Advertisement

TEACHER’S REFLECTION OF INQUIRY TEACHING IN FINLAND BEFORE AND DURING AN IN-SERVICE PROGRAM: EXAMINATION BY A PROGRESS MODEL OF COLLABORATIVE REFLECTION

  • Minkee Kim
  • Jari Lavonen
  • Kalle Juuti
  • Jack Holbrook
  • Miia Rannikmäe
Article

Abstract

In inquiry-based science education, there have been gradual shifts in research interests: the nature of scientific method, the debates on the effects of inquiry learning, and, recently, inquiry teaching. However, many in-service programs for inquiry teaching have reported inconsistent results due to the static view of classroom inquiries and due to the partial perspective between individual and collaborative reflections. Thus, by means of a theoretical progress model of collaborative reflection, this qualitative research aims to investigate reflections of four participant teachers before and during a half-year in-service teacher program. The model captures the following four interactions for each individual teacher and among the teacher cohort: belief to practice, practice to belief, stimulation, and reinforcement. The audio–video data and their quantification allowed identification of the teachers’ consistent prior beliefs and practices as a multiplicity of inquiry teaching and their interwoven progress during the program. The findings are further discussed in terms of the implicit development and the richer repertoire.

KEY WORDS

collaborative reflection inquiry teaching teacher belief teacher practice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

10763_2012_9341_MOESM1_ESM.doc (570 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 570 kb)

References

  1. Anderson, R. D. & Mitchener, C. P. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 3–44). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L. & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S. & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bianchini, J. A. & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop, R. (2005). Freeing ourselves from neocolonial domination in research: A Kaupapa Mãori approach to creating knowledge. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 109–138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Carin, A. A., Bass, J. E. & Contant, T. L. (2004). Teaching science as inquiry (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Cobb, P., Zhao, Q. & Dean, C. (2010). Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Falk, J. K. & Drayton, B. (2009). MSPnet: Design dimensions for nested learning communities. Creating and sustaining online professional learning communities (pp. 17–46). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  13. Fazio, X. (2009). Teacher development using group discussion and reflection. Reflective Practice, 10(4), 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gengarelly, L. & Abrams, E. (2009). Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 74–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harford, J. & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R. & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Husu, J., Toom, A. & Patrikainen, S. (2008). Guided reflection as a means to demonstrate and develop student teachers’ reflective competencies. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 9(1), 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson, M. A. & Lawson, A. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kask, K., Rannikmäe, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2008). A paradigm shift in science teaching - Teacher development for inquiry teaching. In J. Holbrook, M. Rannikmäe, P. Reiska, & P. Isley (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for Post-Soviet societies: Research and practice (Estonian example) (pp. 47–66). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavonen, J., & Laaksonen, S. (2009). Context of teaching and learning school science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 922–944.Google Scholar
  24. Linn, M. C. (2009). Foreword. In J. K. Falk & B. Drayton (Eds.), Creating and sustaining online professional learning communities. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  25. Linn, M. C., Clark, D. & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mansvelder-Longayroux, D. D., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGee, A. & Lawrence, A. (2009). Teacher educators inquiring into their own practice. Professional Development in Education, 35(1), 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Money, A. G. & Agius, H. (2008). Video summarisation: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 19(2), 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, T. H. (2009). Teachers’ collaborative inquiry and professional growth: Should we be optimistic? Science Education, 93(3), 548–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world: Volume 1. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  32. Ogle, D. M. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Penick, J. E., Crow, L. W. & Bonnstetter, R. J. (1996). Questions are the answer: A logical questioning strategy for any topic. The Science Teacher, 63(1), 27–29.Google Scholar
  35. Shireen, J. M. & Czerniak, C. M. (2003). Study of science teachers’ attitudes toward and beliefs about collaborative reflective practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 157–224). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, A. R., Jones, M. G., Broadwell, B. & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists’ and teachers’ perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058–1075. doi: 10.1002/sce.20272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tillema, H. H. (2000). Belief change towards self-directed learning in student teachers: Immersion in practice or reflection on action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tobin, K., Tippins, D. J. & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K. & Cripps, C. J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary–secondary school transition. Canberra, Australia: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  41. Uhrich, T. A. (2009). The hierarchy of reflective practice in physical education. Reflective Practice, 10(4), 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vaino, K. (2009). Identifying chemistry teacher’s beliefs. Science Education International, 20(1/2), 32–43.Google Scholar
  43. Wellington, J. (1989). Skills and processes in science education: An introduction. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Skills and processes in science education (pp. 5–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Yoon, H.-G. & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minkee Kim
    • 1
  • Jari Lavonen
    • 2
  • Kalle Juuti
    • 2
  • Jack Holbrook
    • 3
  • Miia Rannikmäe
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.The University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.The University of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations