Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do the Demographic Differences Manifest in Motivation to Learn Science and Impact on Science Performance? Evidence from Sri Lanka

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined whether gender, ethnicity, instructional medium and school category differences manifest in science performance and motivation to learn science among secondary school students in Sri Lanka. The mean of five successive term test scores was used as the measure of science performance. Level of motivation in terms of six dimensions was measured by using the Science Motivation Questionnaire. A sample of 1316 grade 11 students representing Sinhala, Tamil, and Muslim ethnic groups from the three categories of public schools, which provide instructions in the vernacular languages of Sinhala or Tamil, participated in the study. Girls showed significantly higher performance in science compared to boys, and there was a significant gender difference in the levels of motivational dimensions in favor of girls. Although Tamil medium students possessed a higher level of motivation to learn science, Sinhala medium students outperformed their Tamil medium counterparts in science performance. Significant differences in science performance between Sinhala, Tamil, and Muslim students were also observed. However, motivation towards learning science between Tamils and Muslims was not significantly different. Highly significant differences in both motivation to learn science and performance in science were found between three categories of schools. The present study provides information to education officials who have to achieve equity across gender, ethnicity, medium of instruction, and school category, teachers who deliver the subject and school principals who design academic support programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adnan, K. A. N., & Akbas, A. (2006). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (attitude and self efficacy) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement-I. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuwape, M. O. (2011). Students' self-concept and their achievement in basic science. African Research Review, 5(4), 191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amunga, J. K., Amadalo, M. M., & Musera, G. (2011). Disparities in chemistry and biology achievement in secondary schools: Implications for vision 2030. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 226–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atta, M. A., & Jamil, A. (2012). Effects of motivation and parental influence on the educational attainments of students at secondary level. Academic Research International, 2(3), 427–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayub, N. (2010). Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance. Pakistan Business Review, 8, 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, V. R., Baumeister, A. A., & Furr, R. M. (2003). Racial and gender science achievement gaps in secondary education. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164(1), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for non-majors. Science Education, 83, 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2005). Evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management (pp. 9–35). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computers & Education, 56(3), 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, P. (2002). A deeper look at NAEP science results. ETS Policy Notes, 11, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, J. R., Borg, M. O., & Stranahan, H. A. (2012). Closing the achievement gap between high-poverty schools and low-poverty schools. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 5, 1–24.

  • Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 955–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270–295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., Blinkenstaff, J., & Walker, N. (2003). Students’ learning approaches, reasoning abilities, motivational goals and epistemological beliefs in differing college science courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 33, 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetin-Dindar, A., & Geban, Ö. (2010). The Turkish adaptation of the science motivation questionnaire. In M. F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: Pre-service and in-service teacher education (pp. 119–127). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi. 

  • Chapell, M. S., Blanding, Z. B, Silverstein, M. E., Takahashi, M., Newman, B., Gubi, A., & Mccann, N. (2005). Test anxiety and academic performance in undergraduate and graduate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 268–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.268.

  • Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school Students' motivation and achievement in combined science. Online Submission, 3(4), 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Examination. (2017). GCE (O/L) examination 2016 - performance of candidates. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Examination Department Press.

  • Ersoy, A. F., & Aliçka, Y. (2016). Motivation to learn in secondary school physics. Beder Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, M. (2009). Moving to secondary school: Initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on Education, 2(2009), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J. J. Mintzes & W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1088–1107. doi:10.1002/tea.20181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 127–146. doi:10.1002/tea.20267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science motivation questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffee, D. (1998, October). Can we validly translate questionnaire items from English to Japanese? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 2(1), 11-14. Retrieved from http://www.jalt.org/test/PDF/Griffee1.pdf.

  • Grigg, W., Lauko, M., & Brockway, D. (2006). The Nation’s Report Card Science 2005: Assessment of student performance in grades 4, 8, and 12 (NCES 2006–466). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2006). School resources. Handbook of the Economics of Education, 2, 865–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M., Yager, R., & De Vreese P. (2003, March). Increasing the relevance of science education. Paper presented at the NARST 2003 Annual International Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

