Advertisement

Development of a Computer-Based Measure of Listening Comprehension of Science Talk

  • Sheau-Wen Lin
  • Yu Liu
  • Shin-Feng Chen
  • Jing-Ru Wang
  • Huey-Lien Kao
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-based assessment for elementary school students’ listening comprehension of science talk within an inquiry-oriented environment. The development procedure had 3 steps: a literature review to define the framework of the test, collecting and identifying key constructs of science talk, and developing and verifying an instrument that measured listening comprehension of science talk. The Science Listening Comprehension Test (SLCT), consisting of 35 multiple-choice items, was developed for 3 science inquiry components: identifying questions, designing methods and presenting evidence, and drawing evidence-based conclusions. Students from grades 4 and 6 (N = 1,080) were recruited and selected through cluster sampling. The SLCT’s validity, reliability, and item parameters were found to be reasonable. Grade-related improvement in listening comprehension of science talk was observed, no significant gender difference was observed, and students’ listening comprehension of science talk was predictable with prior scientific knowledge and language ability measures. Instructional implications were discussed, and future research was outlined.

Key words

elementary students IRT science inquiry science listening comprehension test science talk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10763_2014_9559_MOESM1_ESM.docx (281 kb)
Figure 1 SLCT example items. The stem of each item was played by the sound player; only questions, movies, pictures, or tables and responses would show on the computer screen. The underlines indicate the correct answer (DOCX 281 kb)
10763_2014_9559_MOESM2_ESM.docx (64 kb)
Figure 2 Test information function (TIF; solid line) and standard error (SE; dotted line) based on 35 items of SLCT (DOCX 63 kb)

References

  1. Buck, G. (2004). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57–74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, H., Chen, C., Guo, G., Cheng, Y., Lin, C. & Jen, T. (2011). The development of a competence scale for learning science: Inquiry and communication. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1213–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lehto, J. E. & Anttila, M. (2003). Listening comprehension in primary level grades two, four and six. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin, B. G. & Chi, P. H. (2002). The development of the test of language comprehension. Bulletin of Special Education, 19, 105–125.Google Scholar
  6. Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 10(6), 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Macaro, E., Graham, S. & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Education (2006). Grade 1–9 curriculum of junior high and primary school: Science and technology. Taipei: Author.Google Scholar
  10. National Research Council (2000). In S. Olson & S. Loucks-Horsley (Eds.), Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  11. National Research Council (2012). In H. Quinn, H. A. Schweingruber & T. Keller (Eds.), A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ockey, G. J. (2007). Construct implications of including still image or video in computer-based listening test. Language Testing, 24(4), 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.
  14. Osterlind, S. J. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Owca, S., Pawlak, E. & Pronobis, M. (2003). Improving student academic success through the promotion of listening skills. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED478233).Google Scholar
  16. Reckase, M. D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B. & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science studies: Does it make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 875–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tracey, M. W. (2009). Design and development research: A model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, J. R. & Lin, S.W. (2009). Evaluating elementary and secondary school science learning environments in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 853–872.Google Scholar
  20. Wellington, J. & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Wolvin, A. D. & Coakley, C. G. (1996). Listening (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Yildirim, K., Yildiz, M., Ates, S. & Rasinski, T. (2010). Fifth-grade Turkish elementary school students’ listening and reading comprehension levels with regard to text types. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1879–1891.Google Scholar
  23. Yore, L. D. (2012). Science literacy for all: More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag! In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 5–23). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yore, L. D. (2013). Four decades, and counting, of language and science education research and another two decades of research questions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
  25. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L. & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yore, L. D. & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sheau-Wen Lin
    • 1
  • Yu Liu
    • 1
  • Shin-Feng Chen
    • 2
  • Jing-Ru Wang
    • 1
  • Huey-Lien Kao
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science EducationNational Pingtung University of EducationPingtungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of EducationNational Pingtung University of EducationPingtungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations