Advertisement

Noise Temperature Increase Effect on Total Outage Analysis of an Interfered Satellite Link

  • Vassileios K. Sakarellos
  • Athanasios D. Panagopoulos
  • John D. Kanellopoulos
Article

Abstract

The ever increasing demand for bandwidth and multimedia services has led to the employment of Ka and V band in modern satellite communication networks. In these frequency bands, rain attenuation is the most dominant fading mechanism deteriorating the performance of the Earth-space links. Moreover, interference due to propagation phenomena increases the outage time of the satellite links and should be taken into account for the reliable design of a satellite communication network. In this paper, a physical propagation model for the prediction of carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio statistics of a broadband satellite link incorporating the receiver noise temperature increase due to rain, is presented The obtained numerical results highlight the significance of the latter effect and investigate the impact of various operational, geometrical and climatic parameters in the total outage analysis. Some simple mathematical formulas for the prediction of the carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio, based on the above theoretical results, are also presented.

Keywords

Adjacent satellite interference Rain attenuation Noise temperature increase Convective rain cell model 

References

  1. 1.
    A.D. Panagopoulos, P.M. Arapoglou, P.G. Cottis, Satellite Communications at Ku, Ka and V bands, Propagation Impairments and Mitigation Techniques, in IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials, 3rd Quarter, October 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Castanet L., A. Bolea-Alamañac, M. Bousquet "Interference and Fade Mitigation Techniques for Ka and Q/V band satellite communication systems", COST 272–280 International workshop on Satellite Communications from Fade Mitigation to Service Provision, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, May 2003, pp. 241–248.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. D. Kanellopoulos, A. D. Panagopoulos and S. N. Livieratos, A comparison of co-polar and co-channel satellite interference prediction models with experimental results at 11.6 GHz and 20 GHz. Int. Jour. of Sat. Commun. 18, 107–120 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Matricciani, E. and M. Mauri, Cochannel interference in satellite communication systems derived from rain attenuation measurements at 20 GHz, Int. J. Sat. Commun. 14, 71–76, (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Matricciani, Copolar and cochannel interference during rain at 11.6 GHz estimated from radar measurements. Int. J. Sat. Commun. 15, 65–71, (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. D. Kanellopoulos and S. N. Livieratos, Analysis of the total carrier-to-noise plus interference ratio statistics applied to adjacent satellite interference under the presence of rain. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 4, 527–552, (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. H. Lin, A method for calculating rain attenuation distribution on microwave paths. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 54, 1051–1086, (1975).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. D. Panagopoulos and J. D. Kanellopoulos, Adjacent Satellite Interference Effects as applied to the Outage Performance of an Earth-Space System located in a Heavy Rain Climatic Region. Ann. Telecommun. 910, 925–942, (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. D. Panagopoulos, P. M. Arapoglou, J. D. Kanellopoulos and P. G. Cottis, Long Term Rain Attenuation Probability and Site Diversity Gain Prediction Formulas. IEEE. Trans. Antennas. Propag. 53, 2307–2313, July (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    France-Italy-ESA-Canada, Testing Analysis of Site Diversity Prediction Methods for Earth-Space paths at Ku and Ka bands. ITU-R WP3M Contribution 213, Geneva, April, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. S. Alouini, S. A. Borgsmiller, and P. G. Steffes, Channel Characterization and Modeling for Ka-Band Very Small Aperture Terminals. Proc. IEEE. 85, 981–997 June (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. K. Crane, Propagation Handbook for Wireless Communication System Design, (CRC Press LLC, 2003).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. D. Kanellopoulos and A. D. Panagopoulos, Ice Crystals and Raindrop Canting Angle affecting the Performance of a Satellite System suffering from Differential Rain Attenuation and Cross-Polarization. Radio Sci. 36, 927–940, (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Papoulis, Probability Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1991).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ITU-R Recommendation P.837-4, Characteristics of precipitation for propagation modeling, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ITU-R Recommendation P.838-2, Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ITU-R Recommendation S.465-5 Reference earth-station radiation pattern for use in coordination and interference assessment in the frequency range from 2 to about 30 GHz, 1994.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. D. Jacobs, The State of Art in Numerical Analysis, (Academic Press, London, 1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vassileios K. Sakarellos
    • 1
  • Athanasios D. Panagopoulos
    • 1
  • John D. Kanellopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Wireless & Satellite Communications Group, Division of Information Transmission Systems and Materials Technology, School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensZografouGreece

Personalised recommendations