Interpreting the Role of Climbing in Primate Locomotor Evolution: Are the Biomechanics of Climbing Influenced by Habitual Substrate Use and Anatomy?
- 386 Downloads
Vertical climbing is widely accepted to have played an important role in the origins of both primate locomotion and of human bipedalism. Yet, only a few researchers have compared climbing mechanics in quadrupedal primates that vary in their degree of arboreality. It is assumed that primates using vertical climbing with a relatively high frequency will have morphological and behavioral specializations that facilitate efficient climbing mechanics. We test this assumption by examining whether time spent habitually engaged in climbing influences locomotor parameters such as footfall sequence, peak forces, and joint excursions during vertical climbing. Previous studies have shown that during climbing, the pronograde and semiterrestrial Macaca fuscata differs in these parameters compared to the more arboreal and highly specialized, antipronograde Ateles geoffroyi. Here, we examine whether a fully arboreal, quadrupedal primate that does not regularly arm-swing will exhibit gait and force distribution patterns intermediate between those of Macaca fuscata and Ateles geoffroyi. We collected footfall sequence, limb peak vertical forces, and 3D hindlimb excursion data for Macaca fascicularis during climbing on a stationary pole instrumented with a force transducer. Results show that footfall sequences are similar between macaque species, whereas peak force distributions and hindlimb excursions for Macaca fascicularis are intermediate between values reported for M. fuscata and Ateles geoffroyi. These results support the notion that time spent climbing is reflected in climbing mechanics, even though morphology may not provide for efficient mechanics, and highlight the important role of arboreal locomotor activity in determining the pathways of primate locomotor evolution.
KeywordsBiomechanics Climbing Macaque Primate evolution Spider monkey
We thank 2 anonymous reviewers, Dr. Joanna Setchell, and several WVSOM faculty and students for providing helpful comments. We also thank Ms. Megan Wilson for assistance with data collection and Ms. Bobbi Hoover, Mr. Bobby Lee, and Mr. Ken Moon for assistance with data preparation. This project was supported by an NSF (BCS-0749314) and WVSOM Intramural grant. All procedures approved by the WVSOM and Duke IACUCs.
- Begun, D. R. (2004). Knuckle-walking and the origin of human bipedalism. In D. J. Meldrum (Ed.), From biped to strider: The emergence of modern human walking (pp. 9–33). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Cartmill, M. (1985). Climbing. In M. Hildebrand, D. M. Bramble, K. F. Liem, & D. B. Wake (Eds.), Functional vertebrate morphology (pp. 73–88). Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
- Fleagle, J. G. (1999). Primate adaptation and evolution (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Fleagle, J. G., Stern, J. T. J., Jungers, W. L., Susman, R. L., Vangor, A. K., & Wells, J. P. (1981). Climbing: a biomechanical link with brachiation and bipedalism. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 48, 359–375.Google Scholar
- Hanna, J. B., Everett, S., & Schmitt, D. (2010). Biomechanics of climbing in 4 species of prosimian, with special reference to lorises. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 151(S50), 122.Google Scholar
- Hirasaki, E., Matano, S., Nakano, Y., & Ishida, H. (1992). Vertical climbing in Ateles geoffroyi and Macaca fuscata and its comparative neurological background. In S. Matano, R. H. Tuttle, H. Ishida, & M. Goodman (Eds.), Evolutionary biology, reproductive endocrinology, and virology (pp. 156–165). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
- Hoelzer, G. A., & Melnick, D. J. (1996). Evolutionary relationships of the macaques. In J. E. Lindberg (Ed.), Evolution and ecology of macaque societies (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Larson, S. G. (1993). Functional morphology of the shoulder in primates. In D. Gebo (Ed.), Postcranial adaptation in nonhuman primates (pp. 45–69). DeKalb: NIU.Google Scholar
- Larson, S. G. (1998a). Unique aspects of quadrupedal locomotion in nonhuman primates. In E. Strasser, J. G. Fleagle, A. Rosenberger, & H. McHenry (Eds.), Primate locomotion: Recent advances (pp. 157–173). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
- Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa, G., Spurlock, L., Asfaw, B., & White, T. D. (2009). The pelvis and femur of Ardipithecus ramidus: the emergence of upright walking. Science, 326, 78–83.Google Scholar
- Rose, M. D. (1991). The process of bipedalization in hominoids. In Y. Coppens & B. Senut (Eds.), Origine(s) de la bipedie chez les hominides (pp. 37–49). Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
- Shinoda, K. (1994). Allometry of the long bones of closely related macaques. Anthropological Science, 102(Supplement), 11–25.Google Scholar
- Stern, J. T. (1971). Functional morphology of the hip and thigh of cebid monkeys and its implications for the evolution of erect posture. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
- Stern, J. T. (1975). Before bipedality. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 19, 59–68.Google Scholar
- Vangor, A. K. (1979). Electromyography of gait in non-human primates and its significance for the evolution of bipedality. Ph.D. thesis. State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar