Sampling Effort in Neotropical Primate Diet Studies: Collective Gains and Underlying Geographic and Taxonomic Biases
- 412 Downloads
Primates are among the most observable and best studied mammalian orders, yet the distribution of sampling effort by primatologists has inevitably concentrated on a few genera and a limited number of study sites. We present the first systematic review of sampling effort and associated biases in wild primate field research, focusing on dietary studies across the Neotropics. Our literature review of all 24 neotropical primate ecospecies spans 42 years (1969–2011) and covers 290 dietary studies at 164 study sites across 17 countries. We use a standardized measure of sampling effort to assimilate data sets derived from multiple methodologies and attempt to understand the distribution of effort (total equivalent to 193,804 h) using geographic variables and primate species traits. Results indicate that there are both geographic and taxonomic biases, with sampling effort generally skewed towards large-bodied species occupying large geographic ranges, and concentrated at a select few primatology research hubs. We also note that full primate assemblages at any given study site are rarely investigated. Our assessment thus reveals severely undersampled primate taxa and geographic regions that must be considered in future research. Current biases could be ameliorated by deliberately targeting poorly studied genera anywhere in their geographic distribution, well-studied genera in poorly studied regions, and striving to study multiple sympatric taxa within a single site. Although continued inequalities in sampling effort are probably inevitable, this study shows that this need not inhibit successful compilations and meta-analyses, provided that adequate data on feeding records and sampling effort can be made available.
KeywordsDiet Feeding ecology Mesoamerica Platyrrhini South America
This study was funded by a NERC doctoral studentship to JEH. We wish to thank all researchers who have contributed to the current knowledge of primate field studies across the Neotropics. We thank J. Setchell, E. Heymann, and four anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This paper was co-written during a CAPES-funded visiting fellowship by CAP to Museu Goeldi, Brazil.
- Arino, O., Bicheron, P., Achard, F., Latham, J., Witt, R., & Weber, J.-L. (2008). GlobCover: the most detailed portrait of earth. ESA Bulletin, 136, 24–31.Google Scholar
- Beyer, H. L. (2004). Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available at http://www.spatialecology.com/htools.
- Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University, and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). (2005). Gridded population of the world, version 3 (GPWv3): Population density grid. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Available at http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/set/gpw-v3-population-density.
- Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1977). Primate ecology: Studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys and apes. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Coimbra-Filho, A., & Mittermeier, R. A. (Eds.). (1981). Ecology and behaviour of neotropical primates, Vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira De Ciencias.Google Scholar
- ESA. (2008). GlobCover Land Cover v2 2008 database. European Space Agency, European Space Agency GlobCover Project, led by MEDIAS-France. Available at http://ionia1.esrin.esa.int/index.asp.
- Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Pavelka, M. S. M., & Luecke, L. (Eds.). (2006). New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: Distribution, ecology, behavior, and conservation. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
- Galetti, M., Giacomini, H. C., Bueno, R. S., Bernardo, C. S. S., Marques, R. M., Bovendorp, R. S., et al. (2009). Priority areas for the conservation of Atlantic forest large mammals. Biological Conservation, 142, 1229–1241.Google Scholar
- Garber, P. A., Estrada, A., Bicca-Marques, J. C., Heymann, E. W., & Strier, K. B. (Eds.). (2009). South American primates: Comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
- Google Inc. (2012). Google earth (Version 22.214.171.12413). Available at http://earth.google.com.
- Hawes, J. E., & Peres, C. A. (2013). Ecological correlates of trophic status and frugivory in neotropical primates. Oikos. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00745.x (in press).
- Hohmann, G., Robbins, M. M., & Boesch, C. (2006). Feeding ecology in apes and other primates: Ecological, physical, and behavioral aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- IUCN. (2011). The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2011.2. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed November 10, 2011).
- Kappeler, P. M., & Watts, D. P. (Eds.). (2012). Long-term field studies of primates. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Lehner, P. N. (1998). Handbook of ethological methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, A., & Foseca, G. A. B. (Eds.). (1988). Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2003). Nutrient requirements of nonhuman primates, 2nd revised edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Patterson, B. D., Ceballos, G., Sechrest, W., Tognelli, M. F., Brooks, T., Luna, L., et al. (2007). Digital distribution maps of the mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 3.0. Arlington: NatureServe.Google Scholar
- Peres, C. A., & Janson, C. H. (1999). Species coexistence, distribution, and environmental determinants of neotropical primate richness: A community-level zoogeographic analysis. In J. G. Fleagle, C. H. Janson, & K. E. Reed (Eds.), Primate communities (pp. 55–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pitman, N. C. A., Widmer, J., Jenkins, C. N., Stocks, G., Seales, L., Paniagua, F., et al. (2011). Volume and geographical distribution of ecological research in the Andes and the Amazon, 1995–2008. Tropical Conservation Science, 4, 64–81.Google Scholar
- Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G., & Mace, G. M. (2000). Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 1947–1952. Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
- Rylands, A. B., Coimbra-Filho, A. F., & Mittermeier, R. A. (2009). The systematics and distributions of the marmosets (Callithrix, Callibella, Cebuella, and Mico) and Callimico (Callimico) (Callitrichidae, Primates). In S. M. Ford, L. M. Porter, & L. C. Davis (Eds.), The smallest anthropoids (pp. 25–61). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rylands, A. B., Mallinson, J., Kleiman, D. G., Coimbra-Filho, A. F., Mittermeier, R. A., Gusmão Câmara, I., et al. (2002). A history of lion tamarin research and conservation. In D. G. Kleiman & A. B. Rylands (Eds.), Lion tamarins: Biology and conservation (pp. 3–41). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Rylands, A. B., & Mittermeier, R. A. (2009). The diversity of the new world primates (Platyrrhini): An annotated taxonomy. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds.), South American primates: Comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 23–54). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, R. J., & Jungers, W. L. (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 523–559.Google Scholar
- Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (1987). Primate societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Soini, P. (1986). A synecological study of a primate community in the Pacaya-Samiria National Reserve, Peru. Primate Conservation, 7, 63–71.Google Scholar
- Stallings, J. (1985). Distribution and status of primates in Paraguay. Primate Conservation, 6, 51–58.Google Scholar
- Strier, K. B. (2010). Primate behavioral ecology (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Strier, K. B., & Mendes, S. L. (2009). Long-term field studies of South American primates. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds.), South American primates: Comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 139–156). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- TEAM. (2011). Tropical ecology assessment & monitoring network: early warning system for nature. Terrestrial vertebrates – Manaus, Data Set Identifier: TEAM-DataPackage-20110620040207_3415.Google Scholar
- Terborgh, J. (1983). Five new world primates: A study in comparative ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Villalba, J. S., Prigioni, C. M., & Sappa, A. C. (1995). Sobre la posible presencia de Alouatta caraya en Uruguay. Neotropical Primates, 3, 173–174.Google Scholar