Activity Budgets and Habitat Use of Wild Southern Pig-Tailed Macaques (Macaca nemestrina) in Oil Palm Plantation and Forest

  • Nadine Ruppert
  • Anna Holzner
  • Khai Wei See
  • Anna Gisbrecht
  • Angelika Beck
Article

Abstract

Conversion of primary rainforest to agricultural land causes habitat loss and fragmentation and is a major threat to wild primates worldwide. Conversion of forest to oil palm plantations (Elaeis guineensis) is a particular problem, so it is important to understand whether and how primates use such plantations. Populations of southern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) are declining in Peninsular Malaysia due, in large part, to conversion of primary forests to oil palm plantations. Researchers have observed macaques foraging in plantations but little information is available about how macaques cope with the expansion of plantations into their habitat. We collected GPS data on the home range of a group of wild pig-tailed macaques that foraged in both habitat types in May 2013–May 2015, and compared their use of oil palm plantation and primary rainforest by recording their activity budgets and analyzing their habitat use and diet in both habitat types 4–6 days per week in October 2014–December 2015. The group visited the plantations daily. In 2013–2014, 17% of the group’s overall home range core area (0.6 km2) was in oil palm plantations and in 2014–2015, this increased to 28%. However, the macaques spent most of the day time in the forest and always used a sleeping tree in the forest. Macaque activity budgets in the plantation were significantly different from those in the forest. Feeding and foraging comprised a significantly larger proportion of their activity budget in the plantation, while locomotion, resting, and social behaviors occurred significantly more often in the forest. In both habitats, macaques spent most of their time on the ground and foraged primarily on the ground in the plantation. Of food items eaten in the plantation 85% were oil palm parts, including attached and fallen oil palm fruits and seeds, and flowers. Oil palm plantations serve as additional foraging ground for these macaques, but our results also show that the forest is essential, providing a greater dietary diversity and sleeping sites and allowing resting and social activities. It is not clear to what degree pig-tailed macaque populations can adapt to human-altered environments in the long term. Although our study group used oil palm plantations as regular foraging and feeding ground, pig-tailed macaques are also closely associated with the rainforest habitat, and the protection of natural forest is essential for their conservation.

Keywords

Cercopithecidae Elaeis guineensis Home range Human–primate interface Peninsular Malaysia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge The Rufford Foundation UK (RSG 16978-1) and USM Short-Term Grant (304/PBIOLOGI/6313256) for funding, and the Perak State Forestry Department and the Department of Wildlife and National Parks Peninsular Malaysia for issuing respective research permits. We thank Drs. Asyraf Mansor, Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah, and Hamdan Ahmad for their assistance in providing the necessary logistics during the pilot phase of this project. Our deepest gratitude goes to Dr. Antje Engelhardt for her guidance and strong support to kick-start this ongoing long-term project, and her valuable comments on the early manuscript drafts. We also thank Samantha Gate for helping to conduct the feeding scans. We are very grateful to all students, volunteers, friends, and colleagues who assisted in the preparations for this project, in the habituation process of the initially two groups of macaques, and who helped with logistics and field work. We also thank Dr. Susan Lappan for proofreading and the anonymous reviewers and journal editor for providing useful comments that strongly improved this article.

