# THE COMPLEXITIES OF A LESSON STUDY IN A DUTCH SITUATION: MATHEMATICS TEACHER LEARNING

## Abstract

This study combines the Japanese lesson study approach and mathematics teachers’ professional development. The first year of a 4-year project in which 3 Dutch secondary school teachers worked cooperatively on introducing making sense of the calculus is reported. The analysis focusses on instrumental and relational student understanding of mathematical concepts and the transition between the conceptual embodiment and the operational symbolism of the calculus. This paper reports on 2 cycles of lesson studies that took place in the first project year, the first cycle focussing on the notion of the derivative (introduced for polynomials) and the second on trigonometry (as the concepts shift from ratios in a right-angled triangle to functions in the calculus). The lesson study cycles resulted in changes in the teachers’ educational goals and instructional strategies in relation to student understanding. However, the teachers’ desire to be good teachers, their perceived need to prepare students for standard examinations and their reluctance to use computers impeded their progress in developing a lesson study approach. The introduction of a Japanese lesson study approach into a Dutch context merits further reflection in the later years of the project.

## Key words

lesson study making sense of the calculus student understanding teachers’ professional development## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## REFERENCES

- Ambrose, R., Clement, L., Philipp, R. & Chauvot, J. (2004). Assessing prospective elementary school teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning: Rationale and development of a constructed-response-format beliefs survey.
*School Science and Mathematics, 104*(2), 56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education.
*Elementary School Journal, 90*, 499–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.),
*Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners*(pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar - Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften.
*Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9*(4), 469–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Blackett, N., & Tall, D. (1991). Gender and the versatile learning of trigonometry using computer software.
*Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,*Vol. 1, 144–151. Assisi, ItalyGoogle Scholar - Borovik, A. & Gardiner, T. (2007).
*Mathematical abilities and mathematical skills*. Manchester: The University of Manchester, MIMS.Google Scholar - Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000).
*How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school*. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar - Borko, H., Eisenhart, M., Brown, C. A., Underhill, R. G., Jones, D. & Agard, P. C. (1992). Learning to teach hard mathematics: Do novice teachers and their instructors give up too easily?
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23*(3), 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bruner, J. S. (1966).
*Towards a theory of instruction*. New York: Norton.Google Scholar - Carpenter, T. & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.),
*Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding*(pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Cerbin, W. & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching.
*International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18*(3), 250–257.Google Scholar - Davis, R. B. & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5*(3), 281–303.Google Scholar - Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development toward better conceptualizations and measures.
*Educational Researcher, 38*(3), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Desimone, L. (2011). A primer on effective professional development.
*Phi Delta Kappan, 92*, 68–71.Google Scholar - Fernandez, C. & Yoshida, M. (2004).
*Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Gravemeijer, K. (1994).
*Developing realistic mathematics education*. Utrecht: CD–B Press/Freudenthal Institute.Google Scholar - Hambleton, R. K. & Pitoniak, M. J. (2006). Setting performance standards. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.),
*Educational measurement*(4th ed.). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar - Hiebert, J. & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*(pp. 371–404). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.
*American Educational Research Journal, 42*(2), 371–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L. & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39*(4), 372–400.Google Scholar - Hohenwarter, M., Hohenwarter, J., Kreis, Y. & Lavicza, Z. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra.
*TSG 16*:*Research and development in the teaching and learning of calculus*,*ICME 11*, Monterrey, Mexico.Google Scholar - Ingaki, T., Terasaki, M. & Matsudaira, N. (Eds.). (1988).
*The life course of teachers*. Tokyo: Tokaidaigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar - Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P. & Simpson, A. (2007). Modelling mathematical argumentation: The importance of qualification.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66*(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Jaffe, A. & Quinn, F. (1993). Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics.
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29*(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Johnson, J. D. & Walker, M. (2011). Trigonometry students’
*knowing*when to use hand-held CAS technology to make sense of mathematics.*Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Mathematics Education, 6*(2), 17–33.Google Scholar - Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (2001).
*Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics*. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar - Krauss, S., Baumert, J. & Blum, W. (2008). Secondary mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs.
*ZDM, 40*(5), 873–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Levine, T. H. & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning.
*Teaching and Teacher Education, 26*, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lewis, C. C. (2002).
*Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change*. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar - Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study.
*Educational Researcher, 35*(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is the nature of knowledge development in lesson study?
*Educational Action Research, 17*(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lewis, C. C. & Hurd, J. (2011).
*Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction*. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar - Matoba, M., Shibata, Y., Reza, M. & Arani, S. (2007). School-university partnerships: A new recipe for creating professional knowledge in school.
*Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6*(2), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nakatome, T. (1984).
*Developing konaikenshu: A comprehensive study of management of Japanese konaikesnhu*. Tokyo: Eidell Kenkyousho.Google Scholar - Pérez, A. I., Soto, E. & Serván, M. J. (2010). Participatory action research and the reconstruction of teachers’ practical thinking: Lesson studies and core reflection. An experience in Spain.
*Educational Action Research, 18*(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Puchner, L. D. & Taylor, A. N. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups.
*Teaching and Teacher Education, 22*, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ross, J. A., Bruce, C. D. & Sibbald, T. (2011). Sequencing computer-assisted learning of transformations of trigonometric functions.
*Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 30*(3), 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Saito, E., Hawe, P., Hadiprawiroc, S. & Empedhe, S. (2008). Initiating education reform through lesson study at a university in Indonesia.
*Educational Action Research, 16*(3), 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006). What doesn’t work: The challenge and failure of the what works clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula.
*Educational Researcher, 35*(2), 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sims, L. & Walsh, D. (2009). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons.
*Teaching and Teacher Education, 25*(5), 724–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.
*Harvard Educational Review, 57*, 1–22.Google Scholar - Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.
*Mathematics Teaching, 77*, 20–26.Google Scholar - Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester (Ed.),
*Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning*. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar - Stepanek, J., Appel, G., Leong, M., Mangan, M. T. & Mitchell, M. (2007).
*Leading lesson study: A practical guide for teachers and facilitators*. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar - Tall, D. O. (2008a). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20*(2), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tall, D. O. (2008b). Using Japanese lesson study in teaching mathematics.
*Scottish Mathematical Council Journal, 38*, 45–50.Google Scholar - Tall., D.O. (2010). A sensible approach to the calculus. Plenary at
*The National and International Meeting on the Teaching of Calculus*, Puebla, Mexico.Google Scholar - Thurston, W. P. (1990). On proof and progress in mathematics.
*Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30*(2), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000).
*Mathematics Education in The Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute CD-ROM for ICME9*. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar - Verhoef, N. C., & Tall, D. O. (2011). Lesson study: The effect on teachers’ professional development.
*Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,*Vol. 4, 297–304. Turkey: University of Ankara.Google Scholar - Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S. & Richert, A. E. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representation of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.),
*Exploring teachers’ thinking*(pp. 104–124). London: Cassell.Google Scholar