefficient Laser holographic interferometry Ethylene glycol dimethyl ether Diethylene glycol dimethyl ether 

References

  1. 1.
    Spagnolo G.S., Ambrosini D., Ponticiello A., Paoletti D.: J. Phys. III France 6, 1117 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anand A., Chhaniwal V.K., Mukherjee S., Narayanamurthy C.S.: Opt. Laser Technol. 34, 45 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chhaniwal V.K., Anand A., Girhe S., Patil D., Subrahmanyam N., Narayanamurthy C.S.: J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. (Special Edition) 5, S329 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ying G., Maogang H., Qiu Z., Ying Z.: Energy 34, 1560 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruckenstein E., Hongqin L.: Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 3927 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grass G.M., Sweetana S.A.: Pharmaceut. Res. 5, 372 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsunaqa N., Hori M.: Heat Transf. Asian Res. 31, 182 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Botton V., Lehmann P.: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 44, 3345 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hushcha T.O., Luik A.I.: Talanta 53, 29 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gabelmann-Gray L., Fenichel H.: Appl. Opt. 18, 343 (1979)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mattisson C., Nylander T., Axelsson A., Zacchi G.: Chem. Phys. Lipids 84, 1 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He M.G., zhong Q., Zhang Y.: High Temp.-High Press. 37, 61 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ying G., Maogang H., Qiu Z., Ying Z.: J. Chem. Eng. Data 53, 2861 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen G.Y., Bui T.D., Krzyzak A.: Integr. Comp.-Aided Eng. 12, 99 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Donoho D.L.: IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 41, 613 (1995)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gray L.G., Fenichel H.: Appl. Opt. 18, 343 (1979)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (International Organization for Standardization, Genevese, 1995), pp. 116–134 (corrected and reprinted)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Multiphase Flow in Power EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations