Mathematics Learning Development: the Role of Long-Term Retrieval
This study assessed the relation between long-term memory retrieval and mathematics calculation and mathematics problem solving achievement among elementary, middle, and high school students in nationally representative sample of US students, when controlling for fluid and crystallized intelligence, short-term memory, and processing speed. As hypothesized, structural equation modeling comparing elementary school students and middle and high school students revealed that long-term retrieval skills became a better predictor of both mathematics calculation and mathematics problem solving as age and grade increased. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of interventions to improve long-term retrieval skills in general, and arithmetic facts retrieval and problem solving procedures in particular, at all grades, including high school.
KeywordsCalculation High school students Long-term retrieval Mathematics achievement Problem solving
The authors would like to thank Kathryn Nakagawa, Ph.D. and Kevin McGrew, Ph.D. for their valuable contributions.
- Baddeley, A. D. & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Calderón-Tena, C. O. (2015). Mathematical development: The role of broad cognitive processes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
- Gelman, R. & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/.
- Kearns, D. M. & Fuchs, D. (2013). Does cognitively focused instruction improve the academic performance of low-achieving students? Exceptional Children, 79, 263–290.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McGrew, K. S. & Wendling, B. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 651–675.Google Scholar
- Muthén, B. O. & Muthén, L. K. (2014). Mplus (Version 7.2) [Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- Newton, J. H. & McGrew, K. S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Current research in Cattell-Horn-Carroll-based assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 621–634.Google Scholar
- Schmiedek, F., Lövdén, M. & Lindenberger, U. (2014). Younger adults show long-term effects of cognitive training on broad cognitive abilities over 2 years. Developmental Psychology 50(9),2304-2310. doi: 10.1037/a0037388.
- Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S. & Mather, N. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III Normative Update (NU) Complete. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar