Skip to main content
Log in

THE POWER OF LEARNING GOAL ORIENTATION IN PREDICTING STUDENT MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The teaching and learning of mathematics in schools has drawn tremendous attention since the education reform in Taiwan. In addition to assessing cognitive abilities, Taiwan Assessment of Student Achievement in Mathematics (TASA-MAT) collects background information to help depict average student achievement in schools in an educational context. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between student achievement in mathematics and student background characteristics. The data for this study was derived from the sample for the 2005 TASA-MAT Sixth-Grade Main Survey in Taiwan. The average age of the sixth-grade students in Taiwan is 11 years old, as was the sample for the 2005 TASA-MAT. Student socioeconomic status (SES) and student learning-goal orientation were specified as predictor variables of student performance in mathematics. The results indicate that the better performance in mathematics tended to be associated with a higher SES and stronger mastery goal orientation. The SES factor accounted for 4.98% of the variance, and student learning-goal orientation accounted for an additional 10.61% of the variance. The major implication obtained from this study was that goal orientation was much more significant than SES in predicting student performance in mathematics. In addition, the Rasch model treatment of the ordinal response-category data is a novel approach to scoring the goal-orientation items, with the corresponding results in this study being satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43, 357–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, K.E. & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feed-back conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 171–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-theories. Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group.

  • Dweck, C.S. & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychology Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, E.S. & Dweck, C.S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, E.F., Stancavage, F.B., & Dossey, J.A. (1998). School policies and practices affecting instruction in mathematics: Findings for the national assessment of education progress. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES 98–495.

  • Masters, G.N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J.L. & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L. & Anderman, E. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P.R. & Schunk, D.H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuan-Ju Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, CJ., Hung, PH., Lin, SW. et al. THE POWER OF LEARNING GOAL ORIENTATION IN PREDICTING STUDENT MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 7, 551–573 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9132-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9132-0

Keywords

Navigation