  • Hon-Keung, Y., Man-shan, K., & Lai-fong, C. A. (2012). The impact of curiosity and external regulation on intrinsic motivation: An empirical study in Hong Kong education. Psychology Research, 2(5), 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlhaas, K., Lin, H. H., & Chu, K. L. (2010). Disaggregated outcomes of gender, ethnicity, and poverty on fifth grade science performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 33(7), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, P. Y., Chan, K. W., & Wong, K. Y. (2006). A study of intrinsic motivation, achievement goals and study strategies of Hong Kong Chinese secondary students. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Lavigne, G. L., Vallerand, R. J., & Miquelon, P. (2007). A motivational model of persistence in education: A self-determination theory approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaper, C., Farkas, T., & Brown, C. S. (2012). Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender-related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 268–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English–language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 171–197). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2002). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, M. Y., Yusuf, M., & Saleh, M. (2015). Motivation and engagement as a predictor of students’ science achievement satisfaction of Malaysian of secondary school students. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 5(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Glienke, B., & Burg, S. (2006). Gender and motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 351–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2016). School census preliminary reports 2016. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Government Press.

  • Miyake, A., Kost-Smith, L. E., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2010). Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: A classroom study of values affirmation. Science, 330(6008), 1234–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Education Research and Evaluation Centre. (2008). National Assessment of achievement of grade 8 students of 2007 in Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Colombo University Press.

  • National Education Research and Evaluation Centre. (2013). National assessment of achievement of grade 08 students in Sri Lanka - 2012. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Colombo University Press.

  • National Education Research and Evaluation Centre. (2015). National Assessment of achievement of students completing grade 8 in year 2014 in Sri Lanka. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Colombo University Press.

  • Nyamba, S. Y., & Mwajombe, K. K. (2012). Students’ preferences on science subjects: Does this affect their performance? A case of Udzungwa secondary school, Kilolo, Iringa, Tanzania. International Journal of Science and Technology, 2(8), 556–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrentz, S. (2012). Predictors of science success: The impact of motivation and learning strategies on college chemistry performance (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/epse_diss/77

  • Olatoye, R. A. (2009). Students’ test anxiety, motivation for examinations and science achievement in junior secondary schools in Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 1(10), 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olatoye, R. A., & Afuwape, M. O. (2003). Test anxiety as a determinant of examination misdemeanor among some Nigerian secondary school students. Ibadan Journal of Educational Studies, 3(182), 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oludipe, D. I. (2012). Gender difference in Nigerian junior secondary students’ academic achievement in basic science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(1), 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). London, UK: The Nuffield Foundation.

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-determination in intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusillo, M. T. C., & Arias, P. F. C. (2004). Gender differences in academic motivation of secondary school students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salta, K., & Koulougliotis, D. (2015). Assessing motivation to learn chemistry: Adaptation and validation of science motivation questionnaire II with Greek secondary school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 125–151). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: Science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1000–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solano-Flores, G., & Trumbull, E. (2003). Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Sharma, S. (1976). Cross-cultural measurement of anxiety. Cross-cultural anxiety, 1, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedman, L. (2009). The NAEP long-term trend assessment: A review of its transformation, use, and findings. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turingan, J. P., & Yang, Y. C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of self-regulated learning skills between Korean and Filipino college students. Asian Social Science, 5(12), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tüysüz, M., Yıldıran, D., & Demirci, N. (2010). What is the motivation difference between university students and high school students? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1543–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veloo, A., Hong, L. H., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Gender and ethnicity differences manifested in chemistry achievement and self-regulated learning. International Education Studies, 8(8), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinburgh, M. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and grade level as predictors of middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction Service. (ED442662).

  • Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 12(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, K. U. I., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeyer, A. (2010). Motivation to learn science and cognitive style. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(2), 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeyer, A., Çetin-Dindar, A., Md Zain, A. N., Juriševič, M., Devetak, I., & Odermatt, F. (2013). Systemizing: A cross-cultural constant for motivation to learn science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(9), 1047–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Leung, F. K. (2011). Motivation and achievement: Is there an east Asian model? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1189–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zusho, A., Pintrich, P. A., & Coppola, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1081–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Management, Management and Science University, University Drive, Seksyen 13, 40050, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

    Anthoni Durage Asoka De Silva, Ali Khatibi & S. M. Ferdous Azam

Authors
  1. Anthoni Durage Asoka De Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Khatibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. M. Ferdous Azam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthoni Durage Asoka De Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Silva, A.D.A., Khatibi, A. & Ferdous Azam, S.M. Do the Demographic Differences Manifest in Motivation to Learn Science and Impact on Science Performance? Evidence from Sri Lanka. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 16 (Suppl 1), 47–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9846-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9846-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation