Advertisement

International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 536–547 | Cite as

Imposed and Home-Grown Colonial Institutions: The Jesuit Chapels of St. Mary’s City and St. Francis Xavier, Maryland

  • James G. Gibb
  • Scott D. Lawrence
Article
  • 295 Downloads

Abstract

We compare the settings and architecture of a small, community based church in Maryland (US), to that of the Jesuit church in the colony’s capital, St. Mary’s City. The State of Maryland researches and interprets St. Mary’s City, while the parish of St. Francis Xavier supports the search for its first sanctuary. We explore the differences between the sites and their institutions sponsoring the studies, and reflect on what these differences might mean for the relationship of church and state in twenty-first-century Maryland.

Keywords

Church archaeology Community archaeology Religious communities Colonial Maryland 

References

  1. Beisaw, A. M. (2009). Constructing institution-specific site formation models. In Beisaw, A. M., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.), The Archaeology of Institutional Life, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp. 49–66.Google Scholar
  2. Beisaw, A. M., and Gibb, J. G. (eds.) (2009). The Archaeology of Institutional Life, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  3. Beitzell, E. W. (1960). The Jesuit Missions of St. Mary’s County, Maryland, E. W. Beitzell, Abell, MD.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, L. G., Menard, R. R., and Walsh, L. S. (1991). Robert Cole’s World: Agriculture and Society in Early Maryland, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Carson, C., Barka, N. F., Kelso, W. M., Stone, G. W., and Upton, D. (1981). Impermanent architecture in the southern American colonies. Winterthur Portfolio 16: 135–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibb, J. G., and Beisaw, A. M. (2000). Learning cast up from the mire: archaeological investigations of schoolhouses in the northeastern United States. Northeast Historical Archaeology 29: 107–129.Google Scholar
  7. Gibb, J. G., Lawrence, S. D., and Quantock, P. C. (2012). Search for Newtowne Chapel (18ST859), Newtown Neck, Leonardtown, St. Mary’s County, Maryland, Gibb Archaeological Consulting, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
  8. Gibb, J. G., Lawrence, S. D. and Hall, V. M. J. (2013). Discovering St. Francis Xavier Chapel (18ST859), Newtowne Neck, Leonardtown, St. Mary’s County, Maryland. On file at the Maryland Historical Trust, Crownsville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, T. (1908). The History of the Society of Jesus in North America, Colonial and Federal, Volume I, Part I, Burrows Brothers, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
  10. Land Records of St. Mary’s County. (1661). Land records available at the Maryland State Archives, Annapolis.Google Scholar
  11. Leone, M. P., and Hurry, S. D. (1998). Seeing: the power of town planning in the Chesapeake. Historical Archaeology 32(4): 34–62.Google Scholar
  12. Leone, M. P., Stabler, J., and Burlaga, A. M. (1998). A street plan for hierarchy: an analysis of state circle as a geometric form. In Shackel, P. A., Mullins, P. R., and Warner, M. S. (eds.), Annapolis Pasts: Historical Archaeology in Annapolis, Maryland, University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, pp. 291–306.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, H. M. (1988). Baroque cities in the wilderness: archaeology and urban development in the colonial Chesapeake. Historical Archaeology 22(2): 57–73.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, H. M. and King, J. A. (eds.) (1988). Exploring a “splendid and delightsome” land: research on the seventeenth century Chesapeake. Historical Archaeology 25(2): 1–3.Google Scholar
  15. Pyszka, K. (2013). “Built for the publick worship of God, according to the Church of England”: Anglican landscapes and colonialism in South Carolina. Historical Archaeology 47(4): 1–22.Google Scholar
  16. Reps, J. W. (1972). Tidewater Towns: City Planning in Colonial Virginia and Maryland, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
  17. Riseling Jr., G. F. (2013). The St. Francis Xavier cemetery (18ST859) fylfot: from anomalous bauble to pivotal artifact. Maryland Archeology 49(1): 23–28.Google Scholar
  18. Schiffer, M. B. (1987). Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
  19. Stoler, A. L. (2013). Introduction. In Stoler, A. L. (ed.), Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Woodstock Letters. (1932). Letter 61, p. 16. Woodstock College, Woodstock, MD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Francis Xavier Chapel Archaeological Project, Gibb Archaeological ConsultingAnnapolisUSA
  2. 2.Grave ConcernsPark HallUSA

Personalised recommendations