Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A CROSS-AGE STUDY OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS’ SCIENTIFIC HABITS OF MIND CONCERNING SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

In this study, we investigated elementary student teachers’ scientific habits of mind for a series of socioscientific issues, and compared their views with respect to academic performance and type of programme. The sample consisted of 1,600 student teachers from science education, mathematics education, primary teacher education and social science education programmes (100 student teachers from each grade) at a Turkish University in the fall semester of the 2010–2011 school year. The data were obtained from the Scientific Habits of Mind Survey consisting of 32 items which had been previously validated, in this setting. The findings suggested that the teacher education programmes need to help student teachers grasp better scientific thinking as measured via scientific habits of mind if they are to engage more effectively in decision-making and discussion of socioscientific issues in their classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M. & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albe, V. (2008a). Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17, 805–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albe, V. (2008b). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, E. R. M. & Turner, B. (1997). Introduction to the human dimensions of global change. Hands-on! Developing active learning modules on the human dimensions of global change. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayas, A., Özmen, H. & Çalık, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulunuz, M. (2012). Motivational qualities of hands-on science activities for Turkish preservice kindergarten teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(2), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. (2010). A critical evaluation of the university entrance examination (ÖSS) in Turkey: a two-edged sword. In B. Vlaardingerbroek & N. Taylor (Eds.), Getting into varsity—comparability, convergence and congruence (pp. 187–196). New York, NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calik, M. (2011). How did creating constructivist learning environment influence graduate students’ views? Energy, Education, Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 3(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calik, M. (2013). Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers’ self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2008). A critical review of the development of the Turkish science curriculum. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. 161–174). AW Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalik, M. & Coll, R. K. (2012). Investigating socioscientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalık, M. & Eames, C. (2012). The significance of national context: A comparison of environmental education in Turkey and New Zealand. Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalik, M., Özsevgeç, T., Ebenezer, J., Artun, H. & Küçük, Z. (2013). Effects of ‘environmental chemistry’ elective course via technology embedded scientific inquiry model on some variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Published online first at http://download.springer.com/static/pdf/763/art%253A10.1007%252Fs10956-013-9473-5.pdf?auth66=1384362847_535bbbc1511b80b21f4ab71e8807E9e&ext=.pdf, doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9473-5.

  • Campanario, J. M. (2002). The parallelism between scientists’ and students’ resistance to new scientific ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 1095–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., Lay, M. C. & Taylor, N. (2008). Scientists and scientific thinking: Understanding scientific thinking through an investigation of scientists views about superstitions and religious beliefs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K. & Taylor, N. (2004). Probing scientists’ beliefs: How open-minded are modern scientists? International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 757–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K. & Jones, A. (2003). The development of the chemistry attitudes and experiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 649–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. T., McCarty, B. J., Shaw, K. L. & Sidani-Tabbaa, A. (1993). Transitions from objectivism to constructivism in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioğlu, H., Demircioğlu, G. & Çalik, M. (2009). Investigating effectiveness of the storylines embedded within context based learning: A case for the periodic table. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 10, 241–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C. F. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, L. A. & Brenner, J. (2010). Increasing scientific literacy about global climate change through a laboratory-based feminist science course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 39(4), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gökdere, M. & Çalik, M. (2010). A cross-age study of Turkish students’ mental models: An “Atom” concept. Didactica Slovenica-Pedagoska Obzorja, 25(2), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimmer, M. R. & White, K. D. (1992). Nonconventional beliefs among Australian science and nonscience students. Journal of Psychology, 126(5), 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2006). Why we should prioritize learning about science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 6(3), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus non-integrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidman, G. (2012). Australia at the crossroads: A review of school science practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85, 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001b). ‘To trust or not to trust’—pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Sissel, A., Tonning, V. & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90, 632–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krnel, D., Glažar, S. S. & Watson, R. (2003). The development of the concept of “matter”: A cross-age study of how children classify materials. Science Education, 87, 621–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C., Östman, L. & Wickman, P.-O. (Eds.). (2007). Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium: Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luera, G. R. & Otto, C. A. (2005). Development and evaluation of an inquiry-based elementary science teacher education program reflecting current reform movements. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(3), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkins, J. J. & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oogarah-Pratap, B. (2008). Using a constructivist approach to assess trainee teachers’ understanding of health-related concepts. The International Journal of Learning, 15(7), 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patronis, T., Potari, D. & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, C. (2009). Using the deficit model, public debate model and co-production of knowledge models to interpret points of view of students concerning citizens’ participation in socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulmones, R. (2010). Linking students’ epistemological beliefs with their metacognition in a chemistry classroom. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S. L. & Barton, A. C. (2012). Should Great Lakes City build a new power plant? How youth navigate socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 541–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saad, R. & BouJaoude, S. (2012). The relationship between teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about science and inquiry and their classroom practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(2), 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2009a). Socioscientific issues in science education: Labels, reasoning, and transfer. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2009b). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saher, M. & Lindeman, M. (2005). Alternative medicine: A psychological perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1169–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1994). Conflict between mainstream science and STS in science education. In J. Solomon & G. Aikenhead (Eds.), STS education: International perspectives on reform (pp. 47–59). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., Durant, J. & Shortland, M. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Scientific literacy papers (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Department for External Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, M. S. (2010). Development of attitudes towards socioscientific issues scale for undergraduate students. Evaluation and Research in Education, 23(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, M. S., Sadler, T. D. & Yilmaz-Tuzun, O. (2010). Preservice science teachers’ informal reasoning about socioscientific issues: The influence of issue context. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2475–2495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W. M. (1999). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ültay, N. & Çalik, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 686–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, C. & Willis, D. (2008). The increasing significance of ethics in the bioscience curriculum. Journal of Biology Education, 42(3), 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. E. (1998). Is new technology a hazard to our health? A case study of mobile phones. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44(1), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. T. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio-scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L. (2001). Participating in program development: Standard F. In D. Siebert & W. McIntosh (Eds.), College pathways to the science education standards (pp. 18–22). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S. & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L. & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Teacher Education, Fatih Faculty of Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 61335, Turkey

    Muammer Çalik

  2. Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 61335, Turkey

    Burçin Turan

  3. Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Richard Kevin Coll

Authors
  1. Muammer Çalik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Burçin Turan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Kevin Coll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muammer Çalik.

Electronic supplementary material

Because of the page length limits, Tables 4–7 were placed on the online electronic supplementary material IJSME website.

ESM 1

(DOCX 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çalik, M., Turan, B. & Coll, R.K. A CROSS-AGE STUDY OF ELEMENTARY STUDENT TEACHERS’ SCIENTIFIC HABITS OF MIND CONCERNING SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 12, 1315–1340 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9458-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9458-0

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation