International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1397–1412 | Cite as

A Low-Cost Manipulation of Food Resources Reduces Spatial Overlap Between Baboons (Papio ursinus) and Humans in Conflict

  • Bentley S. Kaplan
  • M. Justin O’Riain
  • Rowen van Eeden
  • Andrew J. King


Competition over food and space is a primary driver of human–wildlife conflict. In the Cape Peninsula, South Africa, chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) have adapted to a human-modified environment, sleeping on the urban edge and raiding anthropogenic food sources on a daily basis. Human monitors, who herd baboons away from residential areas, are currently the preferred method of conflict mitigation. However, this method is costly and suffers from short-term interruptions, wherein the unexpected absence of monitors may lead to unprepared residents using lethal force to deter raiding baboons. Elsewhere in the chacma baboon distribution (in nonconflict areas), artificial food patches have been shown to alter troop movements drastically by eliciting consistent leadership behavior from alpha males. We investigated whether an artificial patch could be used to draw baboons away from the urban environment in the absence of monitors. First, we introduced an artificial food patch into natural land within a troop’s range and monitored movement and activity patterns. Although the troop utilized the patch, there was not a significant decline in use of the urban space as they continued to favor food in urban waste sites. Maintaining the patch, we then restricted access to these waste sites using wire-mesh fencing and observed a significant reduction in the time the troop spent within the urban space. In both experimental phases we observed consistent leadership, with dominant individuals arriving first at the patch and monopolizing food items thereon. Thus, we recommend the combined strategy of reducing raiding incentives in conjunction with provisioning as a short-term, cost-effective strategy to alter a baboon troop’s movement patterns and raiding frequency.


Baboon Despotism Human–wildlife conflict Leadership Provisioning 



We thank The Simon’s Town Civic Association, Peter de Villiers, Mrs. Dollery, and the South African Navy for their assistance and cooperation; Stuart and Judy Whittaker for their hospitality; Sabine Muëller for her assistance in the field; Tali Hoffman for assistance in spatial analyses; and 2 anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions on the manuscript. This work was supported by a South African National Research Foundation (NRF) grant awarded to M. J. O’Riain. A. J. King was supported by an AXA Postdoctoral Fellowship and a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Fellowship (NE.H016600.2). The experiment was approved by the University of Cape Town’s ethics committee and adhered to the legal requirements of South Africa.