References

  1. Albert, A., Savini, T., & Huynen, M.-C. (2011). Sleeping site selection and presleep behavior in wild pigtailed macaques. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 1222–1230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, A., Huynen, M.-C., Savini, T., & Hambuckers, A. (2013a). Influence of food resources on the ranging pattern of northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina). International Journal of Primatology, 34, 696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert, A., Hambuckers, A., Culot, L., Savini, T., & Huynen, M.-C. (2013b). Frugivory and seed dispersal by Northern pigtailed macaques (Macaca leonina), in Thailand. International Journal of Primatology, 34, 170–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albert, A., McConkey, K., Savini, T., & Huynen, M.-C. (2014). The value of disturbance-tolerant cercopithecine monkeys as seed dispersers in degraded habitats. Biological Conservation, 170, 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azhar, B., Lindenmayer, D., Wood, J., Fischer, J. A. M., McElhinny, C., & Zakaria, M. (2012). Contribution of illegal hunting, culling of pest species, road accidents and feral dogs to biodiversity loss in established oil-palm landscapes. Wildlife Research, 40(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azlan, M. J., & Sharma, D. S. K. (2006). The diversity and activity patterns of wild felids in a secondary forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Oryx, 40, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benchimol, M., & Peres, C. A. (2013). Predicting primate local extinctions within “real-world” forest fragments: A pan-Neotropical analysis. American Journal of Primatology, 76(3), 289–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, I. (1967). A field study of the pigtail monkey (Macaca nemestrina). Primates, 8, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertrand, M. (1967). Training without reward: Traditional training of pig-tailed macaques as coconut harvesters. Science, 155(3761), 484–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradshaw, C. J. A., Navjot, S. S., & Brook, B. W. (2008). Tropical turmoil: A biodiversity tragedy in progress. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caldecott, J. (1986a). An ecological and behavioural study of the pig-tailed macaque. Contributions to Primatology (Vol. 21). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  12. Caldecott, J. (1986b). Mating patterns, societies and the ecogeography of macaques. Animal Behaviour, 34, 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldecott, J. O., Feistner, A. T. C., & Gadsby, E. L. (1996). A comparison of ecological strategies of pig-tailed macaques, mandrills and drills. In J. E. Fa & D. G. Lindburg (Eds.), Evolution and ecology of macaque societies (pp. 73–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell-Smith, G., Simanjorang, H. V. P., Leader-Williams, N., & Linkie, M. (2010). Local attitudes and perceptions toward crop-raiding by orangutans (Pongo abelii) and other nonhuman primates in northern Sumatra, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 866–876.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, C. A., & Peres, C. A. (2001). Primate conservation in the new millennium: The role of scientists. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10, 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choudhury, A. (2003). The pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina in India: Status and conservation. Primate Conservation, 19, 91–98.Google Scholar
  17. Crockett, C., & Wilson, W. (1980). The ecological separation of Macaca nemestrina and M. fascicularis in Sumatra. In D. G. Lindburg (Ed.), The macaques: Studies in ecology, behavior and evolution (pp. 148–181). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  18. Danielsen, F., & Heegaard, H. (1995). Impact of logging and plantation development on species diversity: A case study from Sumatra. In Ø. Sandbuk (Ed.), Management of tropical forests: Towards an integrated perspective (pp. 73–92). Oslo: Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  19. Donald, P. (2004). Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conservation Biology, 18, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estrada, A. (2013). Socioeconomic context of primate conservation: Population, poverty, global economic demands, and sustainable land use. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 30–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Estrada, A., Raboy, B. E., & Oliveira, L. C. (2012). Agroecosystems and primate conservation in the tropics: A review. American Journal of Primatology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22033.
  22. Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Rylands, A. B., Roos, C., Fernandez-Duque, E., et al (2017). Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: Why primates matter. Science Advances, 3(1), e1600946.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO. (2007). FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), http://faostat.fao.org.
  24. Fitzherbert, E. B., Struebig, M. J., Morel, A., Danielsen, F., Bruhl, C. A., et al (2008). How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 538–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GraphPad Software (2017). Available from https://www.graphpad.com/.
  26. Harich, F. K., & Treydte, A. C. (2016). Mammalian wildlife diversity in rubber and oil palm plantations. CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources.  https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201611020.
  27. Harris, S., Cresswell, W. J., Forde, P. G., Trewhella, W. J., Woollard, T., & Wray, S. (1990). Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data: A review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review, 20(2–3), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johns, A. D., & Skorupa, J. (1987). Responses of rain forest primates to habitat disturbance: A review. International Journal of Primatology, 8(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. José-Domínguez, J. M., Huynen, M. C., García, C. J., Albert-Daviaud, A., Savini, T., & Asensio, N. (2015a). Non-territorial macaques can range like territorial gibbons when partially provisioned with food. Biotropica, 47(6), 733–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. José-Domínguez, J., Savini, T., & Asenio, N. (2015b). Ranging and site fidelity in Northern pig-tailed macaques (Macaca leonina) over different temporal scales. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 841–853.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman, C., & Rosenblum, L. A. (1966). A behavioral taxonomy for Macaca nemestrina and Macaca radiata: Based on longitudinal observation of family groups in the laboratory. Primates, 7(2), 205–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koh, L. P., & Wilcove, D. S. (2008). Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters, 1, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koh, L. P., Miettinen, J., Liew, S. C., & Ghazoul, J. (2011). Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm. PNAS, 108, 5127–5132.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang, K. (2005). Primate factsheets: Pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina) taxonomy, morphology & ecology. http://pin.primate.wisc.gedu/factsheets/entry/pigtail_macaque.
