Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1293–1309 | Cite as

Interchange of Grooming and Agonistic Support in Chimpanzees

  • N. F. Koyama
  • C. Caws
  • F. Aureli
Article

We investigated the temporal relationship between grooming given and agonistic support received in a group of chimpanzees at Chester Zoo, U.K. We compared grooming levels the day before a conflict-with-support to those the day before a conflict-without-support and to baseline to investigate whether individuals groom potential supporters in anticipation of the need for support. We also compared grooming and aggression levels the day after conflicts-with-support to levels the day after conflicts-without-support and to baseline levels to determine whether chimpanzees reward individuals that support them or punish those that do not. Finally, we compared grooming and aggression levels the day after conflicts-with-unsuccessful-solicitations-for-support to those the day after conflicts-with-support and to baseline to examine the behavioral consequences of not providing support when an individual had solicited but did not receive it. Future recipients of support groomed future supporters more the day before receiving support, compared to the day before conflicts-without-support, indicating that grooming increased the likelihood of support. The relationship between prior grooming and support held true only for aggressor and not victim support and is consistent with behavior expected if chimpanzees anticipated the need for agonistic support and groomed their supporter the day before to increase the likelihood of support. We found evidence of a system of reward and punishment. Individuals experienced significantly lower rates of aggression after conflicts in which they provided support than at baseline and after conflicts in which they did not provide support. The finding was true only for aggressor support. We found no evidence that chimpanzees punished individuals whom or that they unsuccessfully solicited with aggression or a reduction in grooming. However, solicitors groomed individuals that they solicited for support significantly more after unsuccessful solicitations than after individuals provided support (but with no difference from baseline), indicating that individuals may attempt to recement their relationship after an unsuccessful solicitation. The findings are consistent with a mechanism of calculated interchange in chimpanzees.

KEY WORDS

agonistic support anticipation chimpanzees grooming interchange 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Chester Zoo for financial support and assistance during data collection.

REFERENCES

  1. Altmann, J. (1974). Observational study of behaviour: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–265.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, K., and Whiten, A. (2001). Post-conflict behaviour of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. Behaviour 138: 649–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, K., and Whiten, A. (2003). Grooming interactions among the chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest, Uganda: Tests of the five explanatory models. Behaviour 140: 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, L., Henzi, S. P., Weingrill, T., Lycett, J. E., and Hill, R. A. (1999). Market forces predict grooming reciprocity in female baboons. Proc. R. Soc. B 266: 665–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biro, D., and Matsuzawa, T. (1999). Numerical ordering in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Planning, executing and monitoring. J. Comp. Psychol. 113(2): 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boysen, S. T., and Hallberg, K. I. (2000). Primate numerical competence: Contributions toward understanding nonhuman cognition. Cogn. Sci. 24(3): 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brosnan, S., and De Waal, F. B. M. (2002). A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Hum. Nat. 13(1): 129–152.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, R., and Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Call, J. (2001). Chimpanzee social cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5(9): 388–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Parker, G. A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373: 209–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex Among Apes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  12. De Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Food sharing and reciprocal obligations among chimpanzees. J. Hum. Evol. 18: 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Coalitions as part of reciprocal relations in the Arnhem chimpanzee colony. In Harcourt, A., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Coalitions and Alliance in Humans and Other Animals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 233–257.Google Scholar
  14. De Waal, F. B. M. (1997). The chimpanzee's service economy: Food for grooming. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18: 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Anim. Behav. 60: 253–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Waal, F. B. M., and Luttrell, L. M. (1988). Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: Symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? Ethol. Sociobiol. 9: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hemelrijk, C. (1990). Models of, and tests for, reciprocity, unidirectionality and other social interaction patterns at a group level. Anim. Behav. 39: 1013–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemelrijk, C. (1994). Support for being groomed in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Anim. Behav. 48: 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hemelrijk, C., and Ek, A. (1991). Reciprocity and interchange of grooming an 'support' in captive chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 41: 923–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Henzi, S. P., and Barrett, L. (1999). The value of grooming to female primates. Primates 40(1): 47–59.Google Scholar
  21. Henzi, S. P., Lycett, J. E., and Weingrill, T. (1997). Cohort size and the allocation of social effort by female mountain baboons. Anim. Behav. 54: 1235–1243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kawai, N., and Matsuzawa, T. (2000). Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee. Nature 403: 39–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koyama, N. F., and Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Anticipation of conflict by chimpanzees. Primates 37(1): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kutsukake, N., and Castles, D. L. (2004). Reconciliation and post-conflict third-party affiliation among wild chimpanzees in the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Primates 45: 157–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lazaro-Perea, C., Arruda, M. F., and Snowdon, C. T. (2004). Grooming as a reward? Social function of grooming between females in cooperatively breeding marmosets. Anim. Behav. 67: 627–636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Noë, R., and Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 175–179.Google Scholar
  27. Noë, R., van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1991). The market effect: An explanation for payoff asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology 87: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Packer, C. (1977). Reciprocal altruism in Papio anubis. Nature 265: 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preuschoft, S., Wang, X., Aureli, F., and de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Reconciliation in captive chimpanzees: A reevaluation with control methods. Int. J. Primatol. 23: 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schino, G. (2001). Grooming, competition and social rank among female primates: A meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 62: 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L. (1984). Grooming, alliances and reciprocal altruism in vervet monkeys. Nature 308: 541–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silk, J., Seyfarth, R., and Cheney, D. (1999). The structure of social relationships among female savanna baboons in Moremi Reserve. Behaviour 136: 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vervaecke, H., DeVries, H., and Van Elsacker, L. (2000). The pivotal role of rank in grooming and support behaviour in a captive group of bonobos (Pan panisus). Behaviour 137: 1463–1485.Google Scholar
  35. Watts, D. (2000). Grooming between male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park. II. Influence of male rank and possible competition for partners. Primates 41: 357–364.Google Scholar
  36. Watts, D. (2002). Reciprocity and interchange in the social relationships of wild male chimpanzees. Behav 139: 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wittig, R., and Boesch, C. (2003). “Decision-making” in conflicts of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): An extension of the relational model. Behav. Ecol. Scoiobiol. 54: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Earth SciencesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolU.K.
  2. 2.Education DivisionChester Zoo, Upton-by-ChesterChesterU.K.

Personalised recommendations