  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 7716–7723.Google Scholar
  2. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49(3/4), 227–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2003). Variability in reproductive success viewed from a life-history perspective in baboons. American Journal of Human Biology, 15, 401–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2005). Growth rates in a wild primate population: ecological influences and maternal effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(5), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altmann, J., & Muruthi, P. (1988). Differences in daily life between semi provisioned and wild-feeding baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 15, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asquith, P. (1989). Provisioning and the study of free-ranging primates: history, effects and prospects. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 32(S10), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beamish, E. K. (2010). Causes and consequences of mortality and mutilation in the Cape Peninsula baboon population, South Africa. M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  8. Boug, A., Biquand, S., Biquand-Guyot, V., & Kamal, K. (1994). The response of commensal hamadryas baboons to seasonal reduction in food provisioning. Revue d’Écologie (La Terre et La Vie), 49, 307–319.Google Scholar
  9. Bronikowski, A. M., & Altmann, J. (1996). Foraging in a variable environment: weather patterns and the behavioral ecology of baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey, D., & Hein, D. (1983). Effects of heavy browsing on a bird community in deciduous forest. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 829–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2003). Group decision-making in animals. Nature, 421, 155–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005). Consensus decision making in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 449–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, S. M., & Ginnett, T. F. (2000). Potential effects of supplemental feeding of deer on nest predation. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(3), 660–666.Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, S. M., Owens, M. K., Cooper, R. M., & Ginnett, T. F. (2006). Effect of supplemental feeding on spatial distribution and browse utilization by white-tailed deer in semi-arid rangeland. Journal of Arid Environments, 66, 716–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowling, R. M., MacDonald, I. A. W., & Simmons, M. T. (1996). The Cape Peninsula, South Africa, physiographical, biological and historical background to an extraordinary hotspot of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devas, F. (2005). The influence of social relationships on foraging success in chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. De Vries, H., Netto, W. J., & Hanegraaf, P. L. H. (1993). Matman—a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour, 125, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Else, J. G. (1991). Nonhuman primates as pests. In H. O. Box (Ed.), Primate responses to environmental change (pp. 115–165). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Fersterer, P., Nolte, D. L., Ziegltrum, G. J., & Gossow, H. (2001). Effect of feeding stations on the home ranges of American black bears in western Washington. Ursus, 12, 51–53.Google Scholar
  21. Forthman, D. L., Strum, S. C., & Muchemi, G. (2005). Applied conditioned taste aversion and the management and conservation of crop-raiding primates. In J. D. Paterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: The human–primate interface (pp. 420–443). Norman, OK: American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar
  22. Forthman-Quick, D. L. (1986). Activity budgets and the consumption of human food in two troops of baboons, Papio anubis, at Gilgil, Kenya. In J. C. Else & P. C. Lee (Eds.), Primate ecology and conservation (pp. 221–228). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Grenier, D., Barrette, C., & Crête, M. (1999). Food access by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at winter feeding sites in eastern Québec. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 63, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical theory of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill, C. M. (2000). A conflict of interests between people and baboons: crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman, T. S., & O’Riain, M. J. (2010). The spatial ecology of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) in a human-modified environment. doi: 10.1007/s10764-010-9467-6.
  27. Katsvanga, C. A. T., Mudyiwa, S. M., & Gwenzi, D. (2006). Bark stripping and population dynamics of baboon troops after chemical control in pine plantations of Zimbabwe. African Journal of Ecology, 44, 413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, A. J., Douglas, C. M. S., Huchard, E., Isaac, N. J. B., & Cowlishaw, G. (2008). Dominance and affiliation mediate despotism in a social primate. Current Biology, 18, 1833–1838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. López-Bao, J. V., Rodríguez, A., & Palomares, F. (2009). Competitive asymmetries in the use of supplementary food by the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). PLoS ONE, 4(10), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marchal, V., & Hill, C. (2009). Primate crop-raiding: a study of local perceptions in four villages in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Primate Conservation, 24, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margalida, A., González, L. M., Sánchez, R., Oria, J., Prada, L., Caldera, J., et al. (2007). A long-term large-scale study of the breeding biology of the Spanish imperial eagle (Aquila adalberti). Journal of Ornithology, 148, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCollough, M. A., Todd, C. S., & Owen, R. B., Jr. (1994). Supplemental feeding program for wintering bald eagles in Maine. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22(2), 147–154.Google Scholar
  33. Mishra, C. (1997). Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environmental Conservation, 24, 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Naughton-Treves, L. (1997). Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review, 87, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naughton-Treves, L., Treves, A., Chapman, C., & Wrangham, R. (1998). Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nyhus, P. J., & Tilson, R. (2004). Characterizing human-tiger conflict in Sumatra, Indonesia: implications for conservation. Oryx, 38, 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Partridge, S. T., Nolte, D. L., Ziegltrum, G. J., & Robbins, C. T. (2001). Impacts of supplemental feeding on the nutritional ecology of black bears. Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2003). A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.0. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  39. Riley, E. P., & Priston, N. E. C. (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: exploring the human-nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 1–7.Google Scholar
  40. Ripple, W. J., & Beschta, R. L. (2007). Restoring Yellowstone’s aspen with wolves. Biological Conservation, 138, 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robb, G. N., McDonald, R. A., Chamberlain, D. E., & Bearhop, S. (2008). Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 6, 476–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rodgers, A. R., & Carr, A. P. (1998). HRE: The home range extension for ArcView! User’s manual. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  43. Rodriguez-Hidalgo, P., Gortazar, C., Tortosa, F. S., Rodriguez-Vigal, C., Fierro, Y., & Vicente, J. (2010). Effects of density, climate, and supplementary forage on body mass and pregnancy rates of female red deer in Spain. Oecologia, 164, 389–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roper, T. J., Findlay, S. R., Lüps, P., & Sheperdson, D. J. (1995). Damage by badgers Meles meles to wheat Triticum vulgare and barley Hordeum sativum crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sahlsten, J., Bunnefeld, N., Månsson, J., & Ericsson, G. (2010). Can supplementary feeding be used to redistribute moose? Wildlife Biology, 16, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saj, T., Sicotte, P., & Paterson, J. D. (1999). Influence of human food consumption on the time budget of vervets. International Journal of Primatology, 20, 977–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schmidt, K. T., & Hoi, H. (2002). Supplemental feeding reduces natural selection in juvenile red deer. Ecography, 25(3), 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strum, S. C. (2005). Measuring success in primate translocation: a baboon case study. American Journal of Primatology, 65, 117–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strum, S. C. (2010). The development of primate raiding: implications for management and conservation. International Journal of Primatology, 31, 133–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Doorn, A. C. (2009). The interface between socioecology and management of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) in the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. PhD thesis. University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  51. van Doorn, A. C., O’Riain, M. J., & Swedell, L. (2010). The effects of extreme seasonality of climate and day length on the activity budget and diet of semi-commensal chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) in the Cape Peninsula of South Africa. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 104–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Warren, Y., Higham, J. P., Maclarnon, M. A., & Ross, C. (2011). Crop-raiding and commensalism in olive baboons: The costs and benefits of living with humans. In V. Sommer & C. Ross (Eds.), Primates of Gashaka (Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects 35 (pp. 359–384). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Western Cape Nature Conservation (2000). Western Cape Nature Conservation Laws Amendment Act, Sections 25A-47, 43–54.Google Scholar
  54. Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., & Rabinowitz, A. R. (2005). The impact of human–wildlife conflict on natural systems. In R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood, & A. R. Rabinowitz (Eds.), People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence? (pp. 1–12). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bentley S. Kaplan
    • 1
  • M. Justin O’Riain
    • 1
  • Rowen van Eeden
    • 1
  • Andrew J. King
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.The Royal Veterinary CollegeHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations