Abstract
Studies of collective decision making attempt to explain the simultaneous behaviors of many individuals and how these contribute to the behavior observed at a collective level. However, this can be problematic to achieve given the general constraints of field or experimental data. This is particularly the case for primates, and results in limited reproducibility of events and it is difficult to separate the effects of different variables. Advocates of theoretical models have proposed that simple rules of interaction successfully reproduce different phases of group movement and the transitions between them, and greatly contribute to our knowledge of complex phenomena. Models can simulate practically any situation and tell us what response would emerge from it, including complex situations such as group decision making. The general heuristic value of these models has been universally recognized. However, the modeling approach tends to oversimplify real situations, and very few biological validations yet exist. I here suggest that it is essential to confront theoretical results with real data and that the combination of the 2 approaches will substantially improve our comprehension of collective decision making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ballerini, M., Cabibbo, N., Candelier, R., Cavagna, A., Cisbani, E., Giardina, I., et al. (2008). Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. PNAS, 105, 1232–1237.
Berger, J. (1977). Organizational system and dominance in feral horses in the grand canyon. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2, 131–136.
Boinski, S. (1993). Vocal coordination of group movement among white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. American Journal of Primatology, 30, 85–100.
Bumann, D., Krause, J., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1997). Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: the danger of being in the front. Behaviour, 134, 1063–1076.
Byrne, R. W., Whiten, A., & Henzi, S. P. (1990). Social relationships of mountain baboons: leadership and affiliation in a non-female-bonded monkey. American Journal of Primatology, 20, 313–329.
Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433, 513–516.
Deneubourg, J. L., & Goss, S. (1989). Collective patterns and decision making. Ethology Ecology Evolution, 1, 295–311.
Dussutour, A., Fourcassié, V., Helbing, D., & Deneubourg, J.-L. (2004). Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded condition. Nature, 428, 70–73.
Grimm, V. (1999). Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling, 115, 129–148.
Hemelrijk, C. K. (1999). An individual-oriented model on the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 361–369.
Holekamp, K. E., Boydston, E. E., & Smale, L. (2000). Group travel in social carnivores. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber (Eds.), On the move (pp. 587–627). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, A., Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Petit, O. (2011). Social network influences decision making during collective movements in brown lemurs. International Journal of Primatology. doi:10.1007/s10764-011-9497-8.
Katsikopoulos, K. V., & King, A. J. (2010). Swarm intelligence in animal groups: when can a collective out-perform an expert? PLoS One, 5(11), e15505. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015505.
King, A. J., & Cowlishaw, G. (2007). When to use social information: the advantages of large group size in individual decision-making. Biology Letters, 3, 137–139.
King, A. J., & Cowlishaw, G. (2009). Leaders, followers and group-decision-making. Integrative and Communicative Biology, 2, 147–150.
Leca, J.-B., Gunst, N., Thierry, B., & Petit, O. (2003). Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 66, 1045–1052.
Mailleux, A. C., Devigne, C., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Detrain, C. (2010). Impact of starvation on Lasius niger's exploration. Ethology, 116, 248–256.
Menzel, C. R., & Beck, B. B. (2000). Homing and detour in golden lion tamarin social groups. In S. Boinski & P. A. Garber (Eds.), On the move (pp. 299–326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nagy, M., Akos, Z., Biro, D., & Viscsek, T. (2010). Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature, 464, 890–894.
Petit, O., Gautrais, J., Leca, J. B., Theraulaz, G., & Deneubourg, J. L. (2009). Collective decision-making in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 3495–3503.
Pillot, M. H., Gautrais, J., Gouello, J., Michelena, P., Sibbald, A., & Bon, R. (2010). Moving together: incidental leaders and naive followers. Behavioural Processes, 83, 235–241.
Puga-Gonzalez, I., Hildenbrandt, H., & Hemelrijk, C. K. (2009). Emergent patterns of social affiliation in primates, a model. PLoS Computational Biology, 5, e1000630. doi:1000610.1001371/journal.pcbi.1000630.
Radford, A. N. (2004). Vocal coordination of group movement by green woodhoopoes Phoeniculus purpureus. Ethology, 110, 11–20.
Ramseyer, A., Petit, O., & Thierry, B. (2009a). Decision-making in group departures of domestic domestic geese. Behaviour, 146, 351–371.
Ramseyer, A., Boissy, A., Thierry, B., & Dumont, B. (2009b). Individual and social determinants of spontaneous group movements in cattle and sheep. Animal, 39, 1319–1326.
Rands, S. A., Cowlishaw, G., Pettifor, R. A., Rowcliffe, J. M., & Johnsone, R. A. (2003). Spontaneous emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs. Nature, 423, 432–434.
Sueur, C., & Petit, O. (2008a). Organization of group members at departure is driven by social structure in Macaca. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 1085–1098.
Sueur, C., & Petit, O. (2008b). Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques? Behavioural Processes, 78, 84–92.
Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Petit, O. (2009). Selective mimetism at departure in collective movements of the Tonkean macaque (Macaca tonkeana): a theoretical and experimental approach. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1087–1095.
Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J.-L., Petit, O., & Couzin, I. (2010a). Differences in nutrient requirements imply a non-linear emergence of leaders in animal groups. PLoS Computational Biology, 6(9), e1000917.
Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Petit, O. (2010b). Sequence of quorums during collective decision-making in macaques. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1885–1895.
Sueur, C., Deneubourg, J. L., & Petit, O. (2010c). From the first intention movement to the last joiner: Macaques combine mimetic rules to optimize their collective decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2084
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 361, 5–22.
Acknowledgments
I thank the 3 anonymous reviewers and Andrew King and Joanna Setchell for their constructive comments for improving the manuscript. I also thank Cédric Sueur and Andrew King for the invitation to publish in this special issue.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petit, O. All Together Now: The Need for a Combined Empirical and Modeling Approach When Studying Primate Group Coordination. Int J Primatol 32, 1433–1442 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9545-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-011-9545-4