  35. Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J., & Cassman, K. G. (2013). Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1776, 1–10.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, P. C., & Priston, N. E. C. (2005). Human attitudes to primates: Perceptions of pests, conflict and consequences for primate conservation. In J. D. Paterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Special topics in primatology, Vol. 4: Commensalism and conflict: The human–primate interface. Norman: American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar
  37. Linkie, M., Dinaya, Y., Nofrianto, A., & Leader-Williams, N. (2007). Patterns and perceptions of wildlife crop raiding in and around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Animal Conservation, 10, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luskin, M. S., Christina, E. D., Kelley, L. C., & Potts, M. D. (2013). Modern hunting practices and wild meat trade in the oil palm plantation-dominated landscapes of Sumatra, Indonesia. Human Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9606-8.
  39. Maddox, T., Priatna, D., Gemita, E., & Salampessy, A. (2007). The conservation of tigers and other wildlife in oil palm plantations. Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. London: The Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  40. Malaivijitnond, S., Arsaithamkul, V., Tanaka, H., Pomchote, P., Jaroenporn, S., et al (2012). Boundary zone between northern and southern pig-tailed macaques and their morphological differences. Primates, 53, 377–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Malaysian Meterological Department. (2016). http://en.tutiempo.net/climate/2014/ws-486200.html.
  42. Marchal, V., & Hill, C. (2009) Primate crop-raiding: a study of local perceptions in four villages in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Primate Conservation, 24: 107–116.Google Scholar
  43. Meijaard, E., & Sheil, D. (2013). Oil-palm plantations in the context of biodiversity conservation. In S.A. Levin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00340-3.
  44. Myers, N., Russell, A. M., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Oi, T. (1990a). Patterns of dominance and affiliation in wild pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina nemestrina) in West Sumatra. International Journal of Primatology, 11, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oi, T. (1990b). Population organization of wild pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina nemestrina) in West Sumatra. Primates, 31, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Palm Oil Research Institute Malaysia (1994). Environmental impacts of oil palm plantations in Malaysia. Malaysia: Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia.Google Scholar
  48. Richardson, M., Mittermeier, R., Rylands, A., & Konstant, B. (2008). Macaca nemestrina. doi: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T12555A3356892.en.
  49. Rodman, P. S. (1978). Diets, densities and distributions of Bornean primates. In G. G. Montgomery (Ed.), The ecology of arboreal folivores (pp. 465–478). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ruppert, N., Asyraf, M., & Shahrul Anuar, M. S. (2014). A key role of the southern pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina (Linnaeus) in seed dispersal of non-climbing rattans in Peninsular Malaysia. Asian Primates Journal, 4, 42–51.Google Scholar
  51. Schwitzer, C., Glatt, L., Nekaris, K. A.-I., & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2011). Responses of animals to habitat alteration: An overview focussing on primates. Endangered Species Research, 14, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seaman, D. E., & Powell, R. A. (1990). Identifying patterns and intensity of home range use. In Bears: Their biology and management, Vol. 8 (pp. 243–249). A Selection of Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Bear Research and Management, Victoria, British Columbia, International Association of Bear Research and Management.Google Scholar
  53. Sha, J. C. M., & Hanya, G. (2013). Diet, activity, habitat use, and ranging of two neighboring groups of food-enhanced long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 75, 581–592.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Silverman, B. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Vol. 26. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, E. (1973). A further description of the control role in pigtail macaques, Macaca nemestrina. Primates, 14, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sodhi, N. S., Posa, M. R. C., Lee, T. M., Bickford, D., Koh, L. P., & Brook, B. W. (2010). The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Southwick, C. H., & Cadigan Jr., F. C. (1972). Population studies of Malaysian primates. Primates, 13(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. (2012). OpenJUMP HoRAE: A free GIS and toolbox for home-range analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 36(3), 600–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. S. (2013). A user manual to perform home range analysis and estimation with OpenJUMP HoRAE. http://www.geo.uzh.ch/~sstein/ojhorae/horae_documentation_v1.2final.pdf.
  60. Thierry, B., Bynum, E. L., Baker, S., Kinnaird, M. F., Matsumura, S., et al (2000). The social repertoire of Sulawesi macaques. Primate Research, 16, 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vijay, V., Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., & Smith, S. J. (2016). The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PLoS One, 11(7), e0159668.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, B. (2001). Rat control in oil palms and rice fields. Pesticide Outlook, 4, 71–74.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b102665h
  63. Yanuar, A., Chivers, D. J., Sugardjito, J., Martyr, D. J., & Holden, J. T. (2009). The population distribution of pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) and long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in west-central Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian Primates Journal, 1(2), 2–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMindenMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of BiologyHumboldt-University BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.BiocenterJulius-Maximilians University WürzburgWürzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations