The Application of 3D Rain Scatter Model on Horizontally Polarized SHF Signal Propagation in Tropical Location

  • J. S. Ojo
  • R. C. Okeowo


This paper presents some results of intersystem interference as a result of hydrometeor scattering on horizontally polarized SHF signal propagation in the tropical environment using the 3D rain cell model. The cumulative distribution of transmission loss has been based on the distance dependence (terrestrial station to the center of the common volume distance); frequency dependence and antenna gain dependence. Though there is a less interference (significantly higher transmission loss) at a relatively higher frequency of 20 and 34.8 GHz, the rain-scatter interference problem may not be negligible for a tropical region with high rainfall rate because, for a small percentage of time, the rain scatter power can be received even at a large distance from an interfering station.


3D rain scatter model Horizontally polarized SHF signals Tropical environment Common volume Interference 



The authors will like to thank Professors Capsoni and Paraboni, and Dr. D’Amico all of the Politecnico di Milano for the use of 3D Algorithm used in the study. They are also grateful to Professor M.O Ajewole for his useful discussions.


  1. 1.
    C. Capsoni, F. Fedi, C. Magistroni, A. Paraboni, and A. Pawlina, “Data and theory for a new model of the horizontal structure of rain cells for propagation applications,” Radio Sci. 22(3), 395–404 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. O. Ajewole, and J. S. Ojo, “Intersystem interference due to hydrometeor scattering on satellite downlink signal in tropical locations,” African J. of Science and Technology UNESCO (AJST) 6(2), 84–93 (2005a).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Awaka, “A 3D rain cell model for the study of interference due to hydrometeor scattering,” J. Comm. Res. Lab. 36(147), 13–44 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Capsoni, and M. D’Amico, “A physically based simple prediction method for scattering interference,” Radio Sci. 32(20), 397–407 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Capsoni, A. Paraboni, L. Ordano, D. Tarducci, F. Barbaliscia, A. Martellucci, and J. P. V. Poiares Baptisa, “Study of interference by rain scatter,” ESA J. 16(2), 171–192 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. R. Holts, R. McGuinness, D. G. Charlton, and P. T. Thompson, “The development of a model to estimate the bistatic transmission loss associated with intersystem interference,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. AP. 41(10), 1431–1442 (1993).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Commission of the European Communities on Cooperation in the Fields of Scientific and Technical Research, COST Project 210 campaign, Final Rept. EUR 13407EN –C ISBN 92-826-2400-5 Brussels, (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. O. Ajewole, and J. S. Ojo, “Comparative study of bistatic intersystem interference in low latitude tropical location,” J. of Research Science Managt. 3(1), 41–49 (2005b).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. O. Ajewole, L. B. Kolawole, and G. O. Ajayi, “Evaluation of bistatic intersystem interference due to scattering by hydrometeors on tropical paths,” Int. J. Satell. Commun. 17, 339–356 (1999a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Ojo, and C. I. Joseph-Ojo, “An estimate of interference effect on horizontally polarized signal transmission in the tropical locations: a comparison of rain-cell models,” Prog. Electromagn. Res. C. 6, 67–79 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. O. Adimula, and G. O. Ajayi, “Variation in raindrop size distribution an specific interference between terrestrial and satellite radio links,” Ann. Telecomm. 51(1-2), 78–93 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. K. McCarthy, J. E. Allnutt, W. E. Salazar, E. C. Omeata, B. R. Owolabi, T. Oladiran, E. B. Ojeba, G. O. Ajayi, T. I. Raji, and C. Zaks, “Results of 11.6 GHz radiometric experiment in Nigeria,” Electron. Lett. 30(17), 1452–1453 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. O. Ajayi, and R. L. Olsen, “Modeling of a topical raindrop size distribution for microwave and millimeter wave applications,” Radio Sci. 20(20), 193–202 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. J. Fang, and C. H. Chen, “Propagation of centimeter/millimeter waves along a slant path through precipitation,” Radio Sci. 17(5), 989–1005 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Moupfouma, and F. Tiffon, “Raindrop size distribution from microwave scattering measurements in equatorial and tropical climates,” Electron. Lett. 18(23), 1012–1014 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. O. Ajayi, and I. E. Owolabi, “Rainfall parameters from distrometer dropsize measurements at a tropical station,” Ann. Telecomm. 42(1-2), 4–12 (1987).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. O. Ajewole, L. B. Kolawole, and G. O. Ajayi, “Theoretical study of the effect of different types of tropical rainfall on microwave and millimeter-wave propagation,” Radio Sci. 34(5), 1103–1124 (1999b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. O. Ajayi, and F. Barbaliscia, “Prediction of attenuation due to rain: characteristics of the 0° isotherm in temperate and tropical climates,” Int. J. Satellite Commun. 8, 187–196 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ITU-R, Rec. P 836-1, Water vapour surface density and total columnar content, ITU Geneva, 1997.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. S. Ray, “Broadband complex refractive indices of ice and water,” Appl. Opt. 11(8), 1811–1836 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsFederal University of TechnologyAkureNigeria
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsCollege of EducationIkere-EkitiNigeria

Personalised recommendations