Advertisement

The Application of an Adaptive, Web-based Learning Environment on Oxidation-reduction Reactions

  • Zangyuan Own
Article

Abstract

The World Wide Web is increasingly being used as a vehicle for flexible learning, where learning is seen to be free from time, geographical, and participation constraints. In addition to flexibility, the Web facilitates student-centered approaches, creating a motivating and active learning environment. The purpose of this study is to set up an adaptive learning environment on Internet and to experiment with the most suitable methods and applications. Our goal is to provide a better solution with regard to the related distance learning research. All the resources and background are from current relevant documents on the theory of asynchronous distance education. We set up an adaptive Internet learning system based on learning theory and related learning models. Our research targets are those students who took the ‘life chemistry’ course for the asynchronous distance education environment at Providence University in Taiwan. The students were divided randomly into two groups: the experimental group, which was in an adaptive learning environment, and the controlled group, which was in a non-adaptive one. We used the American Chemistry Society test bank as our research tool and used SPSS to analyse the data we obtained. Results show that the experimental group in the adaptive learning environment out-performs the controlled group. In addition, those students who are field independent learning types, have higher pre-knowledge, are male, in science departments and have a longer study time span in an adaptive learning environment show much greater achievement levels than those in the opposite situations.

Key words

adaptive learning chemistry education distance education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beasley, R.E. & Waugh, M.L. (1996). The effect of content-structure focusing on learner structural knowledge acquisition, retention, and disorientation in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 271–281.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, J., Stern, M. & Haugsjaa, E. (1996a). Applications of AI in education. Available at http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds-1/aied.html. Cited October 1998.
  3. Beck, J., Stern, M. & Woolf, B. (1996b). An intelligent multimedia based tutoring system for mathematics learning. Available at http://rastelli.cs.umass.edu/~ckc/projects/math/papers/edmedia96/edmedia96.html. Cited October 1998.
  4. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, N.J. (1990). Self-perceived computer proficiency, computer attitudes, and computer attributions as predictors of enrollment in college computer courses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA, 16–20 April, ERIC document reproduction service no. ED317618.Google Scholar
  6. Chandran, S., Treagust, D.F. & Tobin, K.G. (1987). The role of cognitive factors in chemistry achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, Z. (1995). What is constructed theory? Constructing and teaching. http://scied.ncue.edu.tw/ct/v3.htm. Cited October 1995 (in Chinese).
  8. Chen, M. (2000). The e-learning design project of physical education. The research project of NTTU physical education online course. National Tainan Teacher College, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Collins, A. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Technical report No. 474, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  10. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17–41.Google Scholar
  11. Dochy, F.J.R.C. (1994). Investigating the use of knowledge profiles in a flexible learning environment: Analyzing student, prior knowledge states. In: S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, H. Mandl (Eds.), Technology-base learning environments: Psychological and educational foundations (pp. 235–242). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Dong, J. (2000). Effect of multimedia computer assisted learning process to the learning achievement of earth science course. 16th Taiwan science education conference paper, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, D.M. & Hardman, L. (1989). Lost in hyperspace: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypermedia environment. In McAleese, R. (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
  14. Elizabeth, H.H. & Michael, P. (1991). Relationship between students, conceptual knowledge and study strategies – part 2: Student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fletcher, J.D. & Atkinson, R.C. (1972). Evaluation of the Stanford CAI program in initial reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 597–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenfield, P.M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the development of everyday life. In Rogoff, B. Lave, J. (Eds.), Everyday cognition and its development in social context (pp. 95–116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Guo, Z. (1992). The improvement of science education from the constructed theory point, Science Development Journal Monthly, 20(5), 548–570 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Hativa, N. & Shorer, D. (1989). Socieoeconomic status, aptitude, and gender differences in CAI gains of arithmetic. Journal of Education and Research, 83(1), 11–21.Google Scholar
  19. Hong, S. (2000). The study and design of WWW learning process tracking system. Thesis, National Tainan Teacher College, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Jacobson, M., Maouri, C., Mishra, P. & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4(4), 321–364.Google Scholar
  21. Jonassen, D.H. (1986). Hypertext principles for text and courseware design. Educational Psychologist, 21(4), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, D. (2001). The study and application of situated learning on oxidation and reduction web environment. Thesis, Providence University, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Liao, K. (1999). The study of affecting factors of organic stereochemistry and problem solving models. Dissertation, National Tainan Teacher College, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Lin, F. (2001). The study of constructed concept teaching on chemical reaction web titles. Thesis, Providence University, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  25. Lin, S. (1994). The study of relationship between the learning achievement of high school students and their different field styles. Educational Research Journal, 5, 81–112. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  26. Liu, H. (1996). The study of constructed theory view and its meaning on the science education. Science Educational Journal Monthly, 193, 6–22. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  27. Lou, Y. (2001). The application of scaffolding theory on the water chemistry web title. Thesis, Providence University, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  28. Ma, D. (1996). The study of field independent character students on WWW searching results. Thesis, NKTU, Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  29. McDonald, S. & Stevenson, R.J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
  30. Niaz, M. (1989). Translation of algebraic equations and its relation to formal operational reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(9), 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roblyer, M.D. (1988). The effectiveness of microcomputers in education. Technological Horizons in Education, 16(2), 85–89.Google Scholar
  32. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Romero, J.E., Tepper, B.J., Tetrault, L.A. (1992). Development and validation of new scales to measure Kolb's (1985) learning style dimensions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Su, Y. (1995). The effectiveness of learning results in science course by the teaching model of fundamental school teacher and the student's knowledge style. Fundamental Educational Research Combination Journal, 3, 63–78. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  35. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Wei, P. (1995). The effect of different interface model and personalized research results in the hyper media information system. Proceedings of the fourth ICCAI conference, S21–27 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  37. Wen, J. & Wu, M. (2000). The practical application and educational theory in the new computerized generation. Taipei, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  38. Witkin, H.A. & Goodenough, D.R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 661–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood, D., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu, M. (1998). The message of computer network learning and its related problem. News of computer center of Taiwan educational department, Taiwan, vol. 9, pp. 23–39 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  41. Yang, K. (1996). The relationship of knowledge style and science learning achievement (I) and (II). Science Educational Journal, 194, 2–12; and 195, 16–23 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Science Council, Taiwan 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied ChemistryProvidence UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations