Abstract
Upper secondary students’ task solving reasoning was analysed with a focus on arguments for strategy choices and conclusions. Passages in their arguments for reasoning that indicated the students’ beliefs were identified and, by using a thematic analysis, categorized. The results stress three themes of beliefs used as arguments for central decisions: safety, expectations and motivation. Arguments such as ‘I don’t trust my own reasoning’, ‘mathematical tasks should be solved in a specific way’ and ‘using this specific algorithm is the only way for me to solve this problem’ exemplify these three themes. These themes of beliefs seem to interplay with each other, for instance in students’ strategy choices when solving mathematical tasks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 950–967.
Ball, D. & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 27–44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Callejo, M. L. & Vila, A. (2009). Approach to mathematical problem-solving and students’ belief systems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 111–126.
Carlson, M. P. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics graduate students: Influences leading to mathematical success. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 237–258.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving. A new perspective (pp. 117–148). New York: Springer.
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J. & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4, 331–345.
Farmaki, V. & Paschos, T. (2007). The interaction between intuitive and formal mathematical thinking: A case study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(3), 353–365.
Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 11–50.
Frank, M. L. (1988). Problem solving and mathematical beliefs. Arithmetic Teacher, 35(5), 32–34.
Fransisco, J. M. & Hähkiöniemi, M. (2011). Students’ ways of reasoning about nonlinear functions in guess-my-rule games. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9310-3.
Furinghetti, F. & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver in unsuccessful in his or her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70, 71–90.
Furinghetti, F. & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In E. Pehkonen, G. C. Leder & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in Mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hannula, M.S. (2004). Affect in mathematical thinking and learning. PhD thesis, Finland: University of Turku.
Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematical thinking and learning: Towards integration of emotion, motivation and cognition. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New Mathematics Education Research and Practice (pp. 209–232). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hart, L. E. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 37–48). New York: Springer.
Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school. In E. Pehkonen, G. C. Leder & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in Mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 60–82.
Lerch, C. M. (2004). Control decisions and personal beliefs: Their effect on solving mathematical problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 361–372.
Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J. & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problem-solving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving. A new perspective (pp. 75–88). New York: Springer.
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.
Liu, P.-H. (2010). Are beliefs believable? An investigation of college students’ epistemological beliefs and behavior in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29(2), 86–98.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 575–596). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: The Council.
Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In Third Mediterranean conference on mathematics education (pp. 115–124).
Op’t Eyende, P., De Corte, E. & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(2), 189–206.
Philippou, G. N. & Christou, C. (1998). The effects of a preparatory mathematics program in changing prospective teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(2), 189–206.
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Prat-Sala, M. & Redford, P. (2010). The interplay between motivation, self-efficacy, and approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 283–305.
Presmeg, N. C. (1993). Mathematics—‘A bunch of formulas’? Interplay of beliefs and problem solving styles. In I. Hirabayashi, N. Nohda, K. Shigematsu & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th PME International Conference, 3 (pp. 57–64)
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Schoenfeld, A. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic.
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Sfard, A. (2001). There is more to discourse than meets the ears: Looking at thinking as communicating to learn more about mathematical learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 13–57.
Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9–15.
Speer, N. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(3), 361–391.
Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 127–146). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Vinner, S. (1997). The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 97–129.
Voigt, J. (1994). Negotiation of Mathematical Meaning and Learning Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 275–298.
Wong, N.-Y., Marton, F., Wong, K.-M. & Lam, C.-C. (2002). The lived space of mathematics learning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 25–47.
Wyndhamn, J. & Säljö, R. (1997). Word problems and mathematical reasoning—a study of children’s mastery of reference and meaning in textual realities. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 361–382.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sumpter, L. Themes and Interplay of Beliefs in Mathematical Reasoning. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 11, 1115–1135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9392-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9392-6