Support Vector Driven Genetic Algorithm for the Design of Circular Polarized Microstrip Antenna

  • Narendra Chauhan
  • Ankush Mittal
  • M. V. Kartikeyan


In this paper, a hybrid soft computing method for designing specific microstrip antenna is presented. Evolutionary algorithm such as genetic algorithm (GA) is one of the promising ways of finding global optimum solution from a multivariate nonlinear feature space. Being a stochastic iterative algorithm, it requires much computation power when the function to be optimized is complex and time consuming. Various meta-modelling techniques such as neural network, response surface methods, kriging, etc. can be used to model the process under optimization in order to reduce the computational expenses. In this paper, we investigate one such technique – support vector regression (SVR) – to model the complex analytical process. The model, thus obtained, is used for optimization using genetic algorithms. This approach is demonstrated for the design of circular polarized microstrip antenna at 2.6 GHz band. The results of SVR model are compared with other meta-models generated with neural network and response surface methodology.


Support vector regression Genetic algorithms Microstrip antennas 


  1. 1.
    D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithm in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. (Addison-Wisley, Reading, MA, 1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. M. Clarke, J.H. Griebsch, and T.W. Simpson, Analysis of Support Vector Regression for Approximation of Complex Engineering Analysis, Journal of Mechanical Design, ASME, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Nandi, Y. Badhe, J. Lonari, U. Sridevi, B.S. Rao, S.S. Tambe, and B.D. Kulkarni, Hybrid process modeling and optimization strategies integrating neural network/Support vector regression and genetic algorithms: study of benzene isopropylation on Hbeta catalyst. Chem. Eng. J 97, 115–129 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    IE3D: MoM-Based EM Simulator, Zeland’s Software Inc, Release 10.2, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Cristianini, and J. Shawe-Taylor, An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Smola, and B. Schölkopf, “A tutorial on support vector regression,” (Technical Report NC2-TR-1998–030), NeuroCOLT2, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.R. Gunn, “Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression,” Technical Report, May 1998.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory. (Wiley, New York, 1998).MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Cortes, and V. Vapnik, Support Vector Networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995).MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. J. C. Burges, A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2(2), 121–167 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Kumar, and M. V. Kartikeyan, A Circular Polarized Stacked Patch Apperture Coupled Microstrip Antenna for 2.6 GHz Band. Int. J. Infrared Milli. Waves 28(1), 13–23 (2007).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.M. Pozar, A Review of Aperture Coupled Microstrip Antennas: history, Operation, Development and applications,” 1996.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. L. Wong, and J. Y. Wu, Single Fed Small Circularly Polarized Square Microstrip Antenna. Electron. Lett. 33(22), 1833–1834 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. M. Pozar, Microstrip Antenna. IEEE Proc. 80(1), 79–91 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Garg, P. Bharti, I. Bahl, and A. Ittipiboon, Microstrip Antenna Design Handbook. (Aartech House, London, UK, 2001).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. R. Gunn, Support vector regression-Matlab toolbox. (Univ. Southampton, Southampton, U.K., 1999).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Haykin, Neural Network: A Comprehensive Foundation, Second Edition, Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. E. P. Box, and N. R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. (Wiley, New York, 1987).MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. Jolly, M. A. Jabbar, and L. Qinghua, Design Optimization of Permanent Magnet Motors Using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithms. IEEE. Transact. Magnet. vol. 41, no. 10, 2005. October.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. S. Keerthi, Efficient Tuning of SVM Hyperparameters Using Radius/Margin Bound and Iterative Algorithms, IEEE Transac Neural Networks 13(5), September 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narendra Chauhan
    • 1
  • Ankush Mittal
    • 1
  • M. V. Kartikeyan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Computer